Transactions Use Tax & Citizens Oversight Committee
Transcript
| Start Over Again Notice is hereby given that a special meeting of the Transaction and Use Tax Citizens Oversight Committee is | 00:02:27 | |
| hereby called to be held on Wednesday, December 11th, 2024 at 5:00. | 00:02:35 | |
| In the Fort Wayne city. | 00:02:43 | |
| Hall Chamber located at 250 N Ventura Rd. Fort Wayne, California. | 00:02:46 | |
| Set a special meeting shall be for the purpose of conducting business in accordance with the attached agenda. | 00:02:54 | |
| So I'll call her to order. | 00:02:59 | |
| Roll call, roll call. OK, I'll be handling roll call today. | 00:03:03 | |
| Member Diaz. Member Villanueva. | 00:03:09 | |
| Member Villanueva's app sync right? | 00:03:14 | |
| She may come later. Remember Victoria here. Vice Chair Williams here, Chair Scrivener here. Thank you. | 00:03:16 | |
| OK, Apparently there's no public comment unless an event thing been submitted to anybody. That OK? No public comment. OK, consent | 00:03:28 | |
| calendar. | 00:03:33 | |
| All matters listed in the Consent Calendar are to be considered routine. | 00:03:38 | |
| By government body and will be enacted in one motion. | 00:03:43 | |
| In the form listed, there are no discussions of these items before governing body votes on a motion to adopt. | 00:03:47 | |
| Specific items are removed from the consent calendar on separate motions. | 00:03:55 | |
| So we basically have the minutes. | 00:04:00 | |
| Just the minutes. | 00:04:04 | |
| And I'll note, I'll note for the record, board member Villanueva is present. So all five members are present. | 00:04:08 | |
| OK, so do we need to take a vote on this? | 00:04:15 | |
| Yeah, just. | 00:04:19 | |
| Yeah, just yes, a motion and a vote please. I do have a motion to. | 00:04:22 | |
| Accept. | 00:04:28 | |
| I make a motion to accept the minutes. | 00:04:29 | |
| Thank you all. All opposed. | 00:04:33 | |
| All in favor. Thank you. | 00:04:37 | |
| OK. Business items, initial measure you committee review and I just wanted to let you know that we have a special visitor here | 00:04:42 | |
| today. | 00:04:46 | |
| Congratulations. | 00:04:58 | |
| So the record will reflect 1/6 board. | 00:04:59 | |
| You only get one vote though. | 00:05:03 | |
| OK. So we have our chart up in front of us here. The measure you actual expense in a fiscal year 223 and 24, Yes, and I'll give a | 00:05:10 | |
| brief report. We have two items on the agenda today and both are are we'll try to keep them simple brief. | 00:05:20 | |
| But obviously we'll answer any questions. | 00:05:32 | |
| Really the. | 00:05:36 | |
| Today is kind of the meeting to set the stage for the next year. I think we've talked a lot over the last 18 months about the goal | 00:05:38 | |
| of we've all had of Measure U committee being ahead of the game and not, not, not simply. | 00:05:46 | |
| Approving past information, but actually being proactive and being able to to preview the information and provide guidance as part | 00:05:56 | |
| of that process. And so today's agenda is actually with that intent. | 00:06:03 | |
| We're looking forward to next year. The first item is kind of getting general big picture guidance from the. | 00:06:10 | |
| Committee, as we start our budget process, you know we talked about you know December's kind of the the calm before the storm and | 00:06:20 | |
| then we really start usually we start right about now with really starting to put the budget together and starting to get an | 00:06:26 | |
| initial draft of the budget and so. | 00:06:32 | |
| We talked about, well, should we like you know. | 00:06:40 | |
| Come to the committee in March and come with a proposed budget or for the first time this year, we said let's actually come to the | 00:06:44 | |
| committee now and say as we're starting to put the budget together, you know, we want to make sure we're kind. We're going in the | 00:06:50 | |
| direction that the committee wants to go in. And so, you know, rather than bring a document and have to work backwards, let's | 00:06:56 | |
| actually get some like guidance moving forward. | 00:07:02 | |
| So the point of this business item? | 00:07:10 | |
| Initial measure you committee review and feedback on priority categories is very high level. It's essentially what we did was we | 00:07:15 | |
| looked back at the last two years and this chart shows the last two years and we looked at OK, where have we? | 00:07:21 | |
| Prioritized, what areas have we prioritized with measure you funding and in what amounts? And then looking at the next year and | 00:07:30 | |
| what we're expecting with next year, what kind of revenues we're expecting to get it, you know, are these the same areas we want | 00:07:35 | |
| to prioritize? | 00:07:40 | |
| Next year or do we want to, you know, just kind of at a high level, do we want to make any changes or are we comfortable with the | 00:07:46 | |
| same approach? And so this chart off the top shows. | 00:07:53 | |
| You know the four priority areas of Measure you funding and over the last couple of years. | 00:08:00 | |
| We have per this chart prioritized the, I would say the public safety has been the highest level priority. You can see for the | 00:08:07 | |
| chart that in 2023 that was about $1.6 million of, you know, generally you know, 3 to $3.5 million total. So that's about 1.6 | 00:08:15 | |
| million or about half of the funding goes to public safety. | 00:08:24 | |
| And then you can see streets and maintenance gets about maybe 1/4. | 00:08:33 | |
| Maybe a little less than a quarter $700,000 CIP has has gotten got about 700,000 two years ago, but. | 00:08:38 | |
| It's a little complicated. I try to, we try to really like keep these like simple, but inevitably some things get complicated | 00:08:51 | |
| because capital improvement projects include projects that also are in these other categories. So it's kind of like double | 00:08:56 | |
| counting, you know, our. | 00:09:02 | |
| Maybe double counting or the opposite, but but a CIP, the reason why the CIP increased so much where you can see from the first | 00:09:10 | |
| year to the second year that had the biggest increase was because of the Bubbling Springs Park project. So if you recall last year | 00:09:16 | |
| we came to the committee and we said, you know, the Bubbling Springs Park project is over budget and you know, if if it we had a | 00:09:22 | |
| long conversation about it. Does this fit the, you know, the. | 00:09:28 | |
| Is this a priority? Is this something that the measure you funds that you would support using measure you funds for? And so the | 00:09:36 | |
| good news with that is we're on pace to finish the project in March ish. But everything we've actually kept everything on pace. We | 00:09:43 | |
| are on schedule as of right this minute, even though just a little off off the point, but the that park is right next to that | 00:09:49 | |
| Creek and every time we dig. | 00:09:56 | |
| It's. | 00:10:04 | |
| It's, you know, we hold our breaths because you don't know what when you're going to dig in the Creek starts bubbling up or | 00:10:06 | |
| anything like that. But we've been able to keep it on pace. But so that's due to be done in March. So that this chart shows that | 00:10:11 | |
| that had a spike, but I think that was a one year situation because of bubbling springs and we would anticipate that that would | 00:10:17 | |
| start to drop again this year and that we would be sort of deprioritized again. | 00:10:23 | |
| Yes. | 00:10:30 | |
| So as I recall. | 00:10:33 | |
| When we did an audit and found out where all the money had gone, you know, over the past several years, we didn't have any access | 00:10:36 | |
| to, we had, we had about $1.7 million leftover and it seemed like a worthy choice to put that towards the capital improvements in | 00:10:43 | |
| the parks, which I think we're all pretty happy with. And I don't anticipate to spending, you know, 15 more $1,000,000 on any | 00:10:49 | |
| parks anytime soon, not anytime soon. | 00:10:56 | |
| 2040 is not down and whatever, but yeah. | 00:11:03 | |
| So let me say, I think that's a one time spike. Yeah. And I wanted to ask where are we with on budget with the park? It seems like | 00:11:07 | |
| anytime we do construction, it always runs over. So we're on budget with what we. | 00:11:13 | |
| You know, if you remember that conversation was us coming back and saying we need to be realistic about the budget. | 00:11:21 | |
| I think the initial budget estimate was $9 million and we were, you know. | 00:11:27 | |
| We had the conversation, then we called all the contractors in and. | 00:11:32 | |
| Just my conversation with them is if you put an estimate together for $9 million five years ago, it's not $9 million anymore. And | 00:11:36 | |
| so we came back and we revised our estimates. | 00:11:41 | |
| And we came back at 15,000,000 and right now we're right on 15,000,000. So the positive is I think instead of waiting to be kind | 00:11:47 | |
| of, you know, to get reality thrown at us, we actually proactively, you know, came back and said we need to be realistic with this | 00:11:54 | |
| budget. So, so we're right on pace with that. We're on pace with the schedule, we're on pace with the budget. So it's actually | 00:12:02 | |
| working, sticking within that. And then if anybody saw last week's council meeting, the Little League was here. | 00:12:09 | |
| We're finalizing all the agreements for them to actually be able to start playing again as soon as it opens. So I think we're kind | 00:12:17 | |
| of on schedule with where we need to be with that. So that was a one year spike. It won't be that way. Well, we don't anticipate | 00:12:23 | |
| and we don't actually propose continuing at that level. And one of the next slides will show that number coming back down from 1.7 | 00:12:29 | |
| back to about the the original number. | 00:12:36 | |
| I think it's the next slide after this. | 00:12:43 | |
| That one, yeah. So this is as of right this minute based on the projects that we had proposed to the council like for our capital | 00:12:46 | |
| improvement project plan, these are the projects scheduled for next year and then these are the ones whether the project scheduled | 00:12:55 | |
| that would use measure you funding and so the number drops back to 836,000 so. | 00:13:04 | |
| The the CIP, which became the second largest chunk of funding for Measure U. It would go back down, which. | 00:13:13 | |
| Which we would anticipate then would allow for some of the other areas to be funded. But the, So the list of projects for 26 I'll | 00:13:22 | |
| just explain briefly the $194,000 every year for five years we had a parking lot budget to where we divided out all the parking | 00:13:29 | |
| lots we had with the idea of having all the parking lots maintained and repaved. And so next year would be some of the beach | 00:13:36 | |
| parking lots, the library, which. | 00:13:44 | |
| We had started to complete this year but when they closed we put it on hold till till their constructions done so that would be | 00:13:51 | |
| next year. And then some parks parking lots like the Bubbling Springs Park parking lot for example. | 00:13:57 | |
| So that would be 194,000 of that 830,000. | 00:14:04 | |
| Pedestrian lighting at Bulker Park, $50,000. | 00:14:08 | |
| The Lifeguard building roof repairs at Wyoming Beach, $35,000. | 00:14:13 | |
| Miranda park building engineering and remodel $45,000 that one I just have to be clear with everybody though, this is that | 00:14:21 | |
| building in Miranda park that I. | 00:14:26 | |
| Really we, we, the goal will be to bring that back and find some use for it. But the $45,000 is what we estimate just to do the | 00:14:32 | |
| engineering and so the the project itself. | 00:14:39 | |
| Like the next year would be the development of the plans, but the project itself wouldn't be completed next year. It's gonna be | 00:14:47 | |
| significant. The 45,000 is just the paperwork, basically. Yeah. And then the designs and figuring coming up with our designs and | 00:14:52 | |
| what we wanna do with it. | 00:14:57 | |
| So, so it's a good start, but I know that one, a lot of people have ideas. We've been approached by a lot of people who go like, | 00:15:03 | |
| hey, let us operate that building and let us do something with it. And it's like it, it needs, it needs significant repairs before | 00:15:08 | |
| we're able to do that. So. | 00:15:14 | |
| So, and then a Pearson Rd. storm drain and storm drains are one of those things that aren't glamorous. So a lot of times cities | 00:15:20 | |
| cut those and, but I try to remind everybody like that's the kind of stuff that then you, when you need them, you regret cutting | 00:15:27 | |
| it and you don't want to get into that situation. So you can see that's a big chunk of the funding, $337,000, but they're | 00:15:33 | |
| important. They're not glamorous, but they're important. | 00:15:40 | |
| And then we have $25,000 identified for electric vehicle charging stations at the beach and then $150,000 for it's actually | 00:15:47 | |
| emergency vehicle preemption traffic signals and that's. | 00:15:55 | |
| The system where the emergency vehicles can actually change the traffic signals when needed so. | 00:16:04 | |
| So that's right now what's scheduled. And so if we went back to that chart, for example, I. | 00:16:10 | |
| Back one more slide. So for CIP, again that spike, it would drop back down like what we're expecting for 2025 is that that | 00:16:18 | |
| category is going to drop back down to that 2023 level and that was just a one year increase because of the Bubbling Springs Park | 00:16:24 | |
| project. | 00:16:29 | |
| And so. | 00:16:36 | |
| Most of the other categories are pretty consistent, like streets and maintenance didn't very much. Parks and Rec varied a little | 00:16:37 | |
| bit. I would say both dropped a little bit, mostly because we allocated that funding to the Bubbling Springs Park project. So that | 00:16:44 | |
| impacted some of the other areas, but you know, they've been pretty consistent and so. | 00:16:51 | |
| We. | 00:17:02 | |
| Oh, and then the next slide, please. | 00:17:04 | |
| And so we looked at next year's. | 00:17:06 | |
| Estimate. | 00:17:10 | |
| And let me give you a little bit of information on that is what we base, where we, how we come up with this number that we | 00:17:12 | |
| estimate that Measure U revenues will be $3.1 million next year is the city actually has a contract with a company called HDL and | 00:17:20 | |
| HD LS. They're the kind of the standard most of these contract with HDL and their expertise is sales tax analysis and property tax | 00:17:27 | |
| analysis and because they contract with everyone. | 00:17:34 | |
| They see they are pretty good usually at anticipating what's gonna happen with sales tax and property tax. And so for us next | 00:17:42 | |
| year, they anticipate our sales tax is gonna be pretty flat. | 00:17:49 | |
| We aren't gonna, we don't expect growth, a lot of growth next year in sales tax and really mostly that can be attributed to the | 00:17:57 | |
| cannabis tax. | 00:18:02 | |
| We don't officially have a cannabis tax, but the cannabis revenues that we receive. And so if the cannabis revenues drop, then our | 00:18:07 | |
| sales tax drops. And just with the neighboring cities continuing to open more and more cannabis dispensaries, we think that is | 00:18:14 | |
| just going to keep being a pressure on us. So, so the revenues for next year are pretty flat. We've been at about $3.1 million | 00:18:22 | |
| last year and about $3.1 million this year and we expect to be at about 3 point. | 00:18:29 | |
| Million next year. | 00:18:37 | |
| And so that's where we start on this chart is, you know assuming that we have that we expect a $3.1 million revenue next year, | 00:18:39 | |
| then we basically took the averages from those prior charts and we said if it's $3.1 million that would be this many dollars in | 00:18:46 | |
| each of these categories based on the averages. So $1.4 million for public safety, $488,000 for streets and maintenance, $343,000 | 00:18:54 | |
| for parks and rec. | 00:19:01 | |
| $136,000 for CIP. | 00:19:09 | |
| And so that's essentially when we start with the budget and we have to make assumptions about, you know, what areas we need to | 00:19:12 | |
| fund, at what levels. This is what we would start with based on kind of the history of the measure, Measure U committee and what's | 00:19:20 | |
| been approved. And so the point of the item is to basically lay that out and then ask for feedback of is that a good starting | 00:19:27 | |
| point or you know, is it, is there an area that the committee would want us would want to focus? | 00:19:35 | |
| More so than others. | 00:19:42 | |
| So if you can go back one more time. | 00:19:45 | |
| It's it ends up the the final numbers end up. | 00:19:49 | |
| Pretty comparable to that 2023 actual, but the big biggest change from 2024 is the CIP. | 00:19:53 | |
| Dollars go down because of Boeing Springs, but also the public safety dollars would be actually a pretty significant drop from | 00:20:02 | |
| $2.2 million of Measure U to I think it was one about $1.43 million is is being suggested. So that's probably the if, if I had to | 00:20:08 | |
| anticipate what the biggest. | 00:20:15 | |
| Question would be it would probably be are the maybe the biggest discussion point would be. | 00:20:23 | |
| I think the other categories are like fairly stable or there's a good reason why it's not with the CIP category, but I think it's | 00:20:29 | |
| that public safety category. Is that the level of funding that the measure you committee would want to allocate or you know this | 00:20:38 | |
| year it was significantly higher, 2.2 million I think it was. So you know, is that an area that the committee would want to? | 00:20:46 | |
| Look at prioritizing more than. | 00:20:55 | |
| Just based on the average in the past. So, so that's again, it's high level. It's sort of, you know, kind of tell us if we're | 00:20:58 | |
| going in the right direction because now we're going to kind of get into the nitty gritty and actually go through line items and | 00:21:04 | |
| try to, you know, kind of. | 00:21:09 | |
| Allocate these dollars into the budget. And so we're just looking for that general feedback. | 00:21:17 | |
| So did the federal grant that we got for the project, did we meet the deadline? So we got all the funding from them. So Angela | 00:21:23 | |
| gets to brag that she opened a, what is it, a $6 million check this week, A lovely $6 million. | 00:21:32 | |
| And so that one I, I want to give credit because. | 00:21:41 | |
| I'm not. | 00:21:49 | |
| Confident right now that with everything going on at the state and federal level that we, that we, we may, there may be grant | 00:21:51 | |
| impacts, you know, some of the grants that have been issued in the past could be pulled, you know, could be cancelled or even | 00:21:58 | |
| dollars that have been promised could be pulled back. So we made sure that we build everything as soon as we as soon as we did it | 00:22:05 | |
| on the project, we build it and we got the, the biggest chunk of the money in so. | 00:22:12 | |
| So that was good proactive work by our finance department. And so for us, we at this point, I think we've got almost every dollar | 00:22:20 | |
| from the federal grant, right. | 00:22:26 | |
| I think there was like maybe like less than $1,000,000 left or something like that. So, so we've we've been able to get that done | 00:22:33 | |
| before there's any talk of polling grants back or anything like that. | 00:22:39 | |
| Great, I had heard some cheering over this way. I wondered what it was. | 00:22:45 | |
| It is. It's just me. Yeah. We don't, we don't get the, you know, you get used to seeing bigger numbers, but we don't see $6 | 00:22:53 | |
| million checks very often, so. | 00:22:58 | |
| I noticed that we're. | 00:23:06 | |
| Putting electric vehicle charging station and. | 00:23:09 | |
| I want to understand the strategy there. I I don't, I don't pay any money for a gas station. Why are we? | 00:23:17 | |
| Holding those folks out, I have an electric vehicle, but I, I don't, I'm not, I don't need an electric vehicle station around | 00:23:26 | |
| here. So what's that about? What's the strategy? Is it a money maker? No, it's not a money maker. And that's a that's a big | 00:23:33 | |
| question that you could get different answers from different people on, but I'll tell you the I'll tell you the best answers that | 00:23:39 | |
| I've heard is. | 00:23:45 | |
| And. | 00:23:53 | |
| When electric vehicle chargers were first becoming, our electric vehicles were first kind of becoming, you know, more popular a | 00:23:57 | |
| lot of cities. | 00:24:02 | |
| Adopted like policies or statements that because of the environmental impact, positive environmental impact of driving a zero or | 00:24:09 | |
| low emission vehicle, that cities were going to be supportive of electric vehicle infrastructure and install electric vehicle | 00:24:17 | |
| infrastructure. | 00:24:24 | |
| A lot of cities, most cities, I would say from about 2015 to 2020, a lot of cities that installed them actually installed it with | 00:24:33 | |
| free electricity, which was something that was was not sustainable. And I was working in a city that had installed free chargers | 00:24:40 | |
| and had to be the person to break the news that you can't afford to keep paying for people's electricity. And so, so most cities | 00:24:48 | |
| at this point have now started to charge. | 00:24:55 | |
| The cost of the electricity and so, but it's not a money maker. I'm not really aware of any city that actually like charges enough | 00:25:03 | |
| to make any profit off of it. But I think that the general, you know, there's, there's a lot to it, but I think the general | 00:25:10 | |
| response from cities would be, well, you know, we adopted as a policy a statement that we wanted to support electric vehicles to | 00:25:17 | |
| reduce the greenhouse gases in our community or, you know, something along those lines. | 00:25:24 | |
| So. | 00:25:32 | |
| So that's the thought. And so we as a city have. | 00:25:33 | |
| Plans that call for installation of chargers at certain locations. Interesting. Like interestingly enough, when you mention it, | 00:25:38 | |
| because that is probably the one project on this list that I did a little bit of a double take at is that now home charging is | 00:25:45 | |
| becoming so prevalent that it's like you start to think, well, maybe maybe those plans that we had initially are kind of outdated | 00:25:51 | |
| now, you know? | 00:25:57 | |
| But, and so it's something. | 00:26:05 | |
| Something we've talked about internally and it's like, well, how many vehicles, chargers do we need? And I don't think we need as | 00:26:07 | |
| many as we thought we needed. | 00:26:11 | |
| Because if you remember when electric vehicles first came out, it was like cities were trying to jam in chargers as much as | 00:26:15 | |
| possible. But a lot of people just charge at home now. | 00:26:18 | |
| So I think for us, we still have a couple in key locations. We have plans to put a couple at Bubbling Springs Park eventually. | 00:26:23 | |
| That was actually part of the grant. And so it's actually a grant requirement now that we had proposed it back in 2017 or whenever | 00:26:30 | |
| that grant application went in. And then we had planned to put a couple at the beach. And so we don't actually have a whole lot | 00:26:37 | |
| planned, but those ones are part of the plan. So we have them in our capital improvement project plan, so. | 00:26:44 | |
| I wonder why they can't be profitable because if you have an EV and you get some location you realize you don't have enough fuel, | 00:26:51 | |
| you'd be thrilled to pay anything. | 00:26:57 | |
| To charge them so I, I don't know if the consumer would be hurt when they were told your choices pay this amount or go home and | 00:27:02 | |
| push the car home and so they would pay I think they could be profitable if you can change the meters. One of the challenges for | 00:27:10 | |
| cities to to bear in mind and you know, it's funny because I think you've identified like a, like a, what's it called a gap in the | 00:27:17 | |
| market. Somebody out there can. | 00:27:25 | |
| You know, and I keep saying this, I keep waiting for a gas station to convert a couple of spaces to electric and, you know, and | 00:27:32 | |
| actually make some money off of it. But for cities, as a general rule, we are not able to charge for service. We provide more than | 00:27:39 | |
| the cost of the service itself. And so cities, we really can't make profits. It's almost it's, you know, we're, we're a public | 00:27:46 | |
| service, so. | 00:27:53 | |
| Can you charge for the cost of installing? | 00:28:01 | |
| I mean, if you cost $10,000 to install one of these things, can you put that you could build that into the cost. So since we can | 00:28:04 | |
| recover the cost of service, we could say we're gonna charge for electricity, we're gonna, every person who charges is gonna pay, | 00:28:10 | |
| you know, .0001% of the installation cost as well. And you can recover the cost back. So, so that that is possible over what time | 00:28:16 | |
| period? | 00:28:23 | |
| 5-10 years, what is it? | 00:28:29 | |
| Normally when we do rate studies, we do, we do most of them on like kind of a five year cycle. So probably that it's technical and | 00:28:33 | |
| there might be some ability to adjust that. But normally we do things over A5 year periods. And as an example, we went to council | 00:28:40 | |
| last week to talk about our utility rates and we're in the council approved that we're going to do a five year study for our | 00:28:47 | |
| utility rates. So we we tend to do 5 year cycles. Very good. Thank you. | 00:28:54 | |
| I one more comment. | 00:29:02 | |
| With all the new building going in, there's not enough parking to start with. People don't have a garage to park in and charge in. | 00:29:05 | |
| So it really occurred to me I've been thinking about this lately. What happens to people who live in apartments? Who. | 00:29:12 | |
| Don't can't just plug into their home thing. | 00:29:20 | |
| So they got to go find some place to charge up and. | 00:29:23 | |
| That's why we talked about this internally and we were talking about, you know what, we might not need hundreds of charging | 00:29:27 | |
| stations, but on the flip side, you know, some people's opinion at the we've heard some feedback where people go, hey, you know, | 00:29:33 | |
| it seems like people have enough charges right now. But the reality is our our kind of opinion was looking at our community and | 00:29:39 | |
| the fact that we have a lot of. | 00:29:46 | |
| Like condo complexes? Townhome complexes with homeowners associations. | 00:29:53 | |
| To the public, but ensuring we have enough that the people who need them have access to them. | 00:30:27 | |
| So Surfside One condominiums, they have them now and they're profitable on those. | 00:30:32 | |
| And so it serves their little community there. But also if you just charge off a of 110 volts in your garage overnight, you'll get | 00:30:39 | |
| enough charge to take you a number of miles. I mean, we're talking about under pain on the car, but I think you could get. | 00:30:49 | |
| 1/2 charge, that would be about 150 miles. So unless you're commuting a long distance, that sort of maintains it for you just with | 00:31:05 | |
| 110 Volt power. | 00:31:11 | |
| So. | 00:31:21 | |
| These. | 00:31:24 | |
| The charging stations you're talking about at the beach, would they be, they'd be inside the lot. And so would people also have to | 00:31:25 | |
| get a parking permit as well, right? Yes. Is that what you're talking about? Yes and so. | 00:31:32 | |
| It can be set up a couple ways and I don't remember off the top with the plan. I think that the way it works typically is they | 00:31:40 | |
| can, when they park at the charging station, they pay to park at the charging station, but they can only stay in that spot while | 00:31:46 | |
| they're charging and then they need to move. And then they would have to buy a parking permit. And so the cost of the permit would | 00:31:53 | |
| be built into the cost of the charging. | 00:31:59 | |
| So. | 00:32:07 | |
| And then is there an indicator so when, when the parking lady goes by, she can see that it's fully charged or something? I don't | 00:32:08 | |
| know how those work. Yeah, yeah, potentially they do. I mean, you go to the beach and you could forget, you know, just like you | 00:32:15 | |
| forget you only have a 2 hour, you know, permit or yeah, they're, they're pretty fancy. Now there's things they have some of them | 00:32:23 | |
| will have lights saying that they're fully charged. You know, they all have. | 00:32:30 | |
| Screens that will say whether they're charging or fully charged, and then a lot of them too now. | 00:32:38 | |
| I think the ones we have at City Hall do this. If, if you're fully charged, it'll actually e-mail you and tell you or send you a | 00:32:45 | |
| notification on your phone. You know your car is ready, please move it, that kind of a thing. So I know Tesla has a simple system. | 00:32:53 | |
| That when you are full. | 00:33:01 | |
| They start charging you idle fees. That's probably something at a dollar a minute. | 00:33:05 | |
| To encourage you to move your vehicle and so you get it out of there, you pay attention to it, it's on your shoulders to time it. | 00:33:11 | |
| So I, I would like that for us, if it's idle, charge them. That's probably how we address that. You know, the concern, if the | 00:33:17 | |
| concern is that, you know, people will figure out, well, if I park there and I put the plug in, then I don't have to pay for | 00:33:24 | |
| parking. You're probably going to end up paying more if you do that. | 00:33:30 | |
| So as far as this project is concerned. | 00:33:39 | |
| Say five years down the road, are they still going to be using these chargers? This thing is going to evolve into something else | 00:33:43 | |
| that they're going to have to pull these out and put a newer one. Yeah, that's always the concern with these. And there are like | 00:33:49 | |
| the two standards right now and, and the ones we have are the there's the Tesla standard that is for Tesla's and then there's the | 00:33:56 | |
| one that's for everybody else. The ones we install are the ones for everybody else. | 00:34:02 | |
| And both cars. | 00:34:09 | |
| Both ways you can get at the adapter, so you could use the other one, but typically cities typically don't install the Tesla ones | 00:34:12 | |
| because they're seen as just being exclusive and only beneficial to Tesla drivers. You know, I'm just thinking, you know, we're | 00:34:17 | |
| spending money on these and in five years we're going to have to put in something else because I think it's going to evolve that | 00:34:23 | |
| quick that we don't want to do. | 00:34:29 | |
| Because we have to swap the units, it'll be a few $1000, but it should be minor. So we have all our master plan documents and some | 00:35:05 | |
| of them include sort of the plan to get the infrastructure out there. | 00:35:12 | |
| So I don't know if there's a consensus, but. | 00:35:20 | |
| You can talk about this. It seems like if we can build the cost of paying for this into the user fee, that way we're not | 00:35:23 | |
| subsidizing anybody and the money is there to swap it out the next time around. | 00:35:29 | |
| I think I'm hearing that, yeah. And I think that's that's in line with, no, I agree. Yeah, Yeah, I'll sit there. Yeah, exactly. I | 00:35:38 | |
| have another thing that I'd like to discuss here for a second on the capital improvement. | 00:35:45 | |
| We need a traffic light at Lido and Channel Islands Blvd. | 00:35:54 | |
| I have a. | 00:35:58 | |
| Rental house over on Bulker and I've had a lot of experience here. It's next impossible to get out many times on Channel Islands | 00:36:00 | |
| Blvd. and there's a series of wrecks there that happen all the time. I think the people coming out of. | 00:36:06 | |
| Wanami Bay or also kind of in a situation. So what's happening is I've lived here a long time with Channel Islands Blvd. Used to | 00:36:14 | |
| be you could play hockey out there and now it's just it's a constant. We've got the traffic speeds down, but. | 00:36:22 | |
| Housing developments going in, this whole thing at the harbor, there's going to be lots more traffic going there and that's a | 00:36:31 | |
| that's a particularly dangerous area. For one point, there was like a week or a record to a week over there. I'm looking at what | 00:36:37 | |
| insurance company should pay for a light there because it would save them some money. It was pretty bad. I haven't been over there | 00:36:43 | |
| much recently, but I'd like to throw that out as maybe. | 00:36:50 | |
| A potential capital improvement. I don't know what other people think. | 00:36:57 | |
| Yeah, and we. | 00:37:02 | |
| There was actually when I first arrived, I think we had three accidents in two weeks there. And, and for me it was, it was | 00:37:04 | |
| surprising because. | 00:37:08 | |
| A lot of people know I lived here for 10 years and then became city manager somewhere else. And so then I moved there and then I | 00:37:14 | |
| came back. I came back to work here and now I need to figure out how to move back here and so but. | 00:37:20 | |
| So I had lived here and I never thought of that area is particularly dangerous. It wasn't. And I came back and we had three | 00:37:27 | |
| accidents in two weeks. So, so we did, we went out, we restriped, we added the keep clear area and we, we lowered the speed limit. | 00:37:33 | |
| So we did a few things in it and it's definitely. | 00:37:39 | |
| We aren't getting 3 accidents in two weeks anymore, but it's an area we get a lot of questions about and we hear about so. So has | 00:37:45 | |
| there been a? | 00:37:49 | |
| Has there been a study, have you seen the difference with lowering the speed limit? Yeah, we've definitely seen an improvement | 00:37:55 | |
| since then. And. | 00:37:59 | |
| The we've seen an improvement, I think to member Scrivener's point is 11 little like fact to keep in mind that that I I think we | 00:38:05 | |
| almost like all like naturally know, but we never talk about is that that intersection of Channel Islands and Ventura is actually | 00:38:13 | |
| one of the busiest intersections in the county. I think it's the number 2 busiest intersection in the county. | 00:38:21 | |
| The intersection of Channel Islands and Ventura is is what second busiest intersection in the county? Yeah. | 00:38:31 | |
| And so, so we, we, we did those things. It's definitely made a difference. Like we haven't had the accidents at nearly the same | 00:38:37 | |
| rate we were having before. But it is a kind of a area for us that we're, we're continuing to watch it. And like, we know we might | 00:38:45 | |
| need to keep adjusting if it just keeps getting more and more busy, you know? And so there's a couple things like Mr. Scrivener | 00:38:52 | |
| mentioned, the there are plans to do something big at the harbor. And if that happens, that could bring more traffic. I'm not. | 00:39:00 | |
| My breath on that one because I think there's been plans to do something big at the harbor for 20 years now, but it doesn't look | 00:39:07 | |
| like a good idea. The idea that they picked is surprised me. So I guess we'll see if it goes anywhere. But so that's an area, I | 00:39:15 | |
| think that's an area that we will continue to watch and keep an eye on and. | 00:39:22 | |
| I think at this point with this being like the high level discussion, it's like I think it's appropriate if you want to give some | 00:39:31 | |
| general. | 00:39:34 | |
| Areas to focus on like that, then we can kind of take it back and try to figure out how we can build things in and and all and you | 00:39:40 | |
| know, kind of start planning for so. | 00:39:45 | |
| So can I ask, how do people feel about the balance of? | 00:39:50 | |
| Projected income for different category to go back to us. | 00:39:54 | |
| So with. | 00:40:01 | |
| What did you call it? A. | 00:40:05 | |
| Flat revenue projection for this year and looking at the. | 00:40:07 | |
| The lower proportions, how is that going to because for me public safety is is the biggest priority and I think we've done a good | 00:40:17 | |
| job for them so far. How is that projection, whatever that amount is you've projected for this? Yeah, coming here for the fourteen | 00:40:26 | |
| 1,000,431, how is that going to affect their overall budget is that. | 00:40:34 | |
| Yeah. And you know, one thing I didn't say and I think it's essentially where you're going is. | 00:40:44 | |
| You know. | 00:40:50 | |
| Our sales tax revenue is flat. It's going to be tight this year for us as a city. | 00:40:51 | |
| Our our budget was very tight last year. We were essentially. | 00:40:59 | |
| We we cut $3,000,000 out of the budget to stay balanced last year. | 00:41:08 | |
| And looking ahead? | 00:41:14 | |
| If you're looking ahead and you're expecting your biggest revenue sales tax to stay flat, but we all know costs are going up right | 00:41:17 | |
| now and inflation and everything, we expect costs to go up, let's let's say conservatively 5% while you're starting with the 5% | 00:41:23 | |
| deficit. So, so we do expect the budget to be very tight. | 00:41:30 | |
| And so I think maybe to maybe the best answer to I think the where you're going with that is that if. | 00:41:38 | |
| Public safety is the priority for Measure U. That would be like, that would be like a perfect example of the feedback to us | 00:41:48 | |
| because then we can make sure when we're doing the budget that we make that the priority for Measure U. | 00:41:53 | |
| And so although. | 00:42:00 | |
| It's hard to get into the the weeds with that right now because you only have a chunk of the budget in front of you, not the whole | 00:42:04 | |
| thing. I think it's going to be very tight and I think that that would be whatever maybe a good way to approach it is whatever is | 00:42:10 | |
| the priority measure, you identifies that and then we'll make sure it's the priority. I think that's kind of the high level | 00:42:15 | |
| guidance at this point, so. | 00:42:20 | |
| Priorities. | 00:42:27 | |
| What do you think? | 00:42:28 | |
| I think we've seen that this looks sort of like a standard other than this one change we had in CIP that. | 00:42:32 | |
| But we knew that was coming. | 00:42:38 | |
| So that looks like a good. | 00:42:41 | |
| Distribution between the four different. | 00:42:42 | |
| I also agree. I believe it's. | 00:42:54 | |
| It I agree with public safety being the top priority. | 00:42:59 | |
| Yeah, the way they're prioritized right there, you can see that that. | 00:43:05 | |
| The road we should be going. | 00:43:09 | |
| I feel like since you've come on board and the new chief has come on board, we've had kind of some remarkable changes in the whole | 00:43:14 | |
| public safety thing, which I'm very grateful for. | 00:43:19 | |
| I think everybody I've talked to is pretty happy with and if we're not safe, nothing else, nothing else matters. And I don't want | 00:43:27 | |
| to get overly paranoid and get, you know, an armed police force with, with tanks and some of the people now, but that's not the | 00:43:33 | |
| direction we're headed in. So, so basically tank would be more than 1.4 million. | 00:43:40 | |
| I think the public safety is in real public safety, not stuff that's thrown in, it's puffed, which we hear all the time, but I | 00:43:51 | |
| think from what I can see, the chiefs. | 00:43:56 | |
| Decisions have been right on and so I think my personal opinion is that's the first priority and everything else falls beyond | 00:44:02 | |
| after that. | 00:44:07 | |
| So I think. | 00:44:13 | |
| I think the sense I get. | 00:44:15 | |
| And I guess I'll ask you guys to tell me if I'm just wrong is as we start to develop the budget that. | 00:44:18 | |
| Keeping public safety is the priority. We have sort of a draft what we expect budget to look like, but if we get down the road and | 00:44:27 | |
| we realize that. | 00:44:31 | |
| You know, public safety is being shorted compared to the year before then we I think we have the support to make sure that it's | 00:44:36 | |
| the priority and that we're able to to pay for what we need for public safety. And so if that that increases a little bit and we | 00:44:41 | |
| take everything else down a little bit at that time if that's what's needed, it sounds like the committee supports that, but we'll | 00:44:47 | |
| try to start with this and see where that gets us and then. | 00:44:53 | |
| I think with the process, we're planning to come back, but the next item we'll get to a minute is sets the meeting calendar. But | 00:44:59 | |
| we'd be coming back in March with, with the, with the, you know, the detail to it. And we'd come back and we can say if we were | 00:45:05 | |
| able to make everything work at these levels or if we needed to adjust public safety up and everything else down a little bit. | 00:45:12 | |
| OK, great. OK with everybody. Yes. | 00:45:19 | |
| In public safety was that? | 00:45:23 | |
| Donut ******** ******** nation of the Kirby Was that in those funds? Is that oh the traffic don't the traffic donut pilot project? | 00:45:27 | |
| That wasn't this fund actually that we were able to do that with, it would have been our streets and maintenance and then we | 00:45:42 | |
| actually have applied for a grant for to hopefully cover the cost of that and maybe. | 00:45:49 | |
| If we decided to try a second location, we've had some requests from some neighborhoods for a second location of of that. So, so | 00:45:56 | |
| that shouldn't come out of the public safety funding. So well, that's been highly successful. Everyone's noticed it's changed that | 00:46:05 | |
| a lot. And also places like right in front of the Surfside Seafood, I noticed they have moved over there. | 00:46:13 | |
| And so some curbing there would be a similar type of stuff and it's low, I think it's low maintenance. | 00:46:22 | |
| Yeah. We, what we came up with was pretty low cost, pretty low maintenance. We wanted to test it, but we figured. | 00:46:29 | |
| That would be wonderful. And it appears that the fire department's happy with that type of curbing. It doesn't slow them down and. | 00:47:08 | |
| It's also it can be camouflaged because especially like in front of Surfside Seafood, it can be put between the parking spots so | 00:47:17 | |
| that still people can come and go. No one's going to run over that little curb. If they do, it doesn't hurt their car, but it | 00:47:24 | |
| still keeps the. | 00:47:31 | |
| I don't know, crazy teenagers out of there. So the only thing is if we could employ that type of curbing other places so that we | 00:47:38 | |
| get out of the race car syndrome. | 00:47:45 | |
| Down. | 00:47:52 | |
| Ventura Rd. | 00:47:54 | |
| I've heard complaints from the Navy base, the people that live over there, it's just horrible for them. Ventura Roads a challenge. | 00:47:56 | |
| We I. | 00:48:02 | |
| We brought back motorcycle enforcement and hopefully you've seen them. I've seen them because I drive Ventura Rd. every day, but | 00:48:08 | |
| they are out there every day. And in fact today we had our employee appreciation event and when I came out they had just pulled | 00:48:14 | |
| somebody over and were. | 00:48:19 | |
| Writing them a ticket right, right at Ventura and Park Rd. So, so we've been, we've been using the motorcycle enforcement to to | 00:48:26 | |
| sort of focus on Ventura Rd. because it was we were just seeing a lot of people there just really speeding at. | 00:48:33 | |
| A high rate of speed. So we're trying to. | 00:48:42 | |
| Prioritize that area for the motorcycle enforcement. | 00:48:44 | |
| I think it's for the Navy base personnel, which, you know, there, there are good citizens. We want to serve them when they're | 00:48:47 | |
| here. We, I had some friends who just moved from the Navy base down to Magoo because it was just so loud. | 00:48:55 | |
| It was the revving of engines, yeah. I don't know if it was racing, but it was the revving of engines at stoplights. | 00:49:03 | |
| And so that was sort of electric vehicles will get rid of that problem long term. | 00:49:09 | |
| I've noticed a big decrease in the loud cars. | 00:49:16 | |
| I think that the motors have. | 00:49:22 | |
| Put the message out, we're looking for you and we're catching some of you. So although it's still really irritating, I'm not | 00:49:26 | |
| seeing the same level of Donuts and I've seen people race on Ventura Rd. like I used to and and the loud. | 00:49:32 | |
| One of my ranchers in Camarillo, she bought her son a brand new BMW. | 00:49:43 | |
| 18 E 21 here. So he went and popped holes in the muffler so it makes noise. It's like. | 00:49:49 | |
| Yeah, it's like, Oh my God. | 00:49:56 | |
| What's the what is the new BMW exhaust system cost? But I think I think if we can get the police to start pulling people over for | 00:49:59 | |
| noise, it's one thing to get a ticket. It's another thing if they got to put $3000 back in there exhaust system to to pass for | 00:50:05 | |
| they can pop holes in it again and and do it again. I live a block off of. | 00:50:12 | |
| Pleasant Valley and when that light at Pleasant Valley and Jay is green they just. | 00:50:19 | |
| Very loudly and we all looked at each other and we were like, we, we got it. That's the next thing we got to get a strategy on. | 00:50:56 | |
| So, so I know that they're already talking about it so. | 00:51:01 | |
| Well, the one thing I have learned about our new chief is every time I bring something up to him, he's already like a month and a | 00:51:08 | |
| half ahead of me. I got the sense that they've already started trying to figure out how to deal with it, you know, But it was like | 00:51:13 | |
| we had to stop our conversation for the vehicle that was 100 feet away. And we all were just like, no, that we got to figure this | 00:51:18 | |
| out, you know, so. | 00:51:24 | |
| OK. Well, I think with that general direction that's very helpful to us and especially I think that that that. | 00:51:32 | |
| You know, this is a good start, but the consensus that and if need be, you know with the rest of the budget and how that looks | 00:51:41 | |
| that we will make sure to prioritize the public safety aspect of it so we can take that direction. I don't think we need a motion | 00:51:47 | |
| at this point. I think it's just general direction. | 00:51:54 | |
| And if everybody's ready, we can move to item 3. | 00:52:01 | |
| And item 3 we will need a motion for, but this is just part of again, trying to be proactive, trying to plan, trying to make sure | 00:52:07 | |
| that that we're planning for the year. So we brought our. | 00:52:13 | |
| Proposed quarterly meeting times and dates and we essentially. | 00:52:22 | |
| Tried to schedule it the last Wednesday at 5:00 PM except for in December because the last Wednesday's ends up being Christmas or | 00:52:29 | |
| Christmas Eve and so in December it'd be December 17th. | 00:52:36 | |
| That one we specifically wanted to call out because I know some people travel, you know, around that period. So if any of these, | 00:52:44 | |
| but particularly December, if we needed to move it up even a week, that could be something we can do relatively easily. But as of | 00:52:50 | |
| now, we have proposed these meeting dates for for next year and that March meeting date would be the one where we'd really dig | 00:52:56 | |
| into the budget, so. | 00:53:02 | |
| So if there is a motion to approve this schedule. | 00:53:09 | |
| Or a motion to change anything and then approve the schedule that can be done at this time. | 00:53:13 | |
| Would anybody like to change? | 00:53:19 | |
| Motion to approve. | 00:53:25 | |
| 2nd the motion. | 00:53:27 | |
| All in favor. All in favor, aye. | 00:53:29 | |
| And all opposed. | 00:53:32 | |
| All right, hearing none. The calendar is approved and we will meet again on March 26th. I do have one question. We've had a change | 00:53:34 | |
| in the council members, Bobby Martinez's left and Louise, Jess Lopez, Jeff Lopez is in. So we're all appointed by somebody. So I | 00:53:42 | |
| assume that doesn't affect anybody except whoever Bobby. | 00:53:50 | |
| I'm nominated by Bobby. | 00:54:03 | |
| Believe it was member Villanueva. | 00:54:06 | |
| I believe. | 00:54:10 | |
| And but. | 00:54:12 | |
| Nothing's changed yet. The new council member will be sworn in next Monday. | 00:54:14 | |
| And then the item for them to either confirm or change any appointments will come to the council. I think we're planning January | 00:54:20 | |
| 6th at this point. So nothing, it's possible that you know, nothing changes, but we'll know for sure January 6th. He has the | 00:54:26 | |
| option of picking somebody else. He has the opportunity to say, you know, oh, I know I have the perfect person that I want to put | 00:54:32 | |
| on this board. That's. | 00:54:38 | |
| Keeping you here if you want to do that, because you show up and you do your duty so. | 00:54:45 | |
| So that would be January 6, Yeah. And we'll make sure the way it works is that and it's not just this board, but basically all our | 00:54:51 | |
| boards. | 00:54:55 | |
| Will bring a list of them with all the appointments to the council. We'll say we have a new council member and then they get to | 00:55:02 | |
| propose any changes. Then after that meeting we'll like get in contact with anybody who is reappointed or not reappointed. So, so, | 00:55:09 | |
| so that would be January 6th and then we don't have another meeting till March 26th. | 00:55:15 | |
| So I'm guessing by March 26 we'll have known for quite a while. | 00:55:22 | |
| So, so I'll keep everybody in the loop though after January 6th, we'll let everybody know if there's been any change or anything | 00:55:31 | |
| like that. | 00:55:35 | |
| OK, can I have a motion to close the meeting? | 00:55:41 | |
| I make the motion to close the meeting. | 00:55:48 | |
| 2nd. | 00:55:50 | |
| All in favor. | 00:55:52 | |
| Get to use this. | 00:55:55 | |
| Thank you all for coming. Thank you. | 00:55:58 |
* use Ctrl+F (Cmd+F on Mac) to search in document
Loading...
* use Ctrl+F (Cmd+F on Mac) to search in document
Loading...
* use Ctrl+F (Cmd+F on Mac) to search in document
Loading...
Transcript
| Start Over Again Notice is hereby given that a special meeting of the Transaction and Use Tax Citizens Oversight Committee is | 00:02:27 | |
| hereby called to be held on Wednesday, December 11th, 2024 at 5:00. | 00:02:35 | |
| In the Fort Wayne city. | 00:02:43 | |
| Hall Chamber located at 250 N Ventura Rd. Fort Wayne, California. | 00:02:46 | |
| Set a special meeting shall be for the purpose of conducting business in accordance with the attached agenda. | 00:02:54 | |
| So I'll call her to order. | 00:02:59 | |
| Roll call, roll call. OK, I'll be handling roll call today. | 00:03:03 | |
| Member Diaz. Member Villanueva. | 00:03:09 | |
| Member Villanueva's app sync right? | 00:03:14 | |
| She may come later. Remember Victoria here. Vice Chair Williams here, Chair Scrivener here. Thank you. | 00:03:16 | |
| OK, Apparently there's no public comment unless an event thing been submitted to anybody. That OK? No public comment. OK, consent | 00:03:28 | |
| calendar. | 00:03:33 | |
| All matters listed in the Consent Calendar are to be considered routine. | 00:03:38 | |
| By government body and will be enacted in one motion. | 00:03:43 | |
| In the form listed, there are no discussions of these items before governing body votes on a motion to adopt. | 00:03:47 | |
| Specific items are removed from the consent calendar on separate motions. | 00:03:55 | |
| So we basically have the minutes. | 00:04:00 | |
| Just the minutes. | 00:04:04 | |
| And I'll note, I'll note for the record, board member Villanueva is present. So all five members are present. | 00:04:08 | |
| OK, so do we need to take a vote on this? | 00:04:15 | |
| Yeah, just. | 00:04:19 | |
| Yeah, just yes, a motion and a vote please. I do have a motion to. | 00:04:22 | |
| Accept. | 00:04:28 | |
| I make a motion to accept the minutes. | 00:04:29 | |
| Thank you all. All opposed. | 00:04:33 | |
| All in favor. Thank you. | 00:04:37 | |
| OK. Business items, initial measure you committee review and I just wanted to let you know that we have a special visitor here | 00:04:42 | |
| today. | 00:04:46 | |
| Congratulations. | 00:04:58 | |
| So the record will reflect 1/6 board. | 00:04:59 | |
| You only get one vote though. | 00:05:03 | |
| OK. So we have our chart up in front of us here. The measure you actual expense in a fiscal year 223 and 24, Yes, and I'll give a | 00:05:10 | |
| brief report. We have two items on the agenda today and both are are we'll try to keep them simple brief. | 00:05:20 | |
| But obviously we'll answer any questions. | 00:05:32 | |
| Really the. | 00:05:36 | |
| Today is kind of the meeting to set the stage for the next year. I think we've talked a lot over the last 18 months about the goal | 00:05:38 | |
| of we've all had of Measure U committee being ahead of the game and not, not, not simply. | 00:05:46 | |
| Approving past information, but actually being proactive and being able to to preview the information and provide guidance as part | 00:05:56 | |
| of that process. And so today's agenda is actually with that intent. | 00:06:03 | |
| We're looking forward to next year. The first item is kind of getting general big picture guidance from the. | 00:06:10 | |
| Committee, as we start our budget process, you know we talked about you know December's kind of the the calm before the storm and | 00:06:20 | |
| then we really start usually we start right about now with really starting to put the budget together and starting to get an | 00:06:26 | |
| initial draft of the budget and so. | 00:06:32 | |
| We talked about, well, should we like you know. | 00:06:40 | |
| Come to the committee in March and come with a proposed budget or for the first time this year, we said let's actually come to the | 00:06:44 | |
| committee now and say as we're starting to put the budget together, you know, we want to make sure we're kind. We're going in the | 00:06:50 | |
| direction that the committee wants to go in. And so, you know, rather than bring a document and have to work backwards, let's | 00:06:56 | |
| actually get some like guidance moving forward. | 00:07:02 | |
| So the point of this business item? | 00:07:10 | |
| Initial measure you committee review and feedback on priority categories is very high level. It's essentially what we did was we | 00:07:15 | |
| looked back at the last two years and this chart shows the last two years and we looked at OK, where have we? | 00:07:21 | |
| Prioritized, what areas have we prioritized with measure you funding and in what amounts? And then looking at the next year and | 00:07:30 | |
| what we're expecting with next year, what kind of revenues we're expecting to get it, you know, are these the same areas we want | 00:07:35 | |
| to prioritize? | 00:07:40 | |
| Next year or do we want to, you know, just kind of at a high level, do we want to make any changes or are we comfortable with the | 00:07:46 | |
| same approach? And so this chart off the top shows. | 00:07:53 | |
| You know the four priority areas of Measure you funding and over the last couple of years. | 00:08:00 | |
| We have per this chart prioritized the, I would say the public safety has been the highest level priority. You can see for the | 00:08:07 | |
| chart that in 2023 that was about $1.6 million of, you know, generally you know, 3 to $3.5 million total. So that's about 1.6 | 00:08:15 | |
| million or about half of the funding goes to public safety. | 00:08:24 | |
| And then you can see streets and maintenance gets about maybe 1/4. | 00:08:33 | |
| Maybe a little less than a quarter $700,000 CIP has has gotten got about 700,000 two years ago, but. | 00:08:38 | |
| It's a little complicated. I try to, we try to really like keep these like simple, but inevitably some things get complicated | 00:08:51 | |
| because capital improvement projects include projects that also are in these other categories. So it's kind of like double | 00:08:56 | |
| counting, you know, our. | 00:09:02 | |
| Maybe double counting or the opposite, but but a CIP, the reason why the CIP increased so much where you can see from the first | 00:09:10 | |
| year to the second year that had the biggest increase was because of the Bubbling Springs Park project. So if you recall last year | 00:09:16 | |
| we came to the committee and we said, you know, the Bubbling Springs Park project is over budget and you know, if if it we had a | 00:09:22 | |
| long conversation about it. Does this fit the, you know, the. | 00:09:28 | |
| Is this a priority? Is this something that the measure you funds that you would support using measure you funds for? And so the | 00:09:36 | |
| good news with that is we're on pace to finish the project in March ish. But everything we've actually kept everything on pace. We | 00:09:43 | |
| are on schedule as of right this minute, even though just a little off off the point, but the that park is right next to that | 00:09:49 | |
| Creek and every time we dig. | 00:09:56 | |
| It's. | 00:10:04 | |
| It's, you know, we hold our breaths because you don't know what when you're going to dig in the Creek starts bubbling up or | 00:10:06 | |
| anything like that. But we've been able to keep it on pace. But so that's due to be done in March. So that this chart shows that | 00:10:11 | |
| that had a spike, but I think that was a one year situation because of bubbling springs and we would anticipate that that would | 00:10:17 | |
| start to drop again this year and that we would be sort of deprioritized again. | 00:10:23 | |
| Yes. | 00:10:30 | |
| So as I recall. | 00:10:33 | |
| When we did an audit and found out where all the money had gone, you know, over the past several years, we didn't have any access | 00:10:36 | |
| to, we had, we had about $1.7 million leftover and it seemed like a worthy choice to put that towards the capital improvements in | 00:10:43 | |
| the parks, which I think we're all pretty happy with. And I don't anticipate to spending, you know, 15 more $1,000,000 on any | 00:10:49 | |
| parks anytime soon, not anytime soon. | 00:10:56 | |
| 2040 is not down and whatever, but yeah. | 00:11:03 | |
| So let me say, I think that's a one time spike. Yeah. And I wanted to ask where are we with on budget with the park? It seems like | 00:11:07 | |
| anytime we do construction, it always runs over. So we're on budget with what we. | 00:11:13 | |
| You know, if you remember that conversation was us coming back and saying we need to be realistic about the budget. | 00:11:21 | |
| I think the initial budget estimate was $9 million and we were, you know. | 00:11:27 | |
| We had the conversation, then we called all the contractors in and. | 00:11:32 | |
| Just my conversation with them is if you put an estimate together for $9 million five years ago, it's not $9 million anymore. And | 00:11:36 | |
| so we came back and we revised our estimates. | 00:11:41 | |
| And we came back at 15,000,000 and right now we're right on 15,000,000. So the positive is I think instead of waiting to be kind | 00:11:47 | |
| of, you know, to get reality thrown at us, we actually proactively, you know, came back and said we need to be realistic with this | 00:11:54 | |
| budget. So, so we're right on pace with that. We're on pace with the schedule, we're on pace with the budget. So it's actually | 00:12:02 | |
| working, sticking within that. And then if anybody saw last week's council meeting, the Little League was here. | 00:12:09 | |
| We're finalizing all the agreements for them to actually be able to start playing again as soon as it opens. So I think we're kind | 00:12:17 | |
| of on schedule with where we need to be with that. So that was a one year spike. It won't be that way. Well, we don't anticipate | 00:12:23 | |
| and we don't actually propose continuing at that level. And one of the next slides will show that number coming back down from 1.7 | 00:12:29 | |
| back to about the the original number. | 00:12:36 | |
| I think it's the next slide after this. | 00:12:43 | |
| That one, yeah. So this is as of right this minute based on the projects that we had proposed to the council like for our capital | 00:12:46 | |
| improvement project plan, these are the projects scheduled for next year and then these are the ones whether the project scheduled | 00:12:55 | |
| that would use measure you funding and so the number drops back to 836,000 so. | 00:13:04 | |
| The the CIP, which became the second largest chunk of funding for Measure U. It would go back down, which. | 00:13:13 | |
| Which we would anticipate then would allow for some of the other areas to be funded. But the, So the list of projects for 26 I'll | 00:13:22 | |
| just explain briefly the $194,000 every year for five years we had a parking lot budget to where we divided out all the parking | 00:13:29 | |
| lots we had with the idea of having all the parking lots maintained and repaved. And so next year would be some of the beach | 00:13:36 | |
| parking lots, the library, which. | 00:13:44 | |
| We had started to complete this year but when they closed we put it on hold till till their constructions done so that would be | 00:13:51 | |
| next year. And then some parks parking lots like the Bubbling Springs Park parking lot for example. | 00:13:57 | |
| So that would be 194,000 of that 830,000. | 00:14:04 | |
| Pedestrian lighting at Bulker Park, $50,000. | 00:14:08 | |
| The Lifeguard building roof repairs at Wyoming Beach, $35,000. | 00:14:13 | |
| Miranda park building engineering and remodel $45,000 that one I just have to be clear with everybody though, this is that | 00:14:21 | |
| building in Miranda park that I. | 00:14:26 | |
| Really we, we, the goal will be to bring that back and find some use for it. But the $45,000 is what we estimate just to do the | 00:14:32 | |
| engineering and so the the project itself. | 00:14:39 | |
| Like the next year would be the development of the plans, but the project itself wouldn't be completed next year. It's gonna be | 00:14:47 | |
| significant. The 45,000 is just the paperwork, basically. Yeah. And then the designs and figuring coming up with our designs and | 00:14:52 | |
| what we wanna do with it. | 00:14:57 | |
| So, so it's a good start, but I know that one, a lot of people have ideas. We've been approached by a lot of people who go like, | 00:15:03 | |
| hey, let us operate that building and let us do something with it. And it's like it, it needs, it needs significant repairs before | 00:15:08 | |
| we're able to do that. So. | 00:15:14 | |
| So, and then a Pearson Rd. storm drain and storm drains are one of those things that aren't glamorous. So a lot of times cities | 00:15:20 | |
| cut those and, but I try to remind everybody like that's the kind of stuff that then you, when you need them, you regret cutting | 00:15:27 | |
| it and you don't want to get into that situation. So you can see that's a big chunk of the funding, $337,000, but they're | 00:15:33 | |
| important. They're not glamorous, but they're important. | 00:15:40 | |
| And then we have $25,000 identified for electric vehicle charging stations at the beach and then $150,000 for it's actually | 00:15:47 | |
| emergency vehicle preemption traffic signals and that's. | 00:15:55 | |
| The system where the emergency vehicles can actually change the traffic signals when needed so. | 00:16:04 | |
| So that's right now what's scheduled. And so if we went back to that chart, for example, I. | 00:16:10 | |
| Back one more slide. So for CIP, again that spike, it would drop back down like what we're expecting for 2025 is that that | 00:16:18 | |
| category is going to drop back down to that 2023 level and that was just a one year increase because of the Bubbling Springs Park | 00:16:24 | |
| project. | 00:16:29 | |
| And so. | 00:16:36 | |
| Most of the other categories are pretty consistent, like streets and maintenance didn't very much. Parks and Rec varied a little | 00:16:37 | |
| bit. I would say both dropped a little bit, mostly because we allocated that funding to the Bubbling Springs Park project. So that | 00:16:44 | |
| impacted some of the other areas, but you know, they've been pretty consistent and so. | 00:16:51 | |
| We. | 00:17:02 | |
| Oh, and then the next slide, please. | 00:17:04 | |
| And so we looked at next year's. | 00:17:06 | |
| Estimate. | 00:17:10 | |
| And let me give you a little bit of information on that is what we base, where we, how we come up with this number that we | 00:17:12 | |
| estimate that Measure U revenues will be $3.1 million next year is the city actually has a contract with a company called HDL and | 00:17:20 | |
| HD LS. They're the kind of the standard most of these contract with HDL and their expertise is sales tax analysis and property tax | 00:17:27 | |
| analysis and because they contract with everyone. | 00:17:34 | |
| They see they are pretty good usually at anticipating what's gonna happen with sales tax and property tax. And so for us next | 00:17:42 | |
| year, they anticipate our sales tax is gonna be pretty flat. | 00:17:49 | |
| We aren't gonna, we don't expect growth, a lot of growth next year in sales tax and really mostly that can be attributed to the | 00:17:57 | |
| cannabis tax. | 00:18:02 | |
| We don't officially have a cannabis tax, but the cannabis revenues that we receive. And so if the cannabis revenues drop, then our | 00:18:07 | |
| sales tax drops. And just with the neighboring cities continuing to open more and more cannabis dispensaries, we think that is | 00:18:14 | |
| just going to keep being a pressure on us. So, so the revenues for next year are pretty flat. We've been at about $3.1 million | 00:18:22 | |
| last year and about $3.1 million this year and we expect to be at about 3 point. | 00:18:29 | |
| Million next year. | 00:18:37 | |
| And so that's where we start on this chart is, you know assuming that we have that we expect a $3.1 million revenue next year, | 00:18:39 | |
| then we basically took the averages from those prior charts and we said if it's $3.1 million that would be this many dollars in | 00:18:46 | |
| each of these categories based on the averages. So $1.4 million for public safety, $488,000 for streets and maintenance, $343,000 | 00:18:54 | |
| for parks and rec. | 00:19:01 | |
| $136,000 for CIP. | 00:19:09 | |
| And so that's essentially when we start with the budget and we have to make assumptions about, you know, what areas we need to | 00:19:12 | |
| fund, at what levels. This is what we would start with based on kind of the history of the measure, Measure U committee and what's | 00:19:20 | |
| been approved. And so the point of the item is to basically lay that out and then ask for feedback of is that a good starting | 00:19:27 | |
| point or you know, is it, is there an area that the committee would want us would want to focus? | 00:19:35 | |
| More so than others. | 00:19:42 | |
| So if you can go back one more time. | 00:19:45 | |
| It's it ends up the the final numbers end up. | 00:19:49 | |
| Pretty comparable to that 2023 actual, but the big biggest change from 2024 is the CIP. | 00:19:53 | |
| Dollars go down because of Boeing Springs, but also the public safety dollars would be actually a pretty significant drop from | 00:20:02 | |
| $2.2 million of Measure U to I think it was one about $1.43 million is is being suggested. So that's probably the if, if I had to | 00:20:08 | |
| anticipate what the biggest. | 00:20:15 | |
| Question would be it would probably be are the maybe the biggest discussion point would be. | 00:20:23 | |
| I think the other categories are like fairly stable or there's a good reason why it's not with the CIP category, but I think it's | 00:20:29 | |
| that public safety category. Is that the level of funding that the measure you committee would want to allocate or you know this | 00:20:38 | |
| year it was significantly higher, 2.2 million I think it was. So you know, is that an area that the committee would want to? | 00:20:46 | |
| Look at prioritizing more than. | 00:20:55 | |
| Just based on the average in the past. So, so that's again, it's high level. It's sort of, you know, kind of tell us if we're | 00:20:58 | |
| going in the right direction because now we're going to kind of get into the nitty gritty and actually go through line items and | 00:21:04 | |
| try to, you know, kind of. | 00:21:09 | |
| Allocate these dollars into the budget. And so we're just looking for that general feedback. | 00:21:17 | |
| So did the federal grant that we got for the project, did we meet the deadline? So we got all the funding from them. So Angela | 00:21:23 | |
| gets to brag that she opened a, what is it, a $6 million check this week, A lovely $6 million. | 00:21:32 | |
| And so that one I, I want to give credit because. | 00:21:41 | |
| I'm not. | 00:21:49 | |
| Confident right now that with everything going on at the state and federal level that we, that we, we may, there may be grant | 00:21:51 | |
| impacts, you know, some of the grants that have been issued in the past could be pulled, you know, could be cancelled or even | 00:21:58 | |
| dollars that have been promised could be pulled back. So we made sure that we build everything as soon as we as soon as we did it | 00:22:05 | |
| on the project, we build it and we got the, the biggest chunk of the money in so. | 00:22:12 | |
| So that was good proactive work by our finance department. And so for us, we at this point, I think we've got almost every dollar | 00:22:20 | |
| from the federal grant, right. | 00:22:26 | |
| I think there was like maybe like less than $1,000,000 left or something like that. So, so we've we've been able to get that done | 00:22:33 | |
| before there's any talk of polling grants back or anything like that. | 00:22:39 | |
| Great, I had heard some cheering over this way. I wondered what it was. | 00:22:45 | |
| It is. It's just me. Yeah. We don't, we don't get the, you know, you get used to seeing bigger numbers, but we don't see $6 | 00:22:53 | |
| million checks very often, so. | 00:22:58 | |
| I noticed that we're. | 00:23:06 | |
| Putting electric vehicle charging station and. | 00:23:09 | |
| I want to understand the strategy there. I I don't, I don't pay any money for a gas station. Why are we? | 00:23:17 | |
| Holding those folks out, I have an electric vehicle, but I, I don't, I'm not, I don't need an electric vehicle station around | 00:23:26 | |
| here. So what's that about? What's the strategy? Is it a money maker? No, it's not a money maker. And that's a that's a big | 00:23:33 | |
| question that you could get different answers from different people on, but I'll tell you the I'll tell you the best answers that | 00:23:39 | |
| I've heard is. | 00:23:45 | |
| And. | 00:23:53 | |
| When electric vehicle chargers were first becoming, our electric vehicles were first kind of becoming, you know, more popular a | 00:23:57 | |
| lot of cities. | 00:24:02 | |
| Adopted like policies or statements that because of the environmental impact, positive environmental impact of driving a zero or | 00:24:09 | |
| low emission vehicle, that cities were going to be supportive of electric vehicle infrastructure and install electric vehicle | 00:24:17 | |
| infrastructure. | 00:24:24 | |
| A lot of cities, most cities, I would say from about 2015 to 2020, a lot of cities that installed them actually installed it with | 00:24:33 | |
| free electricity, which was something that was was not sustainable. And I was working in a city that had installed free chargers | 00:24:40 | |
| and had to be the person to break the news that you can't afford to keep paying for people's electricity. And so, so most cities | 00:24:48 | |
| at this point have now started to charge. | 00:24:55 | |
| The cost of the electricity and so, but it's not a money maker. I'm not really aware of any city that actually like charges enough | 00:25:03 | |
| to make any profit off of it. But I think that the general, you know, there's, there's a lot to it, but I think the general | 00:25:10 | |
| response from cities would be, well, you know, we adopted as a policy a statement that we wanted to support electric vehicles to | 00:25:17 | |
| reduce the greenhouse gases in our community or, you know, something along those lines. | 00:25:24 | |
| So. | 00:25:32 | |
| So that's the thought. And so we as a city have. | 00:25:33 | |
| Plans that call for installation of chargers at certain locations. Interesting. Like interestingly enough, when you mention it, | 00:25:38 | |
| because that is probably the one project on this list that I did a little bit of a double take at is that now home charging is | 00:25:45 | |
| becoming so prevalent that it's like you start to think, well, maybe maybe those plans that we had initially are kind of outdated | 00:25:51 | |
| now, you know? | 00:25:57 | |
| But, and so it's something. | 00:26:05 | |
| Something we've talked about internally and it's like, well, how many vehicles, chargers do we need? And I don't think we need as | 00:26:07 | |
| many as we thought we needed. | 00:26:11 | |
| Because if you remember when electric vehicles first came out, it was like cities were trying to jam in chargers as much as | 00:26:15 | |
| possible. But a lot of people just charge at home now. | 00:26:18 | |
| So I think for us, we still have a couple in key locations. We have plans to put a couple at Bubbling Springs Park eventually. | 00:26:23 | |
| That was actually part of the grant. And so it's actually a grant requirement now that we had proposed it back in 2017 or whenever | 00:26:30 | |
| that grant application went in. And then we had planned to put a couple at the beach. And so we don't actually have a whole lot | 00:26:37 | |
| planned, but those ones are part of the plan. So we have them in our capital improvement project plan, so. | 00:26:44 | |
| I wonder why they can't be profitable because if you have an EV and you get some location you realize you don't have enough fuel, | 00:26:51 | |
| you'd be thrilled to pay anything. | 00:26:57 | |
| To charge them so I, I don't know if the consumer would be hurt when they were told your choices pay this amount or go home and | 00:27:02 | |
| push the car home and so they would pay I think they could be profitable if you can change the meters. One of the challenges for | 00:27:10 | |
| cities to to bear in mind and you know, it's funny because I think you've identified like a, like a, what's it called a gap in the | 00:27:17 | |
| market. Somebody out there can. | 00:27:25 | |
| You know, and I keep saying this, I keep waiting for a gas station to convert a couple of spaces to electric and, you know, and | 00:27:32 | |
| actually make some money off of it. But for cities, as a general rule, we are not able to charge for service. We provide more than | 00:27:39 | |
| the cost of the service itself. And so cities, we really can't make profits. It's almost it's, you know, we're, we're a public | 00:27:46 | |
| service, so. | 00:27:53 | |
| Can you charge for the cost of installing? | 00:28:01 | |
| I mean, if you cost $10,000 to install one of these things, can you put that you could build that into the cost. So since we can | 00:28:04 | |
| recover the cost of service, we could say we're gonna charge for electricity, we're gonna, every person who charges is gonna pay, | 00:28:10 | |
| you know, .0001% of the installation cost as well. And you can recover the cost back. So, so that that is possible over what time | 00:28:16 | |
| period? | 00:28:23 | |
| 5-10 years, what is it? | 00:28:29 | |
| Normally when we do rate studies, we do, we do most of them on like kind of a five year cycle. So probably that it's technical and | 00:28:33 | |
| there might be some ability to adjust that. But normally we do things over A5 year periods. And as an example, we went to council | 00:28:40 | |
| last week to talk about our utility rates and we're in the council approved that we're going to do a five year study for our | 00:28:47 | |
| utility rates. So we we tend to do 5 year cycles. Very good. Thank you. | 00:28:54 | |
| I one more comment. | 00:29:02 | |
| With all the new building going in, there's not enough parking to start with. People don't have a garage to park in and charge in. | 00:29:05 | |
| So it really occurred to me I've been thinking about this lately. What happens to people who live in apartments? Who. | 00:29:12 | |
| Don't can't just plug into their home thing. | 00:29:20 | |
| So they got to go find some place to charge up and. | 00:29:23 | |
| That's why we talked about this internally and we were talking about, you know what, we might not need hundreds of charging | 00:29:27 | |
| stations, but on the flip side, you know, some people's opinion at the we've heard some feedback where people go, hey, you know, | 00:29:33 | |
| it seems like people have enough charges right now. But the reality is our our kind of opinion was looking at our community and | 00:29:39 | |
| the fact that we have a lot of. | 00:29:46 | |
| Like condo complexes? Townhome complexes with homeowners associations. | 00:29:53 | |
| To the public, but ensuring we have enough that the people who need them have access to them. | 00:30:27 | |
| So Surfside One condominiums, they have them now and they're profitable on those. | 00:30:32 | |
| And so it serves their little community there. But also if you just charge off a of 110 volts in your garage overnight, you'll get | 00:30:39 | |
| enough charge to take you a number of miles. I mean, we're talking about under pain on the car, but I think you could get. | 00:30:49 | |
| 1/2 charge, that would be about 150 miles. So unless you're commuting a long distance, that sort of maintains it for you just with | 00:31:05 | |
| 110 Volt power. | 00:31:11 | |
| So. | 00:31:21 | |
| These. | 00:31:24 | |
| The charging stations you're talking about at the beach, would they be, they'd be inside the lot. And so would people also have to | 00:31:25 | |
| get a parking permit as well, right? Yes. Is that what you're talking about? Yes and so. | 00:31:32 | |
| It can be set up a couple ways and I don't remember off the top with the plan. I think that the way it works typically is they | 00:31:40 | |
| can, when they park at the charging station, they pay to park at the charging station, but they can only stay in that spot while | 00:31:46 | |
| they're charging and then they need to move. And then they would have to buy a parking permit. And so the cost of the permit would | 00:31:53 | |
| be built into the cost of the charging. | 00:31:59 | |
| So. | 00:32:07 | |
| And then is there an indicator so when, when the parking lady goes by, she can see that it's fully charged or something? I don't | 00:32:08 | |
| know how those work. Yeah, yeah, potentially they do. I mean, you go to the beach and you could forget, you know, just like you | 00:32:15 | |
| forget you only have a 2 hour, you know, permit or yeah, they're, they're pretty fancy. Now there's things they have some of them | 00:32:23 | |
| will have lights saying that they're fully charged. You know, they all have. | 00:32:30 | |
| Screens that will say whether they're charging or fully charged, and then a lot of them too now. | 00:32:38 | |
| I think the ones we have at City Hall do this. If, if you're fully charged, it'll actually e-mail you and tell you or send you a | 00:32:45 | |
| notification on your phone. You know your car is ready, please move it, that kind of a thing. So I know Tesla has a simple system. | 00:32:53 | |
| That when you are full. | 00:33:01 | |
| They start charging you idle fees. That's probably something at a dollar a minute. | 00:33:05 | |
| To encourage you to move your vehicle and so you get it out of there, you pay attention to it, it's on your shoulders to time it. | 00:33:11 | |
| So I, I would like that for us, if it's idle, charge them. That's probably how we address that. You know, the concern, if the | 00:33:17 | |
| concern is that, you know, people will figure out, well, if I park there and I put the plug in, then I don't have to pay for | 00:33:24 | |
| parking. You're probably going to end up paying more if you do that. | 00:33:30 | |
| So as far as this project is concerned. | 00:33:39 | |
| Say five years down the road, are they still going to be using these chargers? This thing is going to evolve into something else | 00:33:43 | |
| that they're going to have to pull these out and put a newer one. Yeah, that's always the concern with these. And there are like | 00:33:49 | |
| the two standards right now and, and the ones we have are the there's the Tesla standard that is for Tesla's and then there's the | 00:33:56 | |
| one that's for everybody else. The ones we install are the ones for everybody else. | 00:34:02 | |
| And both cars. | 00:34:09 | |
| Both ways you can get at the adapter, so you could use the other one, but typically cities typically don't install the Tesla ones | 00:34:12 | |
| because they're seen as just being exclusive and only beneficial to Tesla drivers. You know, I'm just thinking, you know, we're | 00:34:17 | |
| spending money on these and in five years we're going to have to put in something else because I think it's going to evolve that | 00:34:23 | |
| quick that we don't want to do. | 00:34:29 | |
| Because we have to swap the units, it'll be a few $1000, but it should be minor. So we have all our master plan documents and some | 00:35:05 | |
| of them include sort of the plan to get the infrastructure out there. | 00:35:12 | |
| So I don't know if there's a consensus, but. | 00:35:20 | |
| You can talk about this. It seems like if we can build the cost of paying for this into the user fee, that way we're not | 00:35:23 | |
| subsidizing anybody and the money is there to swap it out the next time around. | 00:35:29 | |
| I think I'm hearing that, yeah. And I think that's that's in line with, no, I agree. Yeah, Yeah, I'll sit there. Yeah, exactly. I | 00:35:38 | |
| have another thing that I'd like to discuss here for a second on the capital improvement. | 00:35:45 | |
| We need a traffic light at Lido and Channel Islands Blvd. | 00:35:54 | |
| I have a. | 00:35:58 | |
| Rental house over on Bulker and I've had a lot of experience here. It's next impossible to get out many times on Channel Islands | 00:36:00 | |
| Blvd. and there's a series of wrecks there that happen all the time. I think the people coming out of. | 00:36:06 | |
| Wanami Bay or also kind of in a situation. So what's happening is I've lived here a long time with Channel Islands Blvd. Used to | 00:36:14 | |
| be you could play hockey out there and now it's just it's a constant. We've got the traffic speeds down, but. | 00:36:22 | |
| Housing developments going in, this whole thing at the harbor, there's going to be lots more traffic going there and that's a | 00:36:31 | |
| that's a particularly dangerous area. For one point, there was like a week or a record to a week over there. I'm looking at what | 00:36:37 | |
| insurance company should pay for a light there because it would save them some money. It was pretty bad. I haven't been over there | 00:36:43 | |
| much recently, but I'd like to throw that out as maybe. | 00:36:50 | |
| A potential capital improvement. I don't know what other people think. | 00:36:57 | |
| Yeah, and we. | 00:37:02 | |
| There was actually when I first arrived, I think we had three accidents in two weeks there. And, and for me it was, it was | 00:37:04 | |
| surprising because. | 00:37:08 | |
| A lot of people know I lived here for 10 years and then became city manager somewhere else. And so then I moved there and then I | 00:37:14 | |
| came back. I came back to work here and now I need to figure out how to move back here and so but. | 00:37:20 | |
| So I had lived here and I never thought of that area is particularly dangerous. It wasn't. And I came back and we had three | 00:37:27 | |
| accidents in two weeks. So, so we did, we went out, we restriped, we added the keep clear area and we, we lowered the speed limit. | 00:37:33 | |
| So we did a few things in it and it's definitely. | 00:37:39 | |
| We aren't getting 3 accidents in two weeks anymore, but it's an area we get a lot of questions about and we hear about so. So has | 00:37:45 | |
| there been a? | 00:37:49 | |
| Has there been a study, have you seen the difference with lowering the speed limit? Yeah, we've definitely seen an improvement | 00:37:55 | |
| since then. And. | 00:37:59 | |
| The we've seen an improvement, I think to member Scrivener's point is 11 little like fact to keep in mind that that I I think we | 00:38:05 | |
| almost like all like naturally know, but we never talk about is that that intersection of Channel Islands and Ventura is actually | 00:38:13 | |
| one of the busiest intersections in the county. I think it's the number 2 busiest intersection in the county. | 00:38:21 | |
| The intersection of Channel Islands and Ventura is is what second busiest intersection in the county? Yeah. | 00:38:31 | |
| And so, so we, we, we did those things. It's definitely made a difference. Like we haven't had the accidents at nearly the same | 00:38:37 | |
| rate we were having before. But it is a kind of a area for us that we're, we're continuing to watch it. And like, we know we might | 00:38:45 | |
| need to keep adjusting if it just keeps getting more and more busy, you know? And so there's a couple things like Mr. Scrivener | 00:38:52 | |
| mentioned, the there are plans to do something big at the harbor. And if that happens, that could bring more traffic. I'm not. | 00:39:00 | |
| My breath on that one because I think there's been plans to do something big at the harbor for 20 years now, but it doesn't look | 00:39:07 | |
| like a good idea. The idea that they picked is surprised me. So I guess we'll see if it goes anywhere. But so that's an area, I | 00:39:15 | |
| think that's an area that we will continue to watch and keep an eye on and. | 00:39:22 | |
| I think at this point with this being like the high level discussion, it's like I think it's appropriate if you want to give some | 00:39:31 | |
| general. | 00:39:34 | |
| Areas to focus on like that, then we can kind of take it back and try to figure out how we can build things in and and all and you | 00:39:40 | |
| know, kind of start planning for so. | 00:39:45 | |
| So can I ask, how do people feel about the balance of? | 00:39:50 | |
| Projected income for different category to go back to us. | 00:39:54 | |
| So with. | 00:40:01 | |
| What did you call it? A. | 00:40:05 | |
| Flat revenue projection for this year and looking at the. | 00:40:07 | |
| The lower proportions, how is that going to because for me public safety is is the biggest priority and I think we've done a good | 00:40:17 | |
| job for them so far. How is that projection, whatever that amount is you've projected for this? Yeah, coming here for the fourteen | 00:40:26 | |
| 1,000,431, how is that going to affect their overall budget is that. | 00:40:34 | |
| Yeah. And you know, one thing I didn't say and I think it's essentially where you're going is. | 00:40:44 | |
| You know. | 00:40:50 | |
| Our sales tax revenue is flat. It's going to be tight this year for us as a city. | 00:40:51 | |
| Our our budget was very tight last year. We were essentially. | 00:40:59 | |
| We we cut $3,000,000 out of the budget to stay balanced last year. | 00:41:08 | |
| And looking ahead? | 00:41:14 | |
| If you're looking ahead and you're expecting your biggest revenue sales tax to stay flat, but we all know costs are going up right | 00:41:17 | |
| now and inflation and everything, we expect costs to go up, let's let's say conservatively 5% while you're starting with the 5% | 00:41:23 | |
| deficit. So, so we do expect the budget to be very tight. | 00:41:30 | |
| And so I think maybe to maybe the best answer to I think the where you're going with that is that if. | 00:41:38 | |
| Public safety is the priority for Measure U. That would be like, that would be like a perfect example of the feedback to us | 00:41:48 | |
| because then we can make sure when we're doing the budget that we make that the priority for Measure U. | 00:41:53 | |
| And so although. | 00:42:00 | |
| It's hard to get into the the weeds with that right now because you only have a chunk of the budget in front of you, not the whole | 00:42:04 | |
| thing. I think it's going to be very tight and I think that that would be whatever maybe a good way to approach it is whatever is | 00:42:10 | |
| the priority measure, you identifies that and then we'll make sure it's the priority. I think that's kind of the high level | 00:42:15 | |
| guidance at this point, so. | 00:42:20 | |
| Priorities. | 00:42:27 | |
| What do you think? | 00:42:28 | |
| I think we've seen that this looks sort of like a standard other than this one change we had in CIP that. | 00:42:32 | |
| But we knew that was coming. | 00:42:38 | |
| So that looks like a good. | 00:42:41 | |
| Distribution between the four different. | 00:42:42 | |
| I also agree. I believe it's. | 00:42:54 | |
| It I agree with public safety being the top priority. | 00:42:59 | |
| Yeah, the way they're prioritized right there, you can see that that. | 00:43:05 | |
| The road we should be going. | 00:43:09 | |
| I feel like since you've come on board and the new chief has come on board, we've had kind of some remarkable changes in the whole | 00:43:14 | |
| public safety thing, which I'm very grateful for. | 00:43:19 | |
| I think everybody I've talked to is pretty happy with and if we're not safe, nothing else, nothing else matters. And I don't want | 00:43:27 | |
| to get overly paranoid and get, you know, an armed police force with, with tanks and some of the people now, but that's not the | 00:43:33 | |
| direction we're headed in. So, so basically tank would be more than 1.4 million. | 00:43:40 | |
| I think the public safety is in real public safety, not stuff that's thrown in, it's puffed, which we hear all the time, but I | 00:43:51 | |
| think from what I can see, the chiefs. | 00:43:56 | |
| Decisions have been right on and so I think my personal opinion is that's the first priority and everything else falls beyond | 00:44:02 | |
| after that. | 00:44:07 | |
| So I think. | 00:44:13 | |
| I think the sense I get. | 00:44:15 | |
| And I guess I'll ask you guys to tell me if I'm just wrong is as we start to develop the budget that. | 00:44:18 | |
| Keeping public safety is the priority. We have sort of a draft what we expect budget to look like, but if we get down the road and | 00:44:27 | |
| we realize that. | 00:44:31 | |
| You know, public safety is being shorted compared to the year before then we I think we have the support to make sure that it's | 00:44:36 | |
| the priority and that we're able to to pay for what we need for public safety. And so if that that increases a little bit and we | 00:44:41 | |
| take everything else down a little bit at that time if that's what's needed, it sounds like the committee supports that, but we'll | 00:44:47 | |
| try to start with this and see where that gets us and then. | 00:44:53 | |
| I think with the process, we're planning to come back, but the next item we'll get to a minute is sets the meeting calendar. But | 00:44:59 | |
| we'd be coming back in March with, with the, with the, you know, the detail to it. And we'd come back and we can say if we were | 00:45:05 | |
| able to make everything work at these levels or if we needed to adjust public safety up and everything else down a little bit. | 00:45:12 | |
| OK, great. OK with everybody. Yes. | 00:45:19 | |
| In public safety was that? | 00:45:23 | |
| Donut ******** ******** nation of the Kirby Was that in those funds? Is that oh the traffic don't the traffic donut pilot project? | 00:45:27 | |
| That wasn't this fund actually that we were able to do that with, it would have been our streets and maintenance and then we | 00:45:42 | |
| actually have applied for a grant for to hopefully cover the cost of that and maybe. | 00:45:49 | |
| If we decided to try a second location, we've had some requests from some neighborhoods for a second location of of that. So, so | 00:45:56 | |
| that shouldn't come out of the public safety funding. So well, that's been highly successful. Everyone's noticed it's changed that | 00:46:05 | |
| a lot. And also places like right in front of the Surfside Seafood, I noticed they have moved over there. | 00:46:13 | |
| And so some curbing there would be a similar type of stuff and it's low, I think it's low maintenance. | 00:46:22 | |
| Yeah. We, what we came up with was pretty low cost, pretty low maintenance. We wanted to test it, but we figured. | 00:46:29 | |
| That would be wonderful. And it appears that the fire department's happy with that type of curbing. It doesn't slow them down and. | 00:47:08 | |
| It's also it can be camouflaged because especially like in front of Surfside Seafood, it can be put between the parking spots so | 00:47:17 | |
| that still people can come and go. No one's going to run over that little curb. If they do, it doesn't hurt their car, but it | 00:47:24 | |
| still keeps the. | 00:47:31 | |
| I don't know, crazy teenagers out of there. So the only thing is if we could employ that type of curbing other places so that we | 00:47:38 | |
| get out of the race car syndrome. | 00:47:45 | |
| Down. | 00:47:52 | |
| Ventura Rd. | 00:47:54 | |
| I've heard complaints from the Navy base, the people that live over there, it's just horrible for them. Ventura Roads a challenge. | 00:47:56 | |
| We I. | 00:48:02 | |
| We brought back motorcycle enforcement and hopefully you've seen them. I've seen them because I drive Ventura Rd. every day, but | 00:48:08 | |
| they are out there every day. And in fact today we had our employee appreciation event and when I came out they had just pulled | 00:48:14 | |
| somebody over and were. | 00:48:19 | |
| Writing them a ticket right, right at Ventura and Park Rd. So, so we've been, we've been using the motorcycle enforcement to to | 00:48:26 | |
| sort of focus on Ventura Rd. because it was we were just seeing a lot of people there just really speeding at. | 00:48:33 | |
| A high rate of speed. So we're trying to. | 00:48:42 | |
| Prioritize that area for the motorcycle enforcement. | 00:48:44 | |
| I think it's for the Navy base personnel, which, you know, there, there are good citizens. We want to serve them when they're | 00:48:47 | |
| here. We, I had some friends who just moved from the Navy base down to Magoo because it was just so loud. | 00:48:55 | |
| It was the revving of engines, yeah. I don't know if it was racing, but it was the revving of engines at stoplights. | 00:49:03 | |
| And so that was sort of electric vehicles will get rid of that problem long term. | 00:49:09 | |
| I've noticed a big decrease in the loud cars. | 00:49:16 | |
| I think that the motors have. | 00:49:22 | |
| Put the message out, we're looking for you and we're catching some of you. So although it's still really irritating, I'm not | 00:49:26 | |
| seeing the same level of Donuts and I've seen people race on Ventura Rd. like I used to and and the loud. | 00:49:32 | |
| One of my ranchers in Camarillo, she bought her son a brand new BMW. | 00:49:43 | |
| 18 E 21 here. So he went and popped holes in the muffler so it makes noise. It's like. | 00:49:49 | |
| Yeah, it's like, Oh my God. | 00:49:56 | |
| What's the what is the new BMW exhaust system cost? But I think I think if we can get the police to start pulling people over for | 00:49:59 | |
| noise, it's one thing to get a ticket. It's another thing if they got to put $3000 back in there exhaust system to to pass for | 00:50:05 | |
| they can pop holes in it again and and do it again. I live a block off of. | 00:50:12 | |
| Pleasant Valley and when that light at Pleasant Valley and Jay is green they just. | 00:50:19 | |
| Very loudly and we all looked at each other and we were like, we, we got it. That's the next thing we got to get a strategy on. | 00:50:56 | |
| So, so I know that they're already talking about it so. | 00:51:01 | |
| Well, the one thing I have learned about our new chief is every time I bring something up to him, he's already like a month and a | 00:51:08 | |
| half ahead of me. I got the sense that they've already started trying to figure out how to deal with it, you know, But it was like | 00:51:13 | |
| we had to stop our conversation for the vehicle that was 100 feet away. And we all were just like, no, that we got to figure this | 00:51:18 | |
| out, you know, so. | 00:51:24 | |
| OK. Well, I think with that general direction that's very helpful to us and especially I think that that that. | 00:51:32 | |
| You know, this is a good start, but the consensus that and if need be, you know with the rest of the budget and how that looks | 00:51:41 | |
| that we will make sure to prioritize the public safety aspect of it so we can take that direction. I don't think we need a motion | 00:51:47 | |
| at this point. I think it's just general direction. | 00:51:54 | |
| And if everybody's ready, we can move to item 3. | 00:52:01 | |
| And item 3 we will need a motion for, but this is just part of again, trying to be proactive, trying to plan, trying to make sure | 00:52:07 | |
| that that we're planning for the year. So we brought our. | 00:52:13 | |
| Proposed quarterly meeting times and dates and we essentially. | 00:52:22 | |
| Tried to schedule it the last Wednesday at 5:00 PM except for in December because the last Wednesday's ends up being Christmas or | 00:52:29 | |
| Christmas Eve and so in December it'd be December 17th. | 00:52:36 | |
| That one we specifically wanted to call out because I know some people travel, you know, around that period. So if any of these, | 00:52:44 | |
| but particularly December, if we needed to move it up even a week, that could be something we can do relatively easily. But as of | 00:52:50 | |
| now, we have proposed these meeting dates for for next year and that March meeting date would be the one where we'd really dig | 00:52:56 | |
| into the budget, so. | 00:53:02 | |
| So if there is a motion to approve this schedule. | 00:53:09 | |
| Or a motion to change anything and then approve the schedule that can be done at this time. | 00:53:13 | |
| Would anybody like to change? | 00:53:19 | |
| Motion to approve. | 00:53:25 | |
| 2nd the motion. | 00:53:27 | |
| All in favor. All in favor, aye. | 00:53:29 | |
| And all opposed. | 00:53:32 | |
| All right, hearing none. The calendar is approved and we will meet again on March 26th. I do have one question. We've had a change | 00:53:34 | |
| in the council members, Bobby Martinez's left and Louise, Jess Lopez, Jeff Lopez is in. So we're all appointed by somebody. So I | 00:53:42 | |
| assume that doesn't affect anybody except whoever Bobby. | 00:53:50 | |
| I'm nominated by Bobby. | 00:54:03 | |
| Believe it was member Villanueva. | 00:54:06 | |
| I believe. | 00:54:10 | |
| And but. | 00:54:12 | |
| Nothing's changed yet. The new council member will be sworn in next Monday. | 00:54:14 | |
| And then the item for them to either confirm or change any appointments will come to the council. I think we're planning January | 00:54:20 | |
| 6th at this point. So nothing, it's possible that you know, nothing changes, but we'll know for sure January 6th. He has the | 00:54:26 | |
| option of picking somebody else. He has the opportunity to say, you know, oh, I know I have the perfect person that I want to put | 00:54:32 | |
| on this board. That's. | 00:54:38 | |
| Keeping you here if you want to do that, because you show up and you do your duty so. | 00:54:45 | |
| So that would be January 6, Yeah. And we'll make sure the way it works is that and it's not just this board, but basically all our | 00:54:51 | |
| boards. | 00:54:55 | |
| Will bring a list of them with all the appointments to the council. We'll say we have a new council member and then they get to | 00:55:02 | |
| propose any changes. Then after that meeting we'll like get in contact with anybody who is reappointed or not reappointed. So, so, | 00:55:09 | |
| so that would be January 6th and then we don't have another meeting till March 26th. | 00:55:15 | |
| So I'm guessing by March 26 we'll have known for quite a while. | 00:55:22 | |
| So, so I'll keep everybody in the loop though after January 6th, we'll let everybody know if there's been any change or anything | 00:55:31 | |
| like that. | 00:55:35 | |
| OK, can I have a motion to close the meeting? | 00:55:41 | |
| I make the motion to close the meeting. | 00:55:48 | |
| 2nd. | 00:55:50 | |
| All in favor. | 00:55:52 | |
| Get to use this. | 00:55:55 | |
| Thank you all for coming. Thank you. | 00:55:58 |