City Council Meeting
Bookmark list
* use Ctrl+F (Cmd+F on Mac) to search in document
Loading...
* use Ctrl+F (Cmd+F on Mac) to search in document
Loading...
* use Ctrl+F (Cmd+F on Mac) to search in document
Loading...
Transcript
| A really great, amazing journey to to get to where we are at this point. So I just want to say that I'm inspired by our | 00:00:00 | |
| management, our staff, everyone but but I just want to thank our city manager. | 00:00:06 | |
| James Vega, thank you. | 00:00:12 | |
| Thank you. | 00:00:14 | |
| Well, my evaluations like in two meetings. So just keep that in mind. No, thank you. | 00:00:17 | |
| Next, we will have public comments. We will hear public comments not pertaining to items on the agenda. Zoom participants, please | 00:00:24 | |
| use the Raise Your Hand feature if you would like to make a comment. Comments are limited to three minutes. This process will be | 00:00:29 | |
| the same for comments pertaining to each agenda item. Madam Clerk, do we have any public comments? | 00:00:35 | |
| We do. First one is Jamie Beavers. | 00:00:41 | |
| Good evening, My name is Jamie Beavers. I'm a resident of Port Hueneme. I really want to thank everyone for the amazing work. I | 00:00:49 | |
| see that busy agenda you have and how much has to be done to manage a city and I'm appreciative of it. | 00:00:58 | |
| I'm a dog owner that has a 75 LB dog that I never take on the beach because I know that goes against our laws. | 00:01:08 | |
| This morning I watched an owner of a dog, much more than £75 if that's very possible, release his dog at. | 00:01:18 | |
| The Alaska Memorial and the dog ran at top speed, easily 660 yards away from the owner. | 00:01:28 | |
| Completely out of control, no leash. | 00:01:37 | |
| And. | 00:01:41 | |
| Once the dog turned around and returned to the owner, on its way back, it stopped to urinate on the blue trash cans on the beach. | 00:01:43 | |
| Then returned to the owner and that went on for about an hour of the dog being free on the beach. | 00:01:52 | |
| This can be seen all day. | 00:02:01 | |
| Every day on our beach, at different times, probably at its greatest. | 00:02:04 | |
| At the weekend but its present constantly. I had the good fortune of speaking once to Steve Gamma about it as we walked on the | 00:02:09 | |
| beach on his clean up Saturdays and he suggested possibly a park Ranger would be a good idea. I've heard someone else suggest that | 00:02:17 | |
| perhaps we could utilize our Police Explorers program on the beach to perhaps a few weekends, especially during the summer stand | 00:02:25 | |
| at the entrances. | 00:02:32 | |
| And pass out pamphlets reminding our citizens that dogs are not permitted on the sand. It would be a benefit for our police | 00:02:41 | |
| explorers to see the reaction of our community to the laws that exist for us. Perhaps even pamphlets that have been passed out | 00:02:48 | |
| showing the location of beaches and dog parks that are closed. We're so fortunate that we already have a beach that we don't have | 00:02:56 | |
| to fight for the law to keep dogs off of our beach. It's in place already. | 00:03:04 | |
| And it would just be a matter of enforcing that law and emphasizing the safety of not having dogs on our beach and even the safety | 00:03:12 | |
| of our protected snowy plover. I have two questions for our City Council. Why do dog owners who respect the law have to endure the | 00:03:20 | |
| constant barrage of dogs on our beach? And why do beach walkers, runners, families and children have to be confronted by dogs on | 00:03:28 | |
| our beach when we have laws in place? | 00:03:35 | |
| And I thank you very much for your time. | 00:03:44 | |
| Mayor, if I could, the items not on the agenda so the council is not able to talk about it, but I just wanted to quickly mention | 00:03:49 | |
| that. | 00:03:52 | |
| Our police chief has been meeting with the Audubon Society and actually has brochures that they prepared and provided to our | 00:03:57 | |
| police officers now about keeping dogs off the beach and particularly how it impacts the snowy plovers. So we're going to our | 00:04:04 | |
| police department's been working with the Audubon Society to get those brochures to all our officers to get out to people. | 00:04:10 | |
| And then just on a quick note, I know last year during the summer, we did a couple things like some signage and things like that. | 00:04:17 | |
| And so we'll meet with our team as we are realizing we're getting back into summer and we'll look at what we can do this year. | 00:04:24 | |
| Thank you, Tim Fargo. | 00:04:31 | |
| All right, Good evening, Mayor Perez, Mayor Pro Tem McQueen Lejeune council members, city staff, members of the public. My name is | 00:04:40 | |
| Tim Fergal. I'm the city librarian here in Port Hueneme. I just wanted to provide you all with a quick update of what's been going | 00:04:46 | |
| on at the library or what hasn't been going on in the library during the closure. At this time, we don't have any substantial news | 00:04:52 | |
| for the public about when the reopening date will be. The county's doing everything it can to make sure the work is moving as fast | 00:04:57 | |
| as possible. | 00:05:03 | |
| During the closure, the mobile library is still visiting Miranda Park Monday afternoons from 1:00 to 4:00 PM. If you stop by, | 00:05:09 | |
| you'll have a chance. | 00:05:14 | |
| The Reagan Library, their new exhibit for the summer, is related to Star Wars, so we have discounted bookmarks over there for | 00:05:21 | |
| reduced admission. And if you drop your name into a raffle, there's a chance you can win free tickets. Additionally, our Summer | 00:05:28 | |
| Reading Kickoff program is going to be next Tuesday. | 00:05:34 | |
| June 11th from 11:00 AM to 12:00 PM. And that will be with Saving Wildlife International. So we'll have some live animals for the | 00:05:41 | |
| kids to see and interact with. And that will be taking place over at the Community Center in one of the classrooms. And just | 00:05:46 | |
| wanted to thank the city again for being such great partners to the library during the closure. So those are all the updates I | 00:05:52 | |
| have at this time. | 00:05:58 | |
| That would be next Tuesday, June 11th. We are still offering our story time program and that is Tuesday mornings from 10:30 to | 00:06:05 | |
| 11:00 AM. So this program will take place immediately following the story time. Thank you, thank you. | 00:06:13 | |
| Camilo Garcia. | 00:06:22 | |
| Hello Port Hueneme City Council, My name is Camilla Garcia and I'm a resident of Port Hueneme. I wanted to express my gratitude to | 00:06:33 | |
| the City Council of the city where I've where I have resided my whole life. I hope to one day be able to have a positive impact on | 00:06:38 | |
| my community like you 5 have. | 00:06:44 | |
| Beginning this fall, I will be attending UCLA as a political science major and will complete my undergraduate education in two | 00:06:50 | |
| years thanks to the Oxford Middle College High School program. | 00:06:54 | |
| Mr. Gama, thank you for being a big supporter of me for throughout my high school career. From providing me with community | 00:06:59 | |
| opportunities to allowing me to interview you for my surfing culture paper and to most recently writing a letter of recommendation | 00:07:06 | |
| for my college applications and scholarships, you have had one of the largest impacts in my life. | 00:07:12 | |
| Tonight, I come to express my concern about an upcoming agenda item for the County Board of Supervisors. | 00:07:19 | |
| Which helps disabled, elderly and a range of other people to participate in elections. | 00:07:56 | |
| For requiring a 100% count of electronic votes, which would be wildly expensive and study after study demonstrates that hand | 00:08:01 | |
| counts are not accurate compared to electronic votes. | 00:08:06 | |
| 5 Eliminating the scanning and counting of ballots in any form before Election Day. | 00:08:12 | |
| The Third Point troubled me the most because I will be attending UCLA next year, but I'm registered in Waimea come November. If | 00:08:18 | |
| this ordinance passes, I would have to travel an hour to vote in person. I have it a little bit easier because then my friends who | 00:08:24 | |
| also reside in Port Hueneme because they will be going to Berkeley, Davis and a variety of other schools to attend their higher | 00:08:29 | |
| education. | 00:08:34 | |
| As much as they would want to, they would be unable to vote and what should be their first election since they will be turning 18 | 00:08:40 | |
| this year. | 00:08:43 | |
| Another concern of mine is my grandparents. They have lived in Waimea with my parents for their whole lives, as long as they've | 00:08:47 | |
| lived in the United States, and have voted in every single election since the year 2000 when they first became citizens. Requiring | 00:08:52 | |
| them to go to a polling place would mean counting their votes out because they simply cannot go out and wait in long lines. Their | 00:08:57 | |
| health prevents this. | 00:09:02 | |
| I know this council cares about its residents and that it that's why I love this city so much. I'm asking you tonight to help me | 00:09:08 | |
| shut down this proposed ordinance on June 18th. A few friends and I will be speaking at the Board of Super Supervisors. We would | 00:09:15 | |
| love to have you and your support and I urge you to contribute in any way you can from speaking to the board meeting to raise | 00:09:21 | |
| awareness in our city. I would really appreciate it. Thank you for your time tonight. Thank you. | 00:09:27 | |
| We have one more public comment which was written. | 00:09:36 | |
| I am hopeful that staff and HCD will be able to resolve their differences without costly litigation. | 00:10:14 | |
| Adus have downsides, which include parking and unfunded demands on infrastructure. If the council determines that they want to | 00:10:21 | |
| limit Adu construction, then low income deed restrictions are a good idea. The HUD fair market rates are too low to support new | 00:10:28 | |
| construction, ensuring that that no one will build them. The city will need to come up with other ways to meet the state mandates | 00:10:36 | |
| for more housing. The primary reason homeowners build Adus is to gain an income source, the HED Fair Market. | 00:10:43 | |
| Friends for the 93041 zip code are too low to allow this given the cost of creating an Adu under this ordinance. Anyone doing so | 00:10:51 | |
| will have a negative flow for decades. | 00:10:56 | |
| What are the actual costs and rate of return? The numbers listed below assumed construction costs at. | 00:11:02 | |
| 400 per square foot, which is on the low side and the current interest rate of 7.7%. Anything larger or more expensive than the | 00:11:08 | |
| Adus listed below will result in a negative cash flow. The size of these units would need to shrink to save enough money to remedy | 00:11:15 | |
| code violations in the existing house and fund a mandated solar system. | 00:11:22 | |
| I don't know how to estimate the cost of resolving code violations on the existing home, installing solar, or loan costs for the | 00:11:29 | |
| Adu before it starts bringing in rent I left them. | 00:11:34 | |
| Of the equation without these costs, a 318 square foot studio Adu would cost 127,000. | 00:11:40 | |
| To build and yield a monthly profit of $3.00, a four 103rd 30 square foot one bedroom will cost 191,000 and net $5.00 a month. | 00:11:47 | |
| That's a return on investment of .0003 per year. A savings account paying one percent is 33 times higher than this return on | 00:11:55 | |
| investment. Would anyone on the council who owns a home agreed to go into debt, share their property with strangers, subsidized | 00:12:03 | |
| the tenants rent and commit to this for the next 110 years? Probably not. | 00:12:10 | |
| That's what this ordinance demands. If the council wants to limit 80 using WAIMEA, it should adopt this ordinance. If it wants | 00:12:18 | |
| more housing, it should vote to allow market rate ad use. If this council or future council decides to allow market rate Adus, | 00:12:25 | |
| what happens to people who accepted low income deed restrictions? The market rate Adus will be profitable and the deed | 00:12:32 | |
| restrictions Adus will have a negative cash flow for decades. David Scribner. That concludes public comment. | 00:12:39 | |
| Mayor, could I quickly on the second to the last speaker, I think it was Camille, right. So first, congratulations on UCLA and, | 00:12:47 | |
| and all that. That's amazing. I'm jealous. | 00:12:53 | |
| But also you mentioned you and your friends and if you're all Wanami residents, at the end of the meeting today, we're going to | 00:13:01 | |
| announce that the scholarship, the port scholarship for Wanami High School seniors that's being extended two weeks. So if you and | 00:13:06 | |
| your friends are qualified, we'd encourage you to check that out and apply. So we'll we'll share that information on the screen at | 00:13:11 | |
| the end of the meeting so. | 00:13:16 | |
| Nothing further. | 00:13:25 | |
| Thank you. | 00:13:26 | |
| We'll now move to the agenda approval for City Council. May I have a motion and a second to approve the agenda? | 00:13:29 | |
| Motion to Approve 2nd 2nd. | 00:13:35 | |
| All in favor, aye? | 00:13:41 | |
| Oh, I'm sorry, teleconference, I have to do roll call votes. | 00:13:43 | |
| Councilmember Gama. | 00:13:49 | |
| Yes. Council Member Hernandez. Yes. Yes. Mayor Pro Tem McQueen. Legend. Yes. And Mayor Perez. Yes. Motion passes. Thank you. | 00:13:52 | |
| Do any members have a conflict of interest to disclose for any item on the agenda? | 00:14:02 | |
| Not seeing any? We'll move on to the presentation. The presentation we have tonight is the Pride Month Proclamation. | 00:14:08 | |
| And it'll be read by Councilmember Gama. | 00:14:16 | |
| Thank you. | 00:14:19 | |
| Thank you Pride month June 2024 whereas an uprising at the Stonewall Inn in June 1969 sparked a liberation movement and | 00:14:21 | |
| trailblazed a fight against discrimination and justice, sparking a pursuit for full equity for the LGBTQ plus individuals. And | 00:14:29 | |
| whereas inspired to live up to our nation's promise of equality, liberty, and justice for all, Pride Month is a continued call to | 00:14:37 | |
| action to not only recall the trials that the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and. | 00:14:46 | |
| Queer have endured, but to rejoice in the triumphs and recognize a valuable contributions of these courageous individuals. And | 00:14:55 | |
| whereas Pride Month is a reminder to reaffirm our commitment to standing in solidarity with the LGBTQ plus community and their | 00:15:01 | |
| ongoing struggles against discrimination and injustice, and demand their rights to marriage equality, workplace protection, and | 00:15:07 | |
| civil rights. | 00:15:13 | |
| And whereas, it is our obligation to decry hate crimes motivated by sexual orientation or gender identity, bullying and | 00:15:19 | |
| harassment, and reduce violence and discrimination by providing protection for the LGBTQ plus individuals fundamental rights. And | 00:15:27 | |
| WHEREAS while historic progress has been made to deliver to deliver equality for LGBTQ plus individuals and families in | 00:15:35 | |
| employment, healthcare, housing, lending, military service and education. | 00:15:42 | |
| We recognize there is still much work to do. | 00:15:50 | |
| To be done and are fully committed to support and defending the rights of all LGBTQ plus individuals and whereas we recognize the | 00:15:54 | |
| resilience and determination of the many individuals who are fighting to live freely and authentically in doing to. | 00:16:01 | |
| Doing so, they are opening hearts and minds and laying the foundation for a more just and equitable America. Now therefore be it | 00:16:08 | |
| proclaimed that the City Council of Port Hueneme does hereby recognize and honor June 2024 as Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender | 00:16:15 | |
| and Queer plus Pride Month and call upon the community to celebrate the great diversity of the American people. Proclaim this | 00:16:22 | |
| third day of June 2024. Thank you Councilmember Goma. | 00:16:29 | |
| So this proclamation would be presented to the Ventura County Diversity Collective Board President Roland Catabona. | 00:16:37 | |
| Council Member Hernandez still needs to sign the proclamation. So we're going to get her signature and have it mailed out. | 00:16:47 | |
| Perfect. | 00:16:50 | |
| Thank you for coming. Thank you. | 00:16:56 | |
| Thank you, Mayor Perez. Thank you, Mayor Pro Tem, council members and city staff. | 00:16:59 | |
| I'm Roland Catabona, board president for Diversity Collective. On behalf of Diversity Collective, Ventura County is my pleasure to | 00:17:05 | |
| accept this year's 2024 Pride Proclamation. | 00:17:10 | |
| At DVC, our mission is providing advocacy, visibility, safety, and Wellness for the LGBTQ plus community. We envision of Ventura | 00:17:16 | |
| County, where LGBTQ plus individuals, inclusive of all intersecting identities, have immediate access. | 00:17:24 | |
| To needed services are celebrated and treated with equity and respect. | 00:17:32 | |
| We do this work via our Community Resource Center programs, support groups, and community based events. | 00:17:37 | |
| This proclamation is important to the community at large and especially to my family because the city of Port Venezuela. | 00:17:45 | |
| My partner and I reside and call home and decided to start our family. | 00:17:54 | |
| I'm the youngest of three, and my parents immigrated from the Philippines. My father retired after serving 33 years in the US | 00:17:58 | |
| Navy, and my mom retired as a phlebotomist at Quest in St. John's. | 00:18:04 | |
| I'm fortunate to have their support and have a performing family, but most individuals that utilize our Resource Center or who we | 00:18:10 | |
| meet and not in the community do not have that kind of support or acceptance. | 00:18:17 | |
| So my partner and I, we fostered two children during the COVID and we were blessed to be able to adopt. | 00:18:25 | |
| Are then sudden, two years ago. | 00:18:31 | |
| We want him to continue to grow up in a city where we, where he and our family are safe, are celebrated, treated and with equity | 00:18:34 | |
| and respect just like any family here. | 00:18:40 | |
| This proclamation sets that tone for this to happen, not only for my family, but for all the LGBTQ plus families. | 00:18:47 | |
| And our allies in Port Miami. | 00:18:55 | |
| This proclamation acknowledges that the City of Port My Name is dedicated to standing strong and marching forward in pride. | 00:18:58 | |
| We stand on the shoulders of generations for of LGBTQ activists past and present, and we move forward to creating the world as we | 00:19:07 | |
| want to see. | 00:19:12 | |
| I invite you to celebrate the community at the following upcoming events. There's a bunch of flag raisings and proclamations at | 00:19:18 | |
| the beginning of this month. At the end of the month, we have Santa Clara Pride I. | 00:19:23 | |
| Brunch on June 3rd, Pride Career Center on June 25th. Oxnard Pride. | 00:19:29 | |
| On June 29th and oh high Pride on June 29th and of course, Ventura County Pride is always a third weekend of August. This this | 00:19:35 | |
| year is August 17th. So I look forward to seeing everyone there and thank you once again and happy pregnant. Thank you for the | 00:19:42 | |
| work you do in the community for those individuals. And we'll get this to you as soon as possible. | 00:19:48 | |
| Thank you so much. We do a photo OPS. Oh yes, can we do a photo op? | 00:19:55 | |
| Just put your thumb on that. | 00:20:00 | |
| Signature. | 00:20:02 | |
| Oh, we're going to stand here. | 00:20:03 | |
| Yes. | 00:20:09 | |
| Thank you. | 00:20:21 | |
| All right, we move on to the consent calendar. | 00:20:42 | |
| We'll consider items on the Consent Calendar, which will be enacted in one motion unless a council member has a request to remove | 00:20:46 | |
| an item for discussion. Does any council member have a request to remove an item? | 00:20:51 | |
| My my intention is to vote no on five. So do I have to pull it? Have a? | 00:20:58 | |
| Discussion to vote individually on it or. | 00:21:03 | |
| Yes, I'd suggest pulling it. OK can we pull #5 please? | 00:21:06 | |
| OK, any other requests? | 00:21:11 | |
| We can pull vote for everything but five. Can I have a motion to approve one through 11 -, 5? | 00:21:15 | |
| So moved. | 00:21:26 | |
| 2nd. | 00:21:27 | |
| 2nd. | 00:21:29 | |
| Councilmember Gama. | 00:21:32 | |
| Yes, Councilmember Hernandez. Yes. Council Member Martinez Yes. Mayor Pro Tem McQueen Lashawn Yes. And Mayor Perez. Yes. Motion | 00:21:33 | |
| passes unanimously. | 00:21:38 | |
| And would you like to discuss your issue with the item number 5? | 00:21:44 | |
| Thank you, Mayor. | 00:21:50 | |
| After listening to the public comment and doing a little bit of research on my own. | 00:21:53 | |
| Kind of agree that. | 00:21:58 | |
| What's the purpose? Are we trying to gain housing or we making it? | 00:22:00 | |
| That the formula the numbers won't work and I think. | 00:22:06 | |
| Just Scrivener makes a compelling case that. | 00:22:11 | |
| By limiting. | 00:22:15 | |
| To low income we may in fact be. | 00:22:16 | |
| Hampering the ability financially for people to develop A to use and so. | 00:22:20 | |
| That's why I pulled it, because I'm going to. | 00:22:28 | |
| Vote no on five. | 00:22:32 | |
| We allowed to have staff comment on this item. | 00:22:34 | |
| Yes. Do we need to do anything to do before we do that? Now at this point, there's not a motion on the table, right, right. | 00:22:37 | |
| Director Stewart, Yeah, we can speak to it and I'll, I'll let Tony speak more to maybe some of the detail. But I think we talked a | 00:22:44 | |
| little bit about this last meeting and there is there's a lot of validity to the comments that that were provided by the resident. | 00:22:50 | |
| But it does sort of come down to a basic policy choice of if and and you know different cities have different goals with these, | 00:22:56 | |
| but is the goal to allow. | 00:23:02 | |
| Adus as required by the state. | 00:23:09 | |
| As long as they are affordable or is the goal to encourage Adus and to encourage them to be developed in the city? And those are | 00:23:12 | |
| two different goals. And right now the ordinance that we've prepared and everything that we've gone through is to try to keep as | 00:23:19 | |
| much local control over it with the focus being getting affordable housing out of it. | 00:23:25 | |
| And we could pivot to the other goal and as Mr. Scrivener said in the comment where he said that the state might, might force us | 00:23:33 | |
| to get to that goal. And that's very possible. At this point. The most recent meeting we had with the state, they indicated that | 00:23:39 | |
| we might not have to go to that point. But like we said last meeting, this might be a case where we keep adopting ordinances and | 00:23:45 | |
| giving in a little at a time. We may end up having to get to go as far as the state. | 00:23:52 | |
| Requires us to go so. So that is a basic question, a basic policy issue, but I'll let a community development director, Stewart | 00:23:59 | |
| maybe speak to some of the more specifics on it. | 00:24:05 | |
| Well, actually you stated it very clearly and very well. I don't have a whole lot more to add other than what we've, you know, | 00:24:11 | |
| discussed our last meeting as well. It really is, you know, this is a moving target. Adu laws change every year and I wouldn't be | 00:24:19 | |
| surprised that if we weren't coming back here sometime next year just because of new state mandates in addition to what we already | 00:24:27 | |
| have to deal with. So there's always the opportunity to change the ordinance at that point and or we may be told to. | 00:24:35 | |
| Again, you know, past councils and whatnot, we've opted to go forward with the affordable. | 00:24:44 | |
| Basically requiring the ad use to be affordable to help our arena numbers there. But again, that's that really is a policy | 00:24:52 | |
| decision for the council. You're not required to do so. And if, as Mr. Vega said, if if the goal really is just to get more | 00:24:58 | |
| rooftops constructed, so to speak. | 00:25:05 | |
| Then. | 00:25:13 | |
| You know, it really is up to you whether or not you want to make them affordable or not. We have not found. | 00:25:14 | |
| That folks are bulking and then pulling back applications, they're not submitting them. We still have a lot of Adu traffic at our | 00:25:20 | |
| counter, a lot of permits in process right now and many more on the way. So when we do our annual review next year, you'll most | 00:25:28 | |
| likely see quite a few additional Adus factory stock, quite a few additional ones this year's. So we're not finding the | 00:25:35 | |
| affordability complex issue to be a problem with the public in general. | 00:25:43 | |
| Here in the city, I also did want to clarify that the affordable agreements are a term of 55 years and not 110 years, so that was | 00:25:51 | |
| something I did want to clarify in the letter that was read earlier. | 00:25:57 | |
| The staff Does council have any further questions for staff? | 00:26:05 | |
| Mr. Stewart, I. | 00:26:08 | |
| Is it? | 00:26:10 | |
| If it's not financially feasible to break even, would that not limit the amount of 80 youth being constructed and we haven't had | 00:26:12 | |
| this affordability clause? | 00:26:19 | |
| Right, because we're just enacting the ordinance now. | 00:26:25 | |
| So I'm just, I'm just wondering, I'm just purely on economics like hey, if I have a nice big lot and I could squeeze a 600 square | 00:26:28 | |
| foot Adu in there, but it's going to cost X amount of dollars, is it? | 00:26:36 | |
| Finance are the applications. | 00:26:43 | |
| They don't have to demonstrate financial feasibility, but with the cap on the rent that could be charged, do we think that it | 00:26:47 | |
| could result in less units? | 00:26:53 | |
| Well, first of all, I want to clarify it that we've always required the affordability covenant. We have that in our current Adu | 00:26:59 | |
| requirement. This is a new standard. So what does that mean? Like what's the cap? Because I know the rents on my street are | 00:27:04 | |
| actually. | 00:27:09 | |
| And they're so high. I can't believe how much people. | 00:27:14 | |
| They're paying to rent a house, right? So again, it's based on what HUD, the government says are median income is for the for the | 00:27:17 | |
| county and it's also based on the household size and then what the income level is. So there's a, there's a formula there, but | 00:27:23 | |
| that's what our cap would be based on with regard to that. And that's again what it's always been with regard to our 80 | 00:27:29 | |
| ordinances. | 00:27:35 | |
| Yeah. And if I can just add there that you know this this is the challenges affordable in California doesn't mean what I think | 00:27:43 | |
| people think it means and and. | 00:27:48 | |
| And some people might pay that, you know, maybe maybe not $10,000, but maybe $5000, you know, so it just is there's, there's all | 00:29:03 | |
| these things to to look at and they do come down to policy decisions. On one hand, the state has taken the position that building | 00:29:09 | |
| more units will help drive prices down. We haven't really seen that yet. And so, so some cities, including ours at this point, | 00:29:15 | |
| we're taking the position of what we want to make sure, we want to make sure by requiring them to be affordable and not just leave | 00:29:21 | |
| it to the free market. So. | 00:29:27 | |
| Those are the two options that we have. The ordinances introduced has the deed restriction. The second reading has it. It doesn't | 00:29:33 | |
| have to be adopted, but then we would have to come back with an ordinance without the deed restriction if if not so. | 00:29:40 | |
| Council Member Hernandez, do you have any comments or questions? | 00:29:48 | |
| For staff. | 00:29:52 | |
| No, I don't. Thank you, Mayor. | 00:29:53 | |
| In shall we proceed with the vote then? | 00:29:55 | |
| Do I have a motion to vote on to approve item 5? | 00:30:01 | |
| Move to approve. I have a second. | 00:30:05 | |
| 2nd. | 00:30:08 | |
| Councilmember Gama. | 00:30:10 | |
| No. | 00:30:13 | |
| Councilmember Hernandez. | 00:30:15 | |
| Yes, Council Member Martinez, Mayor Pro Tem McQueen Lashawn and Mayor Perez. Yes. Motion passes four O 1 Council member Gamma | 00:30:17 | |
| voting no. | 00:30:21 | |
| Thank you. And we'll report back on what we hear back from the state at some point. It might not be our decision to make, but | 00:30:29 | |
| we'll bring it back. | 00:30:32 | |
| OK. We'll move on to public hearings, right? I didn't skip anything, right, OK. | 00:30:37 | |
| The first public hearing will be the Fiscal Year 2024-2025 Revised Budget. | 00:30:42 | |
| Madam Clerk, do you have proof of publication as required by law and a complete file of reports and exhibits? Yes, Madam Mayor, | 00:30:49 | |
| thank you. Will staff please present the report? | 00:30:53 | |
| Yes. And Lupe Serra, our Finance Director is going to present the report. I just wanted to before we get into the detail, just | 00:30:58 | |
| from a high level. | 00:31:02 | |
| Serious adjustments. And so I think the good news without keeping everybody in suspense is we, I think we've done a pretty good | 00:31:49 | |
| job at making those adjustments. | 00:31:53 | |
| To stay balanced when we had opportunities throughout the year, positions became open and things like that, we froze some, we | 00:31:58 | |
| looked, we kept some flexibility. So we're able to stay balanced without any serious reductions or any that would impact service | 00:32:04 | |
| level. And so we're proposing a balanced budget that that loop is going to walk us through. And I think the, the one thing I want | 00:32:10 | |
| everybody to kind of keep in the back of your mind is that we're seeing that these challenges may kind of continue over the next | 00:32:16 | |
| year. | 00:32:23 | |
| And, and I think other cities are starting to realize that the economy is changing and that you know that sales tax are softening | 00:32:29 | |
| around and interest rates are going up. So we're, we're ahead of the curve a little bit that we've started to adjust, but it's | 00:32:36 | |
| probably going to be tight for the next year to two years and then we'll go from there. | 00:32:42 | |
| But it's good news that we were able to get to this to balanced without major modifications. And we're hearing over the last month | 00:32:49 | |
| or so some, a lot of cities around us waited and they're having to make serious adjustments now. So we feel like we're maybe ahead | 00:32:57 | |
| of the curve, but it's still a lot of work to do. So with that, Lupe is going to give the detail on how exactly we did that. So. | 00:33:06 | |
| Thank you. Good evening Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem, City Council, city staff and members of the public. I am going to walk through the | 00:33:17 | |
| revised budget report for fiscal year 2425. Last year about this time we were in a budget workshop is actually June 5th of 2023 | 00:33:25 | |
| where we were at the council adopted the two year budget. | 00:33:33 | |
| And as the budget that was adopted citywide and that includes all of the related entities, which is housing authorities surplus | 00:33:43 | |
| authority. | 00:33:46 | |
| Was the revenues of $57.6 million and expenditures that 57.1 that's operating only, not including CIP moving on to general fund | 00:33:51 | |
| the adopted budget or revenues of 27.3 million and expenditures of 26.8. So you can see there was a surplus of $459,000. A city | 00:34:00 | |
| manager noted during 2024 we really started to see and experience several headwinds. | 00:34:10 | |
| That we knew we're going to impact next year's budget. One of them which we've talked about before is really the cannabis revenue | 00:34:20 | |
| reductions, most of it competitive impact. Some of it is consumer spending as well. There was more of an artificial inflationary | 00:34:27 | |
| period with cannabis. Businesses were doing really, really good during COVID and then it started to slow down. And then on top of | 00:34:34 | |
| that, we have competitive, competitive impact from neighboring cities. | 00:34:42 | |
| So that's really taken an impact on revenues from two different levels, which I'll show in a moment. | 00:34:49 | |
| Softening of consumer spending. Again, interest rates are going up. One of the areas is really like cars, disposable income is | 00:34:56 | |
| shrinking. So we started to see that really this year, the second, third quarter. And then the changes in the pool distribution, | 00:35:02 | |
| we talked a little bit about that. Those are the online sales that are purchased and we get the use tax, the city gets the use | 00:35:08 | |
| tax. It's an allocation that goes to the county. But now there's a fulfillment center in Oxnard and because that's the point of | 00:35:14 | |
| sale. | 00:35:20 | |
| The distribution has shifted and in essence, the city's getting a little bit less or a lot less. | 00:35:27 | |
| On pension costs going up, both the unfunded liability and just the ongoing normal cost. So that's a combination of both. And then | 00:35:34 | |
| overall just cost of doing business, I mean our cost of materials, our contract services are are going up and. | 00:35:41 | |
| And again, so we started to see this started to make some adjustments. We didn't fill some positions that were budgeted for | 00:35:52 | |
| vacancy. So we're going to talk a little bit about more about that. But we are very pleased to to present a balanced budget, | 00:36:01 | |
| general fund budget and the revenues are 27.1 million and operating expenditures again at 27.1. | 00:36:09 | |
| So here are the some of that. These are the highlights of what happened with revenue. The net decrease in revenue is roughly | 00:36:20 | |
| $200,000. But when we started looking at this and we started having conversations with HDL and looking at sales, we were really | 00:36:28 | |
| looking at a 2.1 deficit because we were looking at decreases in revenue from sales, total sales of 1.2. And then we knew that | 00:36:36 | |
| cannabis has been decreasing and that's the 5% that the city receives. That's down almost $1,000,000 or projected to be down. | 00:36:44 | |
| And so it was pretty concerning when we started this budget process, we started looking at other sources of revenue and luckily. | 00:36:52 | |
| Or fortunately, there isn't. There was an opportunity to increase property taxes $700,000. | 00:37:00 | |
| And that's because we, the city, satisfied the obligations for the redevelopment agencies. There used to be a tax deduction, if | 00:37:06 | |
| you will, that would go to the county to pay for those obligations. That is no longer the case. So we get all of the property | 00:37:14 | |
| taxes. So that's helping. And that was a significant amount that helped offset our investments. Council approved new investments | 00:37:21 | |
| with Chandler Management last October. We shifted $20 million from our Wells Fargo account where we weren't earning a whole lot. | 00:37:29 | |
| And we came in right at the right time because we're hovering about 5% earnings. And so that's helping out. | 00:37:37 | |
| And then state and local grants and other revenues such as revenues charges for services, we took a look at every single line | 00:37:44 | |
| item. Most of that, our majority of it is the Ventura County organized Task Force grant that we didn't have in the budget and that | 00:37:53 | |
| is $450,000 of that amount. So all of these different line items are helping offset those revenue losses. | 00:38:01 | |
| And we started taking a look at salaries and benefits. As city manager noted, there are or were a number of positions that were | 00:38:13 | |
| not filled. Some of them were part-time positions. | 00:38:18 | |
| And those are attributing to some salary savings, but net, net our salaries and benefits are still going up $134,000 for general | 00:38:25 | |
| fund and the big. | 00:38:31 | |
| A portion of it is the pension and other post employment benefits and that's $532,000. | 00:38:39 | |
| For a general fund only, we also increased or not increased, but just normalized the overtime we had, reduced it and then at mid | 00:38:47 | |
| year we came back to council and increased it again for PD. So we went ahead and normalized that a total of $150,000 and. | 00:38:56 | |
| There's a note here to mention that pension costs will continue to be a challenge. That's something that we're going to continue | 00:39:07 | |
| to look at and years to come. | 00:39:11 | |
| And these are the positions that we. | 00:39:19 | |
| Eliminated from the budget, we are not budgeting for four. And these are positions that impact both general fund and enterprise | 00:39:23 | |
| funds. So I just wanted to show the full FTE count. So it's a total of 8 positions. Public works, there's a reduction of four | 00:39:29 | |
| positions that are not budgeted for in the budget. | 00:39:36 | |
| We're not budgeting for the associate engineer and the principal engineer and there were two public work operations technicians | 00:39:44 | |
| that have been in the budget not filled. | 00:39:49 | |
| The police Support Services manager is 1 FTE position that we have it budgeted as a part-time position as an annual attempt. And | 00:39:56 | |
| so we didn't budget for that position in the budget. The building official has not been budgeted in the past. We continue the | 00:40:02 | |
| contract for that position. | 00:40:08 | |
| Parking enforcement with due to the realignment there, the community development manager is not being budgeted for in 2025. And | 00:40:16 | |
| then we have the two-part time positions. We had a code enforcement part time that we had not filled and we had an intern | 00:40:23 | |
| part-time in community development that. So that is the equivalent of eight positions. And then there were a number, we're | 00:40:31 | |
| proposing a number of reclassifications mostly in public works and that's really taking a look at staffing levels. | 00:40:38 | |
| Expertise tasks and doing what I like to say doing more with less. And so the landscape supervisor proposing to reclassify that | 00:40:45 | |
| position to landscape manager and then we have the solid waste coordinator and the wastewater maintenance lead. Both of those | 00:40:55 | |
| positions are enterprise fund positions. Those are proposed to reclassify to public works program managers. | 00:41:05 | |
| And the deputy public works director reclassified to a. | 00:41:16 | |
| Include civil and city engineer, so it would be the deputy public works director, a civil engineer combined and that's the reason | 00:41:23 | |
| the principal engineer position is would be unfilled and not not budgeted in the budget and then the mechanic too would be. | 00:41:32 | |
| Reclassified to senior mechanic, looking at the changes, the vacancies and also the increases for the general fund, the estimated | 00:41:41 | |
| savings is $450,000. | 00:41:49 | |
| City Manager. | 00:42:02 | |
| Of course, you might be able to answer it for me. I just want to say it out loud. We're talking about a lot of positions that | 00:42:04 | |
| we're either not going to fill or we're going to reclassify. I know some of them are vacant already, so there's been no incumbent | 00:42:10 | |
| in them, but I just want to ask the question out loud so the residents can hear. So are we not going to be getting some service | 00:42:17 | |
| because of the reclassification is realignments and the positions that are we not we're not going to be hiring is are the | 00:42:23 | |
| residents going to see any? | 00:42:29 | |
| Level change in support. | 00:42:35 | |
| Our intent was to not have any reduction in service level and I think we've accomplished that. | 00:42:37 | |
| Like Lupe said, sort of the motto was do more with less. And so we're eliminating some positions, but for the most part those had | 00:42:44 | |
| been vacant are are vacant. Currently there is one position where we have a person retiring and so that that's the the one | 00:42:52 | |
| position that has an incumbent as of right this moment, but. | 00:42:59 | |
| As you can see on this slide, most of those changes listed at the bottom, it's really what we did was like the public works | 00:43:07 | |
| department is a good example where in the past we had a assistant director who sort of oversaw a lot of supervisors. Now we're | 00:43:13 | |
| getting rid of that assistant director position and all the supervisors are going to be essentially like one step up. They're | 00:43:19 | |
| going to be managers with, with those additional supervisor managerial duties and evaluations and things like that, which the | 00:43:25 | |
| intent is to actually make. | 00:43:31 | |
| Take some of those tasks so that the director doesn't have to do all of those tasks for every employee. | 00:43:38 | |
| And that they're actually being managed by their by their their manager. | 00:43:43 | |
| But then at the same time trying to do it smartly in a way where we're saving money because we we don't have to have this $200,000 | 00:43:49 | |
| assistant director position that we had previously. So it's, you know, essentially it's, you know, where there's maybe was a layer | 00:43:56 | |
| that was that is good to have Right now we're entering the phase where if we don't need to have it and we can do it more | 00:44:04 | |
| efficiently, we're going to try to do that. And so, so my summary would be that these were reductions proposed with the idea. | 00:44:12 | |
| At this point of no impact to service level. | 00:44:20 | |
| Thank you. | 00:44:24 | |
| OK. So then in taking a look at just operating expenses, we had an area where we had to increase the budget for several reasons. | 00:44:30 | |
| And these are the major line items that we have to increase and the reasons for it. So software cost is a pretty significant one, | 00:44:38 | |
| $95,000 and that is related to the fact that we're transitioning systems and we have to continue the legacy system until we fully | 00:44:46 | |
| transition from Tyler 100%. And so we still need the support and we're doing it in phases. So we'll we need to. | 00:44:54 | |
| 20 fiscal year 2025, so after next year it will go away. So we'll have one system, one fee, one annual fee, police firearms, | 00:45:03 | |
| weapons that kind of put them all together $50,000. So it's several items that are $15,000 for firearms, the radio $34,000. We did | 00:45:13 | |
| increase police training for mandated training and you hires the touchless meters $25,000. We're planning to order them now. | 00:45:23 | |
| But it doesn't look like we'll receive them and install them before year end. And in order for us to be able to record him, it has | 00:45:34 | |
| to be installed. And so we're asking for that in 2025. And then just vehicle maintenance compliance costs, that's just the cost of | 00:45:40 | |
| our compliance going up, maintenance cost going up. And the same thing with the last one. There's a couple line items there, but I | 00:45:46 | |
| know like our banking fees are going up about $26,000. Utilities overall are going up. And so those are just hard costs, if you | 00:45:52 | |
| will that. | 00:45:59 | |
| Are expected to go up because we're seeing those increases. So again in taking a look at the operating increases, we looked at | 00:46:05 | |
| what areas that we could look at offsetting without impacting service levels and one of them is training. So we went and had | 00:46:13 | |
| meetings with all the departments. Our training is being reduced 50,000 that's from all various departments that are able to do | 00:46:21 | |
| the training online versus going in person. So that's saving really the travel. | 00:46:29 | |
| We're still continuing to do the planning to do the training, but it's going to be mostly done online. Contract services | 00:46:38 | |
| reduction, There's a lot going on in contract services. So I wanted to mention that because when you look at the report, there's a | 00:46:43 | |
| lot of insurance and outs with the new system. | 00:46:48 | |
| Staff added new line items to better identify cost. We used to have it all in one line, contract service, professional services. | 00:46:54 | |
| Now we have subscriptions legal so that's why it looks in and out. But the net is a savings of about 50,000. | 00:47:02 | |
| I'm so sorry, $90,000 in contract services from doing some of those. | 00:47:10 | |
| Outside services in house. | 00:47:16 | |
| General fund was going to pick up $50,000 for the purchase of a dump truck and we're going to be able to use the dump truck from | 00:47:21 | |
| that one. The enterprise fund is going to purchase and we're going to use their used dump trucks. So we're saving that $50,000 at | 00:47:26 | |
| least for the moment. | 00:47:31 | |
| And for the beach walkways? | 00:47:38 | |
| There we have restricted funds that we are going to deplete. So we're going to utilize that and shift that from general fund to | 00:47:42 | |
| use those restricted funds. So that's $75,000. | 00:47:46 | |
| And then just that $10,000 was really from a lot of departments that really gave 1000 dollars, $2000 in small equipment and | 00:47:51 | |
| deferred those purchases are going to use their existing equipment. So those adjustments help offset some of the increases I. | 00:48:00 | |
| And then in regards to what else is in our budget that we have not builded in the past and this is a revised budget. So when we do | 00:48:09 | |
| the two year we'll have a lot more opportunity to plan and we think talk about. | 00:48:16 | |
| These measure you and the port revenues, but we did. | 00:48:24 | |
| The last meeting with Measure, Measure You, they approved our budget and so this is the first time that we're able to include the | 00:48:28 | |
| Measure You budget components into our budget. There's some slight revisions to the dollars because when they approved it, it was | 00:48:36 | |
| based on the approved budget. Now we're making some revisions, reducing some cost, but all the categories remain the same. And so | 00:48:44 | |
| the budget for Measure U is one point almost 1.8 million in public safety and then another 1.8 in parks and rec. | 00:48:52 | |
| And then all the port revenues are revised estimate that we received from the port is that we'll get $2.8 million for the | 00:49:03 | |
| agreements and that revenue is also being used to provide police services. So our operating budget for police is about $12.4 | 00:49:09 | |
| million and so that. | 00:49:15 | |
| Equates to about 14% of operations. And and then we're the second bullet point here, we're doing the street maintenance that $1 | 00:49:22 | |
| million will be used for the waiting Me Rd. so $1 million from the port and then $1,000,000 from general fund. So just that will | 00:49:31 | |
| be something again when we do the two year budget we'll we'll highlight that and we'll have more involvement with that. | 00:49:39 | |
| And in this next slide, I wanted to talk about CIP. There were a lot of schedules that we provided for CIP because we took a look | 00:49:51 | |
| at doing revising this year since we're so close to the end of the fiscal year and then taking a look at the next year and then | 00:49:59 | |
| three years going forward for projects. And 20/23/24, which is this year, the citywide CIP is $10.8 million. That's what we're | 00:50:06 | |
| projecting to spend as a city. Of this amount, 1.7 is general fund and A. | 00:50:14 | |
| Of that 1.7 a million dollars is bubbling springs. So most of it is bubbling springs. The rest of the bubbling springs is going to | 00:50:22 | |
| shift over to next year. And so in 2425 citywide CIP is 29.9 million, which is a big number, but 6.6 is general fund. And then. | 00:50:33 | |
| 3.9 is is bubbling springs again and 2.7 is other projects and I'll go through those projects. And then also wanted to mention | 00:50:44 | |
| that 2.7 is being funded by that CIP reserve. | 00:50:51 | |
| That council established, so we have $3,000,000, we'll have $3,000,000 in that reserve. | 00:50:58 | |
| And in 2526 and throughout 2627 future years, the schedules provide the priority of projects. There are some projects on those | 00:51:08 | |
| schedules that we intend to fund from grants because their future projects city intends, city staff intends to apply for grants to | 00:51:14 | |
| fund those projects. | 00:51:20 | |
| And here's the list of the CIP projects for next year. So again, 3.9 million is Bubbling Springs I. | 00:51:30 | |
| $1 million is the Wanami Road and the rest are the underground storage tank which needs to be repaired. That's general fund | 00:51:40 | |
| because we own the property there. Police Department improvements. The remainder of the improvements will be completed next year. | 00:51:48 | |
| So they're really rolling over from this year. 450,000 Citywide parking lot repairs, almost $200,000. City facility tech | 00:51:55 | |
| improvements, 180,000 and that's part of it is the the remainder of the balance of the Tyler software. | 00:52:03 | |
| Is included in there another 180,000 for storm drains and then 24,000 for Waimani Beach Walkway. Like I said, the other walkways | 00:52:11 | |
| will be paid by restricted funds. So that's the $6.6 million. | 00:52:19 | |
| And with that, here is the revised budget that we are looking at for approvals. Citywide 56.9 million with expenditures of 56.6, | 00:52:29 | |
| general fund balance budget with revenues at 27.1 and expenditures. | 00:52:38 | |
| 27.1 million, so again, a balanced budget. | 00:52:48 | |
| On this next slide, I want to just show the reserves. So just a little bit of history 2023, that's the audit that we just | 00:52:54 | |
| completed. The auditor went over the different reserves for general fund and the unassigned fund balance. | 00:53:02 | |
| In 2024, based on the adopted budget for 2024, our reserves are they don't change much. So what we do at the end of the year is we | 00:53:11 | |
| make an adjustment to keep to maintain that reserve at those levels. | 00:53:18 | |
| Like the economic emergency is 6 months of operating expenses. So stability reserve is 10% and then risk management is 50%. And | 00:53:26 | |
| then the capital reserve, it was a million five that we shifted to the capital reserve in 2023. Intent we're intending to again | 00:53:34 | |
| shift another 1.5. So it'll be $3,000,000. But then we're using that you go back to 2425, most of it's going to be used for the | 00:53:41 | |
| for the CIP. | 00:53:49 | |
| And that's something we can have conversations and make adjustments at mid year if council decides we want to use an assigned | 00:53:57 | |
| instead of the CIP reserve and or if there is a surplus. So we have one time revenues that come in or less expenses or a little | 00:54:04 | |
| bit of salary savings, which usually happens when people leave and you don't feel that position, you're going to have some salary | 00:54:10 | |
| savings. So that's there's some opportunity to take a look at that. But at the end of 2025, we're looking at an assigned fund | 00:54:17 | |
| balance of $7.5 million. | 00:54:24 | |
| And then the enterprise funds, those operate like business enterprises. So basically there's a charge for service and those that's | 00:54:37 | |
| charges are intended to provide revenue to. | 00:54:43 | |
| For operating and capital expenditures. | 00:54:52 | |
| And in this chart shows the estimated the ending fund balance from. | 00:54:56 | |
| The beginning found balance this year and then the proposed net income for the enterprise fund, enterprise funds and then their | 00:55:04 | |
| CIP enterprise funds reserves for policy. And that's something that we can also take a look at is 3 months of operating expenses. | 00:55:11 | |
| And so that's what's built into that reservation and CIP number, the $9 million total. And then the ending fund balance again, | 00:55:18 | |
| it's, it's pretty strong for water operations. One of the areas that will be taking a look at with public works is the future | 00:55:25 | |
| infrastructure needs for. | 00:55:32 | |
| All of the enterprise funds due to aging, you know, repairs and long term needs. | 00:55:39 | |
| So we'll be looking at that, assessing the need for rate adjustments in the future. | 00:55:46 | |
| Director of Sarah, hold on one moment. Councilmember Hernandez, do you have a question pertaining to something right now or do you | 00:55:52 | |
| want to wait until she's done? | 00:55:55 | |
| You know, it was, I had a questions regarding the last couple of slides, but I can wait till she's done. Yeah, I'll just lower my | 00:55:59 | |
| hand. Thanks. | 00:56:03 | |
| Thank you. | 00:56:09 | |
| So the recommendation for tonight is the to receive the report with the fiscal year 2425 revised budget and provide direction | 00:56:15 | |
| regarding the revised report, approve the updated CIP project list for fiscal year 23 and fiscal year 2324 and fiscal year 2425. | 00:56:27 | |
| Included also is the salary schedule, which includes the cost of living adjustments. | 00:56:40 | |
| In the proposed reclassification so approved the the recommendation is to approve the revised salary schedule with these items | 00:56:45 | |
| adopt the resolution of City Council of the city of Poinami determining and establishing the appropriations limit for the fiscal | 00:56:53 | |
| year 2425 that's included in your report. And we are not limited because our sales tax dollars are less than are calculated again | 00:57:00 | |
| appropriation so that we. | 00:57:08 | |
| Exceed. | 00:57:16 | |
| And we are not restricted with in regards to. | 00:57:18 | |
| Revenues from Texas and the last one is adopt A resolution of the City Council of the City of Port Hueneme Minimi adopting the | 00:57:22 | |
| revised budget for fiscal year 2425. | 00:57:28 | |
| Looking ahead. | 00:57:36 | |
| City manager and I and, and and the directors, the entire team are going to be looking at long-term forecasting, which is | 00:57:39 | |
| something that at least since I've been here, we haven't done. We usually do the two year budget, we make the revisions and we do | 00:57:46 | |
| the mid year. But some of the changes that I discussed are not going away. So it's, it's sort of like the new norm and we really | 00:57:53 | |
| got to start taking a look at long term revenues and forecasting our the revenues and expenditures. | 00:58:00 | |
| Which is really going to lay the foundation for budgets in the coming years. And so that's the expectation that we'll be | 00:58:07 | |
| presenting to council a forecast in in the future, in the near future. | 00:58:15 | |
| With that, I'll take any questions and I apologize, I don't think I put a slide for questions, but thank you, Director Sarah, | 00:58:23 | |
| Council Member Hernandez. | 00:58:27 | |
| Thank you, Mayor Perez, and thank you, Miss Assero for your presentation and your hard work on this budget. Thank you, James, for | 00:58:32 | |
| your efforts and everything you've done to bring our budget and balance. Congratulations on a job well done. I very much | 00:58:39 | |
| appreciate it. I'm sure council does as well. I just have a couple of questions to help me better understand the staff report on | 00:58:45 | |
| page. | 00:58:52 | |
| Three of 98. | 00:58:59 | |
| There's a a table here and it mentions the revenue and expenditures of 27 million. Ninety 3918 exclude the risk and fleet revenue | 00:59:03 | |
| and expenditures which are separate a separate division which is now under the general fund. What does that mean? | 00:59:12 | |
| Absolutely. Great question. The what I was trying to do in on this chart here is normalized to what the adopted budget was. So it | 00:59:22 | |
| was apples to apples with the conversion to Tyler, we brought over fleet and risk were separate funds and now they are still | 00:59:31 | |
| separate divisions, but they're part of the general fund. We're still tracking them as separate divisions, but they under | 00:59:39 | |
| reporting that they're going to be included and that's the reason that when you look at the revenue. | 00:59:48 | |
| And the expenditures on the schedule A, it's 28,000,028.2. The difference is the fleet and risk. | 00:59:57 | |
| Those divisions are now in the in the general fund, but they're separate and they those get allocated out. And so that was one of | 01:00:09 | |
| the reasons that we decided to bring him over because at the end of the year or monthly, we allocate all the fleet costs to the | 01:00:16 | |
| different divisions. So it's an allocation. | 01:00:22 | |
| OK, OK, Thank you. I think I understand that. And then, you know, public safety is always a large portion of a municipal | 01:00:31 | |
| organization's budget. So I do have a couple of questions on police. | 01:00:38 | |
| Costs I noticed here there's an increase of 1150 thousand to restore police overtime to historical norm. What is the historical | 01:00:47 | |
| norm? | 01:00:52 | |
| Do we know that? | 01:00:58 | |
| Yes, we do. We have. I think for investigations it was either 6 or 700,000 and we had brought it down to 500,000 and memory serves | 01:01:00 | |
| me right and then we adjusted it back up at mid year. | 01:01:07 | |
| Back to 600,000 I believe. | 01:01:17 | |
| And I think that just comes down to. | 01:01:20 | |
| A lesson I learned maybe 10 years ago doing doing a budget of being realistic. | 01:01:24 | |
| When it was adopted at that time. | 01:02:04 | |
| It again reduced the amount, but we wanted to do the same thing and just keep it at that historical level, so. | 01:02:06 | |
| OK. Thank you. And then as far as police training for mandated training, how much of that is post reimbursable, How much of the | 01:02:15 | |
| mandated training is post reimbursable? | 01:02:20 | |
| Do we know that? | 01:02:26 | |
| I don't have the number off the top of my head, but I will provide the number because when that comes in and we've had | 01:02:29 | |
| conversations on that because it's revenue, it it really gets coded as miscellaneous revenue. So we still have to show the 100% of | 01:02:35 | |
| the expense. But that's a great question. I will provide that information and we do know some of it is post reimbursable because | 01:02:42 | |
| we have that conversation, but I don't know that we had an exact number yet. | 01:02:48 | |
| All right. And then the position descriptions at the. | 01:02:56 | |
| Which are attachment one to the board packet, the to this item? Are we approving those as well the position descriptions? | 01:03:02 | |
| Or are they are they final and ready for us to approve or is there something else that needs to be done to those? No. So the | 01:03:11 | |
| intent was to approve the the modifications today and then the job descriptions for those positions today. | 01:03:19 | |
| OK. And those have been through HR prepared them. OK. All right. I think that's it for my questions. Thank you very much. Again, | 01:03:27 | |
| congratulations and thank you for bringing to Council a balanced budget. Thank you. | 01:03:34 | |
| The other Council members have questions. Council No. Council Member Gamma. | 01:03:42 | |
| Mayor Pro Tem. | 01:03:47 | |
| All right, seeing no further questions, we will open the public hearing and take public comments. The public hearing is now open | 01:03:50 | |
| for public input at 7:35 PM. Are there any public comments regarding this item? No public comments. | 01:03:57 | |
| Thank you. Seeing none, we will close the public hearing. Public input has been concluded. I will now close the public hearing. | 01:04:06 | |
| The time being 7:35 PM. | 01:04:10 | |
| We have before us a recommendation to receive a report of the fiscal year 2425 Revised budget and provide direction regarding the | 01:04:16 | |
| fiscal year 2425 Revised Budget report. Approve the updated capital improvement plan projects for fiscal year 2324 and fiscal year | 01:04:23 | |
| 2425. Approve the revised salary schedule, which includes position reclassifications and the cost of living adjustments per the | 01:04:31 | |
| approved MO as adopt A resolution of the Council. | 01:04:38 | |
| Of the City of Port Hueneme, determining and establishing the city's appropriation limit. | 01:04:46 | |
| For the fiscal year 2425 and adopt A resolution of the Council of the City of Port Hueneme adopting the revised budget for fiscal | 01:04:50 | |
| year 2425. | 01:04:55 | |
| Do I have a motion and a second? | 01:04:59 | |
| I'll make a motion to approve all the recommendations. | 01:05:02 | |
| 2nd, 2nd Thank you. | 01:05:06 | |
| No further discussion before we go for a vote. | 01:05:10 | |
| Madam Clerk. | 01:05:13 | |
| Council Member Gama, Council member Hernandez, Council member Martinez, Mayor Pro Tem McQueen Legend and Mayor Perez. Yes, motion | 01:05:15 | |
| passes unanimously. Thank you. Congratulations staff. Great work. | 01:05:21 | |
| Thank you. | 01:05:29 | |
| We'll move on to business items. The first business item is the annual assessments for Assessment district #87. | 01:05:32 | |
| Dash 1. Assessment district #91-1 and Assessment District 95-3. | 01:05:39 | |
| Well, staff, please present the report. | 01:05:46 | |
| Good evening, Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem, council, members of the public and staff. What you have for you tonight is an annual item that | 01:05:49 | |
| you've seen for many years in the past. This is regarding our three assessment districts that we have, one being the Lighting | 01:05:55 | |
| Maintenance Assessment District, 1 being the Parkway and median Assessment district, and the other being the Drainage Assessment | 01:06:01 | |
| district. | 01:06:07 | |
| What we you're doing tonight is going ahead and approving a resolution making the notice of your intention to levy the | 01:06:15 | |
| assessments. | 01:06:21 | |
| And also set the public hearing, which will be at the next council meeting. | 01:06:27 | |
| And with that there are. | 01:06:33 | |
| The lighting assessment district is. | 01:06:37 | |
| Has an estimated revenue of $122,244.00 with some estimated expense of $165,000, which results in an estimated deficit of just | 01:06:41 | |
| over $42,000. We don't have any fund balance in this district. The Parkway and Median Assessment District has an estimated revenue | 01:06:49 | |
| of $178,424. | 01:06:58 | |
| With an estimated expense of $205,983.00 with. | 01:07:07 | |
| A deficit of. | 01:07:14 | |
| $27,559 But the Parkway Median Assessment District does have some fund balance in it. | 01:07:16 | |
| And so that deficit will be absorbed and leaving an estimated ending fund balance of $170,000 for $170,441. | 01:07:26 | |
| And the Drainage assessment district has an estimated revenue of $185,000 with estimated expense of $22,000 this year and next | 01:07:36 | |
| year. And. | 01:07:43 | |
| And it has an estimated accumulated fund balance of $437,526. | 01:07:50 | |
| Which would leave an estimated fund balance of $600,000. | 01:07:57 | |
| The drainage assessment district, we may end up coming back at some point. We were contemplating work. Most of that has been what | 01:08:03 | |
| has been going on with the Creek clearing project. We had originally anticipated maybe not doing some of that work just because of | 01:08:11 | |
| the timing and some of the things that were going on with the park project. However, after looking at some of the things that are | 01:08:18 | |
| going on out at the Creek. | 01:08:26 | |
| We may end up coming back and asking council in the future to go ahead and appropriate money for work to be done within the Creek | 01:08:33 | |
| which would be funded by the Drainage assessment district. | 01:08:39 | |
| And and as I mentioned before, that's that will have a large fund balance. So anything that we do won't be. | 01:08:46 | |
| Using that entire fund balance. | 01:08:52 | |
| And if you have any questions, I'll be happy to answer them. | 01:08:55 | |
| Thank you. Does this Council have any questions for staff? | 01:09:00 | |
| Just preemptively make one comment because it's probably, it's probably going to be the question, so I'll answer it, which is a. | 01:09:08 | |
| So two of the funds have. | 01:09:15 | |
| Expenses that exceed revenues and long term. | 01:09:19 | |
| We'll have to figure that out. So just in case that was going to be the question, we have started to talk about it the the | 01:09:24 | |
| challenge and the reason why we can't fix it now and why why we have to adopt it this way is that to make changes to our | 01:09:29 | |
| assessment districts requires us to go back to the voters to get approval to make changes to it. So it's one of those things where | 01:09:35 | |
| you if you when you start to see that problem. | 01:09:40 | |
| There's, you know, that there's going to be a process to go to the voters and, and try to address that problem. Or the alternative | 01:09:47 | |
| would be looking at the services closely and seeing, you know, if things, if there's certain services that aren't needed or | 01:09:53 | |
| desired anymore. So, so there are, like I said, for lighting and Parkway, we're getting to that point where that's something to | 01:09:59 | |
| start thinking about. But as of this point right now, our current budget includes sort of the little covering the little | 01:10:05 | |
| additional cost on on those two. | 01:10:11 | |
| Drainage district is in good shape, so we recommend adopting or moving forward with this at this time and then it's just something | 01:10:18 | |
| that we'll have to look at in this coming year, so. | 01:10:24 | |
| Why are these assessment districts so difficult to. | 01:10:30 | |
| Get anything done with them? Why does it require so much work? | 01:10:34 | |
| It's required every year that we go through this process that we hold, then hold a public hearing to, to to levy the assessments | 01:10:37 | |
| and then we're required to pretty much track and keep record of everything we do that we charge to the districts. And that's a | 01:10:43 | |
| whole process. There's other cities, some around us that have had problems where there's been millions of dollars kind of | 01:10:50 | |
| commingled between. | 01:10:56 | |
| Going where it shouldn't go and things like that. So there are a lot of work, but and then like I said and then to make | 01:11:03 | |
| adjustments to it, you have to go through a Prop 218 process. So it's just everything you do with them is a lot of work. But right | 01:11:09 | |
| now the drainage isn't in good shape. The other two at least are covering most of the cost, but that's something we're going to | 01:11:15 | |
| have to look at because cost keep going up so. | 01:11:21 | |
| OK. And and we. | 01:11:28 | |
| We can. | 01:11:30 | |
| Look at how we go about doing that. But we've had discussions in the past when this items come forward and the answer's been. | 01:11:32 | |
| To go ahead and do that, you might risk your original 1 And so we've had our previous city attorney mentioned that the way that he | 01:11:44 | |
| felt would be most proper to do that would create an overlay district for each of these where we have balances and then do that to | 01:11:50 | |
| try and. | 01:11:56 | |
| Gain additional revenue out of those. But he also pointed out that the big caveat with that is that. | 01:12:02 | |
| It's very expensive. I mean, there you have to do a thorough study. You have to be able to prove exactly what you're going to be | 01:12:10 | |
| spending that money on. And on a couple of these, yes, we run a deficit, but it's not large and the amount of effort and cost to | 01:12:15 | |
| do that. | 01:12:20 | |
| He, in his opinion, said, you know, I don't know that it's worth all of that exercise. And I. | 01:12:27 | |
| NASCAR. | 01:12:35 | |
| New city attorney if she has any differences in that. | 01:12:37 | |
| I happen to agree with Mr. Spaulding's analysis on this. It's it's not quite throwing good money after bad, but it can be very | 01:12:43 | |
| expensive and you're not getting a lot in return for that expense. | 01:12:50 | |
| Well, OK then. Thank you. | 01:12:59 | |
| Oh, go ahead. | 01:13:02 | |
| Yeah, this question just for me to understand when you have a deficit. | 01:13:04 | |
| Umm, let's say of the lighting maintenance, you have a deficit of 42,042.7. | 01:13:10 | |
| And the and the balance is 0. | 01:13:16 | |
| Where does the funds come from? | 01:13:21 | |
| It'll be the general fund that will pick up. | 01:13:24 | |
| So that gets built into that budget that we just approved. And that's one of those pressures. When we said cost of business going | 01:13:27 | |
| up, it's a lot of little things like this where it's just, you know, that used to be paid for and now it's gone up just enough | 01:13:34 | |
| where it's making an impact on the general fund. And just between those two items, we're talking about $70,000, you know, so, so | 01:13:40 | |
| yeah, so they do end up basically taking a subsidy from the general fund. | 01:13:47 | |
| But I think I also heard you say that that number is continuing to increase. | 01:13:55 | |
| I think that's the concern I have because costs just continue to increase. And so I think one thing we have to look at, and Mr. | 01:13:59 | |
| Cameron mentioned that, you know, it's one of those things where when. | 01:14:05 | |
| 10 thousand $20,000 off, it's probably not worth the cost because going through a property 218 process can easily be 50 to | 01:14:12 | |
| $100,000, maybe more in this day and age. And so but at some point you kind of that equation changes. So, so for us, I think it's | 01:14:21 | |
| something we'll look at and just sort of keep an eye on and and come back when we think it's the time to have that conversation. | 01:14:29 | |
| OK. Any further questions for staff? | 01:14:40 | |
| Seeing none. | 01:14:43 | |
| Are there any public comments on this item? | 01:14:47 | |
| No public comments, thank you. So the recommendation is to adopt A resolution of the City Council of the City of Port Hueneme, CA. | 01:14:49 | |
| Declaring its intention to order the levy. Levy and collection of assessments for the Lighting Maintenance Assessment district | 01:14:57 | |
| #87-1. | 01:15:01 | |
| For the fiscal year beginning July 1st, 2024 and ending June 30th, 2025. | 01:15:05 | |
| May I have a motion and a second? | 01:15:48 | |
| So moved. | 01:15:51 | |
| 2nd. | 01:15:54 | |
| No further discussion. Madam Clerk, we have a vote, please. Councilmember Gama. | 01:15:56 | |
| Yes, Council Member Hernandez. | 01:16:03 | |
| Yes, Councilmember Martinez. Yes, Mayor Pro Tem McQueen Legend Yes, Mayor Perez. | 01:16:05 | |
| Yes, motion passes unanimously. Thank you. | 01:16:11 | |
| The next item is the annual review of the City Council Policy and Procedures manual and resolution approving an amendment. | 01:16:15 | |
| Well, staff, please present the report. | 01:16:23 | |
| Yes, thank you. Thank you, Mayor. This one I'll keep. | 01:16:28 | |
| So this item is. | 01:16:35 | |
| What we're proposing to be the start of doing an annual review of our council policy and procedures manual, and we mentioned in | 01:16:37 | |
| our staff report that it's one of those things that has started to become a good practice for cities, is to do an annual review of | 01:16:44 | |
| the policy and procedures manual, if nothing else, so that the City Council sort of gets the refresher every year of the policy | 01:16:52 | |
| and procedures manual, which is essentially the handbook that the council agrees to hold themselves to. | 01:16:59 | |
| And and how they approach meetings and. | 01:17:08 | |
| And different items within the Council's purview. | 01:17:11 | |
| And so the handbook is that standard and and more and more cities are starting to have an annual review where the City Council | 01:17:15 | |
| revisits that revive, makes any revisions and then adopts it and reiterates that it's the standard that they will be holding | 01:17:22 | |
| themselves to in that year. I think particularly it's becoming a best practice to review it annually because there are just so | 01:17:29 | |
| many state laws and things that change and that impact some of the the. | 01:17:37 | |
| Policy and procedures. And so it's just good to review it as well to make sure it's in compliance with the law or with how how | 01:17:45 | |
| things are actually handled. And with that in mind, we have in the staff report a short bullet point list of some of the | 01:17:52 | |
| recommendations we make, which are sort of with that in mind, like as an example of a recommendation we made, we've noticed that | 01:18:00 | |
| the future agenda item process described in the handbook isn't actually. | 01:18:07 | |
| Exactly the future agenda item process that we we actually follow it. It had things in different orders. | 01:18:15 | |
| So we've recommended changes like that to actually make a match what we're actually doing and so. | 01:18:20 | |
| So we we recommended that change. We recommended updating the language about council members having to leave the room if they have | 01:18:28 | |
| a conflict of interest to match the process. And we've updated the. | 01:18:36 | |
| And again, just we just recommend starting to do this as a yearly update and a best practice to to follow. | 01:19:18 | |
| So that's what's included at this point in the agenda. We note in the item that there have been council meetings we've had | 01:19:26 | |
| recently where there have been specific questions about making changes or additions to the policy and procedure manual. So this | 01:19:33 | |
| agenda item also allows council members to identify those or discuss those if if desired. So we're happy to answer any questions. | 01:19:39 | |
| Thank you. Are there any questions for staff at this time? | 01:19:46 | |
| Council Member Martinez. | 01:19:54 | |
| Yes. Is this where we can also ask so that we have permission to use like the city letterhead if we want to do recommendation | 01:19:56 | |
| letters of recommendation for students that are going to college and. | 01:20:01 | |
| And anything like that, yes, I believe that Letterheads are included in in our policy. And I only say I believe because I know | 01:20:07 | |
| like. | 01:20:12 | |
| I've memorized like 4 cities and I get a mixed up sometimes so. | 01:20:17 | |
| Thank you. Page 24. | 01:20:23 | |
| And so currently. | 01:20:27 | |
| Let me see. Exactly. We can't. Yeah. Currently it says city letterhead shall be used by the mayor, mayor Pro Tem and council for | 01:20:31 | |
| official city business, communication of adopted city policies and positions, correspondence and related communications. All | 01:20:37 | |
| council members and city manager should be copied on correspondence signed by the mayor, other council member. Use of the city | 01:20:43 | |
| letterhead and or title on personal matters is not permitted. | 01:20:48 | |
| So that's the current rule. Yeah, I would. I would like us to. | 01:20:55 | |
| Have the permission to use them on. | 01:20:59 | |
| Letters of recommendation for students that are going to college, I think that would benefit our community. | 01:21:02 | |
| And specifically our youth. | 01:21:09 | |
| Any further discussion on this item? | 01:21:13 | |
| Any comments? | 01:21:17 | |
| I've written several letters of recommendation and initially I was using letterhead and then we developed this then so I started | 01:21:18 | |
| using just blank paper. But I do think it would make the letter of recommendation more strong and I don't think that we would, as | 01:21:25 | |
| my understanding is that if I write a letter on behalf of somebody. | 01:21:33 | |
| I don't need to share it with the rest of the council, right, If it's on letterhead or that's the only concern or question I have. | 01:21:41 | |
| We were just talking over here about whether or not we see any potential like liability or anything, and I don't think we do. I | 01:21:49 | |
| think that is essentially a council. It would be up to the council whether they want to make that policy change. | 01:21:55 | |
| In my opinion, that's definitely a policy issue for this board to decide how it wants to handle it. | 01:22:01 | |
| OK. Thank you. Councilmember Hernandez, do you have a question or comment on this? | 01:22:07 | |
| You cut out council member, you went mute. | 01:22:15 | |
| Sorry about that. Yeah, I have some concerns about using city letterhead for recommendations of individuals who the full council | 01:22:18 | |
| doesn't know I. | 01:22:23 | |
| And I, I would, I would think if we did allow that, that it would have to be on a case by case basis. It would be something that | 01:22:30 | |
| would have to come to the full council or the letter at least share it with the council members. I think it's a. | 01:22:36 | |
| It has a tendency to become political. | 01:22:44 | |
| If one council member, for instance, is running for office and then wants to issue letters of recommendations to students of | 01:22:50 | |
| constituencies and sends out hundreds of letters, I just don't think it's an appropriate use of our letterhead and I I think it it | 01:22:57 | |
| could be risky in that way and becoming too political. | 01:23:04 | |
| Do you have any comment on this? | 01:23:12 | |
| Yes, I I I tend to agree. | 01:23:15 | |
| So for me, a letterhead means if you, if you're using the city's letterhead, that means that it is a city supported. And that's | 01:23:21 | |
| not the case if an individual council member is sending it. And so I have, I would have concerns with that. So as as someone who | 01:23:29 | |
| worked for the military for many years, there were just very few people who could sign on the commander's letterhead because it | 01:23:37 | |
| meant that the commanders is the commander's responsibility, his word. | 01:23:45 | |
| And so I I'm with Councilmember Hernandez now if there was a standard letter that was vetted by the council and I. | 01:23:53 | |
| And council members were signing off. I would see it a little different but for an individual to write his words, his thoughts. | 01:24:04 | |
| On letterhead from the city. I just don't think that's appropriate. | 01:24:13 | |
| I agree in part on this because it is when you're writing on a letterhead it's considered official business from coming from the | 01:24:17 | |
| city, so I think. | 01:24:21 | |
| In that regard, all the Council should be. | 01:24:25 | |
| Brought into the discussion and maybe it be mentioned at a council meeting if somebody a request to be done, maybe more | 01:24:29 | |
| involvement at the council before just sending out letters of recommendation. | 01:24:35 | |
| As the person needs, so would there would a consideration be for approval, some type of approval process or notification to | 01:24:42 | |
| council maybe like like asking permission like hey, just like if I was to come to council and say hey, just I would like to use | 01:24:49 | |
| one of the Letterheads for a letter of recommendation for us XY student, you know? | 01:24:56 | |
| Because that way we're not doing say hundreds, you know, I don't, I don't think that's right. But I do think that it, it makes a | 01:25:05 | |
| big difference when we do write a letter of recommendation with the city letterhead and it feels more official and I think it | 01:25:10 | |
| gives. | 01:25:15 | |
| A better chance for the students that are getting those letters of recommendation. So establishing a type of process. | 01:25:21 | |
| Councilmember Hernandez. | 01:25:25 | |
| Yeah, I have another question. So, Councilman Martinez, are you talking about your students? | 01:25:29 | |
| Yes. | 01:25:35 | |
| OK. So I think that's a conflict of interest. | 01:25:36 | |
| How so you're gaining favor using using a city resource to reward your your students. And I think it's going to cause us to get | 01:25:41 | |
| into discussions about say you do bring a letter and you want council approval on a letter of recommendation for a student that | 01:25:51 | |
| you've known maybe for six months, maybe a year, maybe just during the the, the length of you know, their their year. | 01:26:01 | |
| In your classroom, maybe that's not long enough to really, you know, maybe for me when I write a letter of recommendation for | 01:26:11 | |
| somebody, I want to know that that I've had years of experience knowing this person, not just a short time. So it's I think it's | 01:26:18 | |
| going to lend itself into getting those kinds of into those kinds of discussions and we could really get bogged down in that. | 01:26:25 | |
| And I just, I would, I would suggest just staying away from that and creating your own personal letterhead and using that. | 01:26:33 | |
| Instead. | 01:26:42 | |
| But again, this is this is just something that we're discussing. Yeah, I don't, if I may. | 01:27:17 | |
| I don't think this is worth the hassle, so to speak, and each one of us has to determine if. | 01:27:25 | |
| The person that approaches us is worthy of a letter of recommendation, I mean. | 01:27:34 | |
| I've had people come to Waimea Beach cleanup that you know, I write a not a letterhead, but I confirm that they have performed 810 | 01:27:38 | |
| hours of community service to satisfy whatever. | 01:27:44 | |
| Person they need to satisfy. | 01:27:52 | |
| So I'm OK with without the letterhead and. | 01:27:54 | |
| But. | 01:27:58 | |
| The second part of the conversation is then OK if, and I did, I wrote numerous record letters for Camino. | 01:27:59 | |
| And. | 01:28:09 | |
| When I do it on, when I've done it on blank white piece of paper, I'll sign it. City Council member Gama. | 01:28:09 | |
| And so. | 01:28:18 | |
| Made perhaps a whole nother conversation but I think it clearly is coming from me and not the council and so making it clear that | 01:28:19 | |
| this is a letter of recommendation from me as an individual on. | 01:28:26 | |
| Non city letterhead is OK, correct? Well, so on in the current policy, that same section right now that what it says exactly is | 01:28:33 | |
| use of city letterhead and or title on personal matters is not permitted. So technically right now the IT shouldn't be on | 01:28:41 | |
| letterhead and it shouldn't include the City Council title. | 01:28:49 | |
| Unless we change the policy, whether to change that policy would be Councils decision. | 01:28:57 | |
| And that's really actually fairly customary for council members to not use the City Council letterhead, but also in something like | 01:29:02 | |
| a recommendation, they would identify themselves as a council member, but speaking on their own behalf. So that's really the | 01:29:09 | |
| custom and practice that I've observed. | 01:29:16 | |
| I don't know if that helps you. So you're talking about keep #1 the first recommendation staying in the second. Most cities don't | 01:29:24 | |
| have that second part of that. That's what you're saying by using their title. That's correct. | 01:29:30 | |
| I think the key there, and it is something we've talked about is I think it is the key there is maybe the maybe including some | 01:29:39 | |
| language about identifying that it's written. | 01:29:43 | |
| That it's written on personal. I'm trying to think of, you know, where do you have City Council? Yeah, yeah. | 01:29:50 | |
| OK, I would agree to that. | 01:29:57 | |
| Is our policy section 3AB and C is? Is that In Sync with the? | 01:30:02 | |
| Section 2. | 01:30:08 | |
| Speaking for the city versus correspondence from individual council members, I looked at it really quickly and. | 01:30:10 | |
| I think I saw a little bit of a conflict there. | 01:30:19 | |
| So section speaking for the city of correspondence from council members, correspondence from council, then on the next page you | 01:30:24 | |
| have speaking for the city. | 01:30:29 | |
| So, so where where this conversation kind of. | 01:30:35 | |
| Causes me a little bit of. | 01:30:40 | |
| Not trouble, but. | 01:30:43 | |
| Emails, you know, make it my personal policy to try to respond to every e-mail that we receive as a council. | 01:30:45 | |
| OK, now am I supposed to make sure that all the council members got that e-mail? And if I respond, do I copy all the council | 01:30:52 | |
| members? And now that I've copied all the council members, now are we creating a Brown Act situation where some other council | 01:30:59 | |
| member will say, yeah, yeah, yeah, no, no, no. I mean, I just, I think that's where potentially maybe boiling this down to the the | 01:31:05 | |
| basic premise of. | 01:31:11 | |
| And I think there is maybe we can come up with some general language we can share with everybody that can be kind of used to give | 01:31:50 | |
| that message. But I think that's where where you see that conflict. It's that in some sections it says basically like if you have | 01:31:56 | |
| the cities approval, you can do this. But in another section it says if you don't have the cities approval, you can't do those | 01:32:02 | |
| things. And and in general when members of the public e-mail. | 01:32:08 | |
| And it's not something that we've had on an agenda that's going to be the responses. You know, I can only answer you right now as | 01:32:15 | |
| an individual because we haven't deliberated on that yet. But my opinion is this. And so I don't know if the recommendation or the | 01:32:22 | |
| best practices in here, but if I respond to a resident. | 01:32:29 | |
| My practice is to copy the city manager. | 01:32:36 | |
| Not my fellow council persons, because that's fine. | 01:32:39 | |
| It's essentially a choice for me is you don't have to copy anybody, but I appreciate if you copy me because then I sort of have a | 01:32:43 | |
| sense of what's going on and you know, what questions are being asked. Sometimes people forget to include me on the original | 01:32:49 | |
| e-mail. So there's been a couple recently where I didn't see their e-mail come in, but I saw somebody's reply. So I knew that | 01:32:55 | |
| there was an issue going on. So we were able to address it. So, so I think, I think that's a fine practice. | 01:33:01 | |
| We're going to amend that. | 01:33:46 | |
| I have a question too about UM. | 01:33:50 | |
| The practice of. | 01:33:53 | |
| Having the clerk share correspondence now, what we're doing here doesn't change that, right When something comes in by mail. | 01:33:55 | |
| And it's addressed to. | 01:34:05 | |
| I guess. | 01:34:08 | |
| I don't know that. I don't know that we all get it if it's if it's like addressed to the city in general. | 01:34:10 | |
| The city clerk still needs to make sure that we have, that it's shared with everybody, right, right. So it wouldn't impact that. | 01:34:16 | |
| It would just, we're, I think what we're talking about would be be just making sure that if anybody were to reply to that, that | 01:34:22 | |
| they're not replying on behalf of the of the council or the city. | 01:34:28 | |
| For me SO. | 01:34:35 | |
| There was a situation where a person wrote a. | 01:34:38 | |
| Not so flattering letter to my 4 colleagues and. | 01:34:42 | |
| Of course it was about me and didn't include me in it. And that's the situation in our policy manual where who triggers like, oh, | 01:34:47 | |
| hey, by the way, this came in and you know. | 01:34:52 | |
| Because. | 01:34:58 | |
| And it's in the policy manual like so if I get an e-mail. | 01:35:01 | |
| And I see that. | 01:35:05 | |
| Two other council members were copied and not the other two. It's my responsibility to bring it to the city manager. So it could | 01:35:06 | |
| be or who. How do we handle that? | 01:35:10 | |
| Right. But our manual says if a majority, what if they're sending it to three? I think he's wanting to yeah, left out. OK, So what | 01:35:48 | |
| is the process? | 01:35:52 | |
| So again, the OR maybe the distinction there and Joan can speak if I'm. | 01:35:57 | |
| Wrong here, but if somebody sends it to three and says to the City Council, but they only send it to three and we see that, we | 01:36:02 | |
| make sure we send it to everybody. | 01:36:07 | |
| Because there's a possibility that maybe they correct and, and that's something you can do if you notice, hey, I saw it and it | 01:36:12 | |
| says to everybody, but it's only really gone to two people because some people just don't have everybody's e-mail address. So | 01:36:17 | |
| that's something. And we've been, I would say we've been trying to do that more of when we see those and we see them address to | 01:36:22 | |
| the full council, we make sure everybody has it. | 01:36:27 | |
| But the maybe the Gray area becomes when somebody just emails 3 individually and doesn't, you know, and we don't know they emailed | 01:36:34 | |
| three and they don't say they emailed 3. | 01:36:39 | |
| Which happens on occasion, yes. | 01:36:44 | |
| Because you mentioned this before and I've been. | 01:36:49 | |
| I can't hear Martha. I think that I think the situation that you're referring to. | 01:36:52 | |
| All the council members got a blind copy, so we didn't know who got it. When I got it, I thought I was the only person who got it. | 01:36:57 | |
| So I was like, I'm not even going to respond to this. And then we were here on the day as then we heard everybody got it. We're | 01:37:03 | |
| like, oh, OK, everybody got it. So that's what happened on that. | 01:37:08 | |
| Just so you know, it was blind copy to everybody, so no one knew someone else received it. I thought it was just to me. | 01:37:14 | |
| So our practice would be when we see that and we and we catch that and if it says to everybody but but we don't think it went to | 01:37:20 | |
| everybody, we will go, we over communicate, we will try to share it with everybody. Are there any further questions or comments on | 01:37:26 | |
| this specific section? | 01:37:31 | |
| If nothing else, I'm going to just go by section by section as we amend and then do a vote to approve what we've discussed as the | 01:37:40 | |
| changes. | 01:37:44 | |
| Is everybody clear on good? | 01:37:49 | |
| I didn't know if you wanted to ask for public comment just before we yes, yeah, OK, yes. Are there any public comments on there | 01:37:52 | |
| are no public comments, but just wanted to clarify. Thank you. So is everyone clear as to what we're we're going to be changing or | 01:37:57 | |
| modifying this section as to. | 01:38:03 | |
| Yeah, the correspondence from councils and this. | 01:38:10 | |
| Could I just have the city manager or the city attorney? | 01:38:13 | |
| Repeat. I I think I was, I was OK with it, but I just could I just hear it again yeah. We were trying to see if we need to | 01:38:17 | |
| actually change the language or not. I think what we're I think the consensus that we've heard so far was that I. | 01:38:24 | |
| Maybe that language right now that says the title can't be on it isn't really what was intended, as long as it's clear that you're | 01:38:32 | |
| not writing it as a council member. So I think we can propose some language, you know, and I think it's just removing. | 01:38:39 | |
| Or I would suggest adding the language that we're talking about of saying, you know. | 01:38:47 | |
| A. A title. | 01:38:54 | |
| Use of letterhead and or title on personal matters is not permitted and maybe adding at the end there and except for the specific | 01:38:56 | |
| statement. | 01:39:00 | |
| And and those are for emails, not for letterhead. Letters on letterhead. | 01:39:08 | |
| Right. This is not using city, that's helpful. So it's for the personal stationary section, okay. | 01:39:13 | |
| So we'll prepare some. I think the direction then is we'll just. | 01:39:22 | |
| We'll prepare a disclaimer. Yeah, Yeah. So maybe we can just say in there something like. | 01:39:26 | |
| A council member should use the provided disclaimer for any. | 01:39:34 | |
| Individual responses? Any individual responses? e-mail response? e-mail responses? What about regarding the letterhead? | 01:39:41 | |
| But we're confusing the two items now. | 01:39:50 | |
| E-mail. e-mail is separate from personal and no, yeah, we're not changing it. You can use your own letterhead, but you have to | 01:39:53 | |
| still. | 01:39:57 | |
| Make the disclaimer. | 01:40:02 | |
| That right, not speaking on behalf of the city and just to be clear, a letter of recommendation is a personnel matter, a personal | 01:40:04 | |
| matter. | 01:40:08 | |
| So council is not OK with that. That's that's what I'm hearing right now. | 01:40:13 | |
| Of course. | 01:40:22 | |
| I'm a little confused. I thought on number one we were saying the use of letterhead. | 01:40:25 | |
| On personal matters. | 01:40:31 | |
| Is prohibited, but that you can use your. | 01:40:34 | |
| Council title. | 01:40:39 | |
| In the signature, I thought that's what our city attorney was referring to earlier. Yes, I think a disclaimer, I think it's that | 01:40:41 | |
| and or title like I think we should remove that and that section's just letterhead. And so the answer that keeps it simpler. | 01:40:48 | |
| Basically letterhead can't be used on personal matters and then personal stationary we add that sentence. | 01:40:55 | |
| Everybody good. | 01:41:03 | |
| So I just, I just want to confirm so no one else is on my side in terms of, you know, wanting to do something good and make a | 01:41:04 | |
| letter of recommendation look good first for a student. | 01:41:09 | |
| Not on the city letterhead because it implies city business is when you're losing the city letterhead. | 01:41:16 | |
| So official city business. | 01:41:21 | |
| So I think the thought would be that. | 01:41:25 | |
| You could use your. | 01:41:28 | |
| Statement saying I am a council member but I'm not writing it on behalf of the council. But then the consensus. The consensus is | 01:41:30 | |
| not on letterhead. | 01:41:35 | |
| OK, so let's take a vote on that then. | 01:41:46 | |
| Can I get a first section emotion to approve that? | 01:41:48 | |
| Move to approve. | 01:41:54 | |
| A second, second I'll 2nd. | 01:41:56 | |
| Councilmember. | 01:42:03 | |
| Yes, Council Member Hernandez. Yes, Councilmember Martinez. | 01:42:06 | |
| Yes, Mayor Pro Tem McQueen Lashawn, Yes. And Mayor Perez, Yes. Motion passes unanimously. | 01:42:11 | |
| OK, next section and you want to start with the next section. | 01:42:21 | |
| What section is the next section? Are you going to go by chapter or by? Yeah, we should just go in order. | 01:42:25 | |
| Anything jumps out at anyone, we are on page. | 01:42:32 | |
| We just finished with. | 01:42:36 | |
| We're in Chapter 7. | 01:42:38 | |
| Because I have something in chapter 20. Well, then we should probably go back. | 01:42:40 | |
| Unless somebody held something in chapter one. | 01:42:48 | |
| OK. | 01:42:51 | |
| This will start in chapter 2. | 01:42:55 | |
| OK, go ahead, Council Member Hernandez. OK, so I think you're all familiar with this provision that under Section 4, number B, | 01:42:57 | |
| this is Chapter 2, World City Council. Council member appointments and assignments. What is the process? My question is, what is | 01:43:05 | |
| the process for seeking approval Council member appointments to boards and commissions of outside agencies? We've never exercised | 01:43:13 | |
| that provision when, for instance, I'm on the Ventura County Library Foundation. | 01:43:21 | |
| I'm on the League of Women Voters. I've never come to City Council and asked for approval to be on those. | 01:43:29 | |
| To be a member of those organizations, to be on their boards and commissions, I don't understand the purpose of this and I don't | 01:43:37 | |
| know the history behind it. | 01:43:41 | |
| Is that something we need, we we need or can we just line that out or do you think it's important to have? | 01:43:47 | |
| The rationale for it and again whether or not council agrees, that's the purpose of the item, but I think the rationale was | 01:43:56 | |
| specifically this is for city boards, commissions and committees. So it's when the city. | 01:44:02 | |
| The city has a representative on a board, Commission or committee versus. | 01:44:10 | |
| Each council member could be on a committee as an individual. You could be asked to be on a committee. And, and I don't know | 01:44:17 | |
| because I don't know all of them off hand, but you mentioned like the League of Women Voters. I don't think that's one as an | 01:44:22 | |
| example, that I don't think the city has a position on it, I think. | 01:44:28 | |
| They specifically requested Councilmember Hernandez to join it. So. | 01:44:34 | |
| That's an example where. | 01:44:40 | |
| If the League Women Voters came to the city and said we'd like a member of your council on the committee, then this would be the | 01:44:42 | |
| process for us to figure out who it would be. But the League of of Women Voters. | 01:44:48 | |
| Manages. | 01:44:54 | |
| Important activities for us. | 01:44:57 | |
| And it says here, there's clear language in here. Sorry, Councilman Gama, I didn't mean to earn her up. But it says here council | 01:44:59 | |
| members who are serving as representatives of the city. So when I'm on these committees, I'm not representing the city. | 01:45:06 | |
| I'm on those. | 01:45:15 | |
| Those commissions and those boards as an individual, yeah. But when, when that said organization is organizing our debates, for | 01:45:17 | |
| example. | 01:45:21 | |
| Kind of a conflict. | 01:45:27 | |
| It's. It's not a conflict if. | 01:45:28 | |
| They've they've addressed that in the past and it's not a conflict. I think it is. Well that can be easily said with for instance, | 01:45:32 | |
| the Boys and Girls Club, that we have a Boys and Girls Club here and I am a city representative on the Boys and Girls Club board. | 01:45:39 | |
| But nobody approved me to get on that. I just, they just asked me to join. I didn't put it before council to approve. | 01:45:46 | |
| Placed on there by this committee. | 01:46:29 | |
| OK, so one other question. So when I go to VC Animal Services. | 01:47:09 | |
| And. | 01:47:15 | |
| Involved in. | 01:47:17 | |
| An issue which I'm going to cast a vote. | 01:47:19 | |
| Am I speaking on behalf of the city? | 01:47:22 | |
| Believe you've been appointed to that as the city representative so I don't have to come back to the city and say hey guys. | 01:47:25 | |
| No, but that's always been sort of a weird thing too. And my recommendation everybody. So I've had that question asked before, | 01:47:32 | |
| Councilmember said. I don't know how everybody would want to vote on this. And it's pretty much when you're appointed. | 01:47:36 | |
| Make your best guess of, you know, what the city and the council fill, or if you really aren't sure, bring it back to council and | 01:47:41 | |
| we can have an item on it. So So yeah. But yeah, that in that case you're representing the city. | 01:47:47 | |
| Council Member Hernandez, does that satisfy your? Yeah, that's fine. I'm glad we had that discussion. | 01:47:53 | |
| And I don't want to belabor this this this whole item, but I also thought that we. | 01:48:01 | |
| Need to add guidelines to address the role of alternates on committees because they vary according to agency. I mean some agencies | 01:48:08 | |
| operate just you are the fill in when the primary person can't be there. And then there's other committees where the alternate | 01:48:17 | |
| actually has responsibilities and duties and I think for the benefit of future council members. | 01:48:26 | |
| It might be helpful to have that in our policies and procedures just to this an acknowledgement of what the role of alternates can | 01:48:37 | |
| be. | 01:48:42 | |
| Well, it would, it would vary by committee, right, Because right. So it would have to yeah. The statement would have to say that | 01:48:47 | |
| the role of all there are primary and alternates assigned to city appointed committees. The role of alternate can vary according | 01:48:55 | |
| to the according to the committee structure. Please, you know, refer to the committee chair or the committee executive director | 01:49:02 | |
| for instructions on on the role of the alternate. | 01:49:10 | |
| Something like that I always go by the more the merrier and. | 01:49:18 | |
| You've attended just about every Beacon meeting I can remember as an alternate and nobody's ever asked you not to speak. Or you've | 01:49:23 | |
| been given the the floor and, and I'm fine with it. And I don't know, that's just me. | 01:49:31 | |
| And that's like I said, that's very different from, for instance, VRSD where I just if Martha can't attend, then I go in her place | 01:49:40 | |
| and vote on her behalf. But. | 01:49:46 | |
| I don't attend the meetings while she's there. | 01:49:53 | |
| Into Washington. So it just varies. | 01:49:57 | |
| I think it's like you said, it's it's case by case depending on the committee and the rules of the committee's, for instance V | 01:50:00 | |
| Cog. | 01:50:03 | |
| Alternates don't have a role. | 01:50:07 | |
| If the main is there and then other. | 01:50:09 | |
| SO11 thought would be on the on these county agencies and everything. | 01:50:14 | |
| They they essentially set the rules and so whatever they say goes. I think I think that's what she's saying. That's the agreement. | 01:50:21 | |
| Everybody goes by every committee is a question for us would just be on our committees right now. We don't have a rule. So it's | 01:50:25 | |
| just if. | 01:50:30 | |
| Right now there's no rule on city Commission, city committees, and so if we wanted to create a rule, we could do that. But | 01:50:37 | |
| otherwise? | 01:50:41 | |
| Do we have any city committees? We have city committees. We have a report from 1:00 tonight actually. Museum committee is an | 01:50:46 | |
| example. And so you know, it's just we don't have a rule, so I think. | 01:50:53 | |
| And we have Sister City and we have the Arts Committee. Those are other, yeah. And so right now, you know, in general, it's | 01:51:01 | |
| basically. | 01:51:06 | |
| There isn't a rule on that. And so if the question would be if we wanted a rule or not and we want to leave it the way it is, but | 01:51:11 | |
| otherwise I think the county boards, they pretty much will tell us what they expect of the alternates. So I think we just follow | 01:51:16 | |
| that, OK. | 01:51:20 | |
| Any other sections? | 01:51:28 | |
| Anyone want to talk about specifically? | 01:51:30 | |
| I'm still on Section 2. Let's see chapter 2, Section 5. | 01:51:32 | |
| This has to do code of ethics for council members and this is item B 10, positive workplace environment, the way that the policy | 01:51:40 | |
| and procedures reads when it talks about a positive workplace environment. I also saw the same kind of language in Chapter 5 | 01:51:47 | |
| regarding relationship and conduct. It speaks to the relationship between council members and staff, but it doesn't speak to the | 01:51:55 | |
| relationship. | 01:52:02 | |
| Between council members and I think that's important to include. | 01:52:10 | |
| That we should be exercising and creating a positive, constructive workplace environment for not only city employees, but for | 01:52:14 | |
| fellow council members, members of the public, and business dealings with the city. That's the language that I suggest for Section | 01:52:20 | |
| 5. | 01:52:27 | |
| Letter B, item number 10. I agree with that. Are we city employees? Yes. | 01:52:35 | |
| Then, when necessary, employees and. | 01:52:41 | |
| Yeah, in this case I would say, because that intent of that language is to basically say that as council members you should talk | 01:52:45 | |
| to me and not complain about staff people or two staff people directly. So in that way there's a distinction between the council | 01:52:51 | |
| member and the employee. | 01:52:56 | |
| In that section, So what I was looking for is, and I, I said I've got a few of these handbooks in my mind. So I thought there was | 01:53:03 | |
| a section that said something like rules of decorum for the council. | 01:53:09 | |
| And so maybe not, maybe we should create a section for rules of decorum. Well, there is something on that page 12, but it looks | 01:53:17 | |
| like now that I'm looking at it, maybe that's more specific to decorum for the council meetings, even though it says. | 01:53:24 | |
| Public participation and rules of decorum for council, Yes. | 01:53:33 | |
| OK. | 01:53:39 | |
| So. | 01:53:42 | |
| I think maybe adding language? | 01:53:43 | |
| To that section. | 01:53:47 | |
| Yeah, for, for we and we can come up with some language. Maybe what we do if we're, if we'll have a few changes, is we can come up | 01:53:51 | |
| with some language and bring it back. I mean, because it does, it does talk about principles. Under principles and standards, | 01:53:57 | |
| council member conduct, the professional and personal conduct of council members must be above reproach and by the law must avoid | 01:54:04 | |
| even the appearance of impropriety. | 01:54:10 | |
| Which is critically important for maintaining a positive and productive image of city governance. So. | 01:54:16 | |
| Well, it is understood that council members enjoy First Amendment rights. They should practice ability and decorum and discussion | 01:54:24 | |
| debate, I would add there and outside of City Council, not just when we're at the Dyess, but also outside and refrain from abusive | 01:54:32 | |
| contact, personal charges and I'm substantiated allegations. I guess that's my point, that things happen outside the council | 01:54:39 | |
| chambers and I think that we need to hold ourselves accountable for our behavior not only inside council chambers but outside. | 01:54:46 | |
| OK, so you will get together and create some rules of decorum for council outside of council meetings. Well, we'll come up with | 01:54:56 | |
| some language, put it back in or put it in, and then we'll put it on a consent agenda. Is that good, Council Member Hernandez? | 01:55:02 | |
| Yeah, I think so. Do we want to vote on that? | 01:55:07 | |
| OK, well then we'll just wait. OK. Anyone else in sections? | 01:55:15 | |
| No, I think they're gonna. I think he just wrote it down. I think we have direction. Yeah. | 01:55:28 | |
| OK. I think that's all I have for now. OK. | 01:55:33 | |
| And and again, no public comments on this item. | 01:55:38 | |
| No public comments on. Thank you. | 01:55:44 | |
| All right, so seeing that is all the changes. | 01:55:47 | |
| Before we move on and vote on that. | 01:55:51 | |
| Well, we don't need to vote on anything else, OK? | 01:55:54 | |
| So I think we're done. | 01:56:00 | |
| We'll move on to Item 15. | 01:56:01 | |
| Item 15 is the Fort Wayne Historical Museum ad hoc committee status and request to reconstitute the Port Hueneme Historical Museum | 01:56:05 | |
| Commission. | 01:56:10 | |
| And we have. | 01:56:16 | |
| Charles Deputy City Manager Charles Perez. | 01:56:18 | |
| And Parks and Rec manager Anna Haley. | 01:56:22 | |
| Yep, and I know they've been meeting with the. | 01:56:25 | |
| Museum committee frequently, I think they're on a bi weekly meeting schedule now to try to get reopened. So this staff report, the | 01:56:28 | |
| intent is basically to report back on and do a status report on what the ad hoc committees been working on and then. | 01:56:36 | |
| As they start to get ready to reopen to talk about what their request is to move forward, so. | 01:56:46 | |
| OK. | 01:56:54 | |
| Good evening Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem, City Council, members of the public and fellow city staff members. So, as the city manager has | 01:56:56 | |
| indicated, item number 15 is intended to provide an update on the museum rehabilitation project and allow the council to consider | 01:57:03 | |
| the ad hoc committees request to reconstitute the Port Hueneme Historical Museum Commission. | 01:57:09 | |
| By way of brief background about. | 01:57:20 | |
| Almost nearly 50 years ago, Port Hueneme City Council approved bylaws for a historical museum Commission. | 01:57:23 | |
| The bylaws empowered the Commission to quote, manage, operate and regulate the historical museum. | 01:57:30 | |
| For decades, the museum's operations have been extensively supported by the Commission and community volunteers. | 01:57:36 | |
| And during that time a wide variet. | 01:57:43 | |
| By the end of 2017, the Museum Commission ceased holding public meetings and effectively. | 01:57:50 | |
| To repeat. | 01:57:57 | |
| Sorry. | 01:58:00 | |
| No problem. | 01:58:01 | |
| By the end of 2017, the Commission stopped holding meetings, and although volunteers continued, the Commission itself didn't | 01:58:04 | |
| continue to operate as a body. A few years later, the City Strategic Plan noted the need to develop a plan to update the mission, | 01:58:11 | |
| establish existing policies, and increase educational programming associated with the museum. | 01:58:19 | |
| In 2022, a visioning charette was held to help shape the museum's future. | 01:58:27 | |
| This full day event included staff, community stakeholders, and a member of the City Council Was focused on defining the museum's | 01:58:32 | |
| mission, identifying necessary facility improvements, and reviewing collection practices. | 01:58:38 | |
| The effort resulted in a new mission statement which reads The mission of the Port Hueneme Historical Museum is to preserve the | 01:58:46 | |
| history and celebrate the people of Port Hueneme. | 01:58:51 | |
| And it developped a three-year action plan, concluding with the museum reopening in 2025. | 01:58:57 | |
| In September of 2022, the Council created an ad hoc Museum Governance committee to work on the items included in the three-year | 01:59:08 | |
| action plan. | 01:59:12 | |
| This group included six community members, a representative and alternate from the City Council and city staff members. | 01:59:17 | |
| In December 2023, the council approved a revised plan which called for the museum to reopen in the summer of 2024. | 01:59:25 | |
| As part of this action, the. | 01:59:34 | |
| The cost and scope of facility improvements was reduced and it was noted that some components of the initial plan would begin or | 01:59:36 | |
| continue after museum opening. | 01:59:42 | |
| The committee and city staff have worked to relaunch the speaker series, create and display pop-up museum exhibits and multiple | 01:59:49 | |
| events, package and move museum exhibits and artifacts into storage. | 01:59:55 | |
| Hatch and paint the facility and select Purchase and install a portable restroom at the rear of the museum. | 02:00:02 | |
| Currently, the committee is working with staff to develop a revised floor plan, determine the exhibits to be displayed and select | 02:00:08 | |
| display cases, pedestals and lighting for the museum. | 02:00:13 | |
| So the photos on this slide are two examples of what the museum looked like in the past few years ago. | 02:00:21 | |
| You'll see many different artifacts and items on the wall and. | 02:00:29 | |
| Floor space somewhat limited. | 02:00:35 | |
| So this slide shows the floor plan that has been developed with staff working with the committee and the planned approach moving | 02:00:40 | |
| forward. | 02:00:45 | |
| Some of those items are a bit small. The light green indicates. | 02:00:51 | |
| The storyboards that would be on the walls surrounding the main. | 02:00:56 | |
| Entry room. | 02:01:01 | |
| The. | 02:01:03 | |
| The blue items represent the primary exhibits that would be on display in the main room, and the red elongated ovals in the middle | 02:01:05 | |
| are seating areas. And then you'll notice that the the top of the diagram there, the vault area is has been identified or proposed | 02:01:13 | |
| as the Bard room. It would have an array of items pertaining to the Bard family. The item of the room on the back right there | 02:01:20 | |
| interactive room is at this time designed. | 02:01:27 | |
| To be interactive and designed to engage children and museum items. And for the time being, as the museum opens the item at the | 02:01:35 | |
| top left, there would be the room where volunteers would do ongoing work, including inventory efforts and other items associated | 02:01:41 | |
| with getting the entirety of the museum up and running. | 02:01:48 | |
| And this is a photo just taken last week. It is not a final photo, but it's an in progress photo. | 02:01:58 | |
| The item was was cleaned up. | 02:02:05 | |
| Number of large scale items have been placed both in the vault adjacent to the vault and then right there in the the center area. | 02:02:08 | |
| So again, not a final but it's an in progress. | 02:02:12 | |
| Image of what currently exists. | 02:02:19 | |
| So future plans. Our plan is to reopen the museum on Saturday, July 6th. Initially the plan would be to have the museum open on | 02:02:25 | |
| Saturdays and Sundays from 11:00 AM to 3:00 PM. | 02:02:31 | |
| This would be. | 02:02:39 | |
| I use the term staff very loosely there, so maybe more appropriately would be manned by volunteers and that is the. | 02:02:41 | |
| Those are the days and the times right now that are. | 02:02:50 | |
| The volunteer group is able to. | 02:02:54 | |
| Consider it is planned that there would be an expansion of days and hours as the. | 02:02:58 | |
| Volunteer program gets restarted. The plan, the request, as I said at the beginning from the ad hoc committee, is that the Council | 02:03:04 | |
| consider the establishment or the reconstitution of a historical museum Commission. | 02:03:11 | |
| And in their vote, they made it clear that they want this to be an active hands on working Commission. They would be responsible | 02:03:18 | |
| for training and scheduling the volunteers as docents for the museum. They would want responsibility for developing and managing | 02:03:24 | |
| programs at the museum. | 02:03:30 | |
| They would want responsibility for creating, revising, formalizing, curation and collection policies. | 02:03:37 | |
| They would be actively involved in inventorying items and working with staff to establish Providence information about the items, | 02:03:44 | |
| and they would also be interested in marketing and promoting the museum via social media and potentially a newsletter. And as | 02:03:49 | |
| noted in the staff report, they would be interested in returning annually to council to provide an update on their actions and the | 02:03:55 | |
| status of the museum. | 02:04:00 | |
| So what's presented to you tonight once again is an overview of the status of the museum project. | 02:04:12 | |
| And also an opportunity for the Council to consider the ad hoc committees request to reconstitute the Port Hueneme Historical | 02:04:19 | |
| Museum Commission. | 02:04:25 | |
| Staff is prepared to answer questions that the council may have and take any direction it deems appropriate. Thank you City deputy | 02:04:31 | |
| city manager. Do we have language on the? | 02:04:37 | |
| Commission that was before do we is that is like a. | 02:04:44 | |
| Yeah. Is there anything Shane with like with the how it all laid out those Oh yes, two comments. The second attachment I believe | 02:04:48 | |
| to the report are the bylaws that were previously approved by council. So that outlined what had been envisioned. Again, that was | 02:04:56 | |
| decades ago. So it is not necessarily suggested that those bylaws be. | 02:05:03 | |
| Used specifically, but that was what was created in the 70s as a guide for the purpose that the Commission served at that time. Do | 02:05:12 | |
| you have recommendation on how to change that and update it? | 02:05:17 | |
| That is something that we would bring back if the Council provides direction that this is. | 02:05:22 | |
| Approved, and that's the direction that the Council wishes. | 02:05:27 | |
| Is there any other questions for stuff? Sorry America. Can I just add because your question was sort of the exact question that we | 02:05:30 | |
| were talking about. | 02:05:34 | |
| Yeah, I don't know what happened last time around. Do we have any historical perspective on how the Commission just stopped | 02:06:13 | |
| meeting? I mean, was the museum open? Was it closed? But how did it? Was it officially disbanded or what happened? | 02:06:22 | |
| So we have not been able to find any records to indicate and we've looked with the assistance of the city clerk there. There has | 02:06:32 | |
| been no evidence that there was action by council to disband or. | 02:06:38 | |
| Remove or sunset, so to speak, the Commission. | 02:06:44 | |
| Our records indicate that meetings were held through the year, the calendar year of 2017, but there are no, there was an it was a | 02:06:48 | |
| brown act body. So we have record of the agendas that were published, but there's no record in 2018 and forward. So the museum was | 02:06:55 | |
| open in 2018 and 2019, but it does not appear that the Commission was active during that time. | 02:07:02 | |
| So my only concern or is that we set the Commission up to be successful and let's not, I mean if we don't know what I mean, | 02:07:10 | |
| clearly they stopped having meetings and so. | 02:07:17 | |
| Whatever structure we come up with, I hope it's something that we could all. | 02:07:24 | |
| Provide input and again, let's not repeat whatever happened which we don't know what happened but. | 02:07:29 | |
| I just want to see a very successful, productive Commission. | 02:07:36 | |
| And then do we? | 02:07:42 | |
| Create an organizational chart and then just let the Commission decide who's the head of the Commission or how do we do we do job | 02:07:45 | |
| descriptions? Who on boards volunteers? That would be a good thing for staff to come back and present. You said 2019. | 02:07:53 | |
| When they stopped meeting, they met through 2017, but not beyond that. I was going to say maybe it was a kovid, but that's it was | 02:08:01 | |
| prior to covic. But councilmember Gama, some of the questions that you're asking, those are exactly the type of details that we | 02:08:07 | |
| would, if given the direction from council, return with proposed ways of addressing those questions. I can't see council member | 02:08:13 | |
| Hernandez. Does she have a question or a comment? | 02:08:19 | |
| No, I'm good. Thank you. | 02:08:27 | |
| Any further questions from staff or from council? Sorry, do we have any public comments regarding this item? | 02:08:29 | |
| We have one public comment from Rich Rollins. | 02:08:35 | |
| All right. | 02:08:38 | |
| All the way from Dublin. | 02:08:42 | |
| But I don't have an Irish accent. | 02:08:48 | |
| As a member of the ad hoc committee, I want to first of all thank staff for working with the committee and made some really good | 02:08:51 | |
| strides so that this opens up in July. I think we've made some really good steps. I also want to thank Councilman McQueen for | 02:08:58 | |
| being there and like giving us support. | 02:09:05 | |
| I am a little concerned. | 02:09:14 | |
| The idea of forming a Commission. | 02:09:17 | |
| My experiences in the past, we developed a citizen Advisory Board with the idea of reducing the amount of commissions that we had | 02:09:21 | |
| in a variety of different areas. And that was probably even more important. Now when I sit through the budget and talk and you | 02:09:29 | |
| talk about that, you're going to be not hiring new staff, you're going to have to be able to provide that same amount of services | 02:09:36 | |
| and the Commission with with a Commission and it's very. | 02:09:44 | |
| Description requires a lot of staff to kind of follow it through to the Brown Act do commissions. | 02:09:52 | |
| I think. | 02:10:00 | |
| My recommendation would be to have a working board that would do a lot of these different types of responsibilities that we, you | 02:10:02 | |
| know, that have just been laid out. And that maybe perhaps a possible alternative would be to make sure that we continue to have a | 02:10:12 | |
| City Councilman as a representative to be at the board to, you know, to be of informed is what's going on and for that matter. | 02:10:22 | |
| When the Citizen Advisory Commission was developed, it was the idea that a lot of these types of things that come in. | 02:10:32 | |
| The Citizen Advisory Commission would have a representative on these various different boards or ad hoc things or. | 02:10:41 | |
| That would help provide input for the community. So bottom line is I don't personally recommend that you have a formal Commission | 02:10:48 | |
| per SE, but you do, you know, develop a committee. And then also that gives a flexibility as new people in the community want to | 02:10:57 | |
| really get involved. They don't have to do some kind of a formal process. You know, they can be involved into the committee. | 02:11:06 | |
| So that's it. Thanks. | 02:11:16 | |
| Does staff have a any comment regards to that? I think the only comment I think is. | 02:11:17 | |
| If council provides direction to to move forward, we will have the opportunity to go back and work with the committee and really | 02:11:27 | |
| figure out what will work, I think you know, and bring that back to the council. I think Rich's points are well made in that and | 02:11:34 | |
| and council member Gomez too, that the biggest thing is we want to make sure that whatever structure they have, they're able to | 02:11:42 | |
| get it done because right now there isn't a staff person that's assigned to work in the in the museum. We have liaisons, but. | 02:11:50 | |
| Leave that while we work it, work through it with them. And I do want to say one thing real quick and Rich said it too and I it's | 02:12:29 | |
| almost burying the lead. But I just want to give credit to everybody because one of the things in the presentation was that | 02:12:35 | |
| originally this was a three-year plan and we talked about that. | 02:12:40 | |
| It really hadn't even started yet, you know, is that three-year plan. So we were really looking even though the original plans of | 02:12:46 | |
| 2025, we were on pace for 2026 I think. | 02:12:50 | |
| And they're now looking at opening in July. | 02:12:56 | |
| And it's, it was a huge lift and you know, the by the foot I put in my mouth was I said I thought we could get it done and by | 02:12:58 | |
| around now and then we had the storm and we pulled all of our staff off of it and so. | 02:13:05 | |
| Big credit to facilities, recreation, public works in the committee and and somehow still staying on path and being being at the | 02:13:13 | |
| point where we're talking about opening now, which I wouldn't, I wouldn't have believed a few months ago. So I do just want to | 02:13:18 | |
| give some credit to everybody for that so. | 02:13:22 | |
| Councilmember Gama. | 02:13:28 | |
| Yes, Mr. City Manager, I would love to hear your opinion on Commission versus ad hoc. And I did hear that Commission requires a | 02:13:30 | |
| Brown Act and agendas and postings and. | 02:13:35 | |
| To Council, so it sounds like your recommendation is slightly changed. | 02:14:55 | |
| Right. So does is everyone I guess the recommendation, just to be clear, the this recommendation is from the committee, right? And | 02:15:02 | |
| so I'm not changing their recommendation, but I'm saying that if it's appropriate with council and we just heard from one | 02:15:08 | |
| committee member, but if it's appropriate with council, we can go back and work with them with both options on the table. So then | 02:15:15 | |
| is council clear on what staff is recommending? | 02:15:21 | |
| Do we have a motion to? | 02:15:28 | |
| For that. | 02:15:30 | |
| I think it's to work with the committee and come back with bylaws and some recommendations. You want to do a motion. | 02:15:31 | |
| No, nobody wants to do a motion. | 02:15:39 | |
| I move the motion. Do you have a second? | 02:15:41 | |
| Thank you. | 02:15:46 | |
| No further discussion. Can we have a vote, please, Madam Clerk Council Member Gama. | 02:15:49 | |
| Yes, Councilmember Hernandez. Yes. Councilmember Martinez. Yes. Mayor Pro Tem McQueen. Legend. Yes. And Mayor Perez. Yes. Motion | 02:15:54 | |
| passes unanimously. Thank you. | 02:15:59 | |
| Thank you. Before you all leave, I just wanted to say thank you so much for all of your support and all your help. I know when we | 02:16:06 | |
| say that folks in the room might not know exactly what that means, what are you thinking them for? But I will tell you, it seemed | 02:16:12 | |
| like every time I went to the museum, it had changed. | 02:16:18 | |
| You know, it that everything was gone and then things came back and then it was beautiful. And so just really thank you for all | 02:16:25 | |
| the work that you've done, Anna. She would listen to us take notes. Next thing you know, we've come back to the museum and what we | 02:16:32 | |
| talked about was in the room. So just really appreciate all the work that you've done. Thank you both. Thank you. | 02:16:38 | |
| I don't think we give staff enough thanks and congratulations on what they achieve. Such a small staff achieved so many great | 02:16:49 | |
| things. | 02:16:53 | |
| The final item on the list is City Priorities for City and Navy Partnership 2024. | 02:16:59 | |
| Thank you, Mayor and. | 02:17:07 | |
| This item we had, it's sort of round two in our series. We had talked about some of our key partnerships this year and really | 02:17:10 | |
| wanting to establish a. | 02:17:15 | |
| Priorities for each partnership and priorities that can really be used for so we can all be advocating for the same thing. And | 02:17:20 | |
| they can be used for talking points for when, you know, when the mayor or myself or mayor Pro Tem are are asked to speak at some | 02:17:28 | |
| of these groups and things like that. And and making sure that we have a consistent message as we work with our partners. And so | 02:17:35 | |
| the first round we did a couple meetings ago as we talked about goals related to one of our major partners, the port this year. | 02:17:43 | |
| And this is round two, which is goals for our partnership with the Navy this year. | 02:17:51 | |
| And so similar to that last one, what we did was we started with some of the things that we've heard in council meetings and some | 02:17:56 | |
| of the goals that we've had. And then we wanted to propose those and then but also have the conversation with the council if | 02:18:02 | |
| there's anything we're missing or anything else that we'd want to include. And so the key goals and these are things that I think | 02:18:09 | |
| we've heard enough that we were starting to work on them, but having a kind of that unified. | 02:18:15 | |
| Situation where we've all said these are goals, it helps because we can go to the. | 02:18:24 | |
| To the Navy and let them know these are priorities for us. But so goal one for the year was bringing the base and city communities | 02:18:29 | |
| together. And we've had some good actually initial conversations on that particular with our recreation department about how we do | 02:18:35 | |
| these events like touch a truck. And we ended up doing this already. But the first touch of truck was great, but we didn't really | 02:18:42 | |
| have a military presence and also it wasn't really advertised to the military families. And so the second time around we were able | 02:18:48 | |
| to get the military. | 02:18:55 | |
| A stronger military presence and some of their vehicles there. And then they also sent the Flyers out to the family. So also | 02:19:01 | |
| military families came and got to see how police cars worked and fire trucks work and things like that. | 02:19:07 | |
| And so it sounds simple, but one of the goals I think for us really, and that I've heard from, from the council was really sort of | 02:19:14 | |
| bringing the base in the city communities together. And maybe that in the past that maybe it had gotten a little more separate. | 02:19:22 | |
| And we talked to the base about wanting to change that. And the really positive thing was that the folks we talked with at the | 02:19:29 | |
| base said that they have the same goal. And I think they, they their recreation team actually just did a presentation. | 02:19:37 | |
| Something called something like cutting the red tape, and it was a presentation about trying to. | 02:19:44 | |
| Internally with with the base and the Navy actually pushed to look for opportunities to to have the base and the communities come | 02:19:51 | |
| together. So I think it's a good time because it's a prior. I think it's going to be a priority for both of us. | 02:19:58 | |
| Second was we had talked about traffic improvements in driver and pedestrian safety campaigns. And when we talked about those at | 02:20:06 | |
| council, we talked a little bit about, you know that this is one of those things that would be nice to be able to get the the base | 02:20:13 | |
| on board with as far as getting information out to. | 02:20:19 | |
| There are thousands of employees and, and, and people that visit the base as well, and so we identified that as a priority. | 02:20:27 | |
| Recommended priority for this year and then as we were working to prepare some of those materials that we talked about some of the | 02:20:36 | |
| informational pamphlets and things. And so with council's direction we'd be able to coordinate that and actually work with the | 02:20:41 | |
| Navy on getting that information out to. | 02:20:47 | |
| 3rd Streets and infrastructure, infrastructure projects and funding opportunities. This is one where you know, we do provide | 02:20:54 | |
| services to the to the base and we do some of our utilities actually serve the base. And so when we've been meeting with them. | 02:21:02 | |
| In my. | 02:21:12 | |
| First days with the base or with the city. Some of our meetings we had, you know, we were just. | 02:21:14 | |
| I got to play the new guy card and I just was saying like, why don't we still provide some of these services to you and why, you | 02:21:19 | |
| know, why do we provide these, but these ones, you know, went away and what can we do to change that? And I think there was | 02:21:26 | |
| interest in exploring that with both. And then, but also the base told us, you know, there's, there's grants and there's funding | 02:21:32 | |
| opportunities available for agencies that serve the base. And so, and a lot of times it helps or it really clinches it when they | 02:21:39 | |
| write a letter of support. | 02:21:45 | |
| Saying it's important to the base on their on their letterhead, which their commander is authorized to do, for the record. | 02:21:52 | |
| But yeah, but so we we talked about that and we've actually made some progress on that where even just recently credit to | 02:22:00 | |
| Commander Kim Knock and Kendall Lawson there liaison, they've actually sent us some grant opportunities recently and and offered | 02:22:07 | |
| to do some letters of support. So that's another area that could be win win. | 02:22:14 | |
| And then #4 collaborate to support services and legislation for military members, veterans and military families. That's already | 02:22:22 | |
| in our legislative platform. So we always, we already commit to that. But we wanted to highlight, you know, because it's easy when | 02:22:28 | |
| we go to the base, it's always easy to say here's what we want from you. But we were also trying to make sure we have some goals | 02:22:34 | |
| that actually support them and actually show that we're willing to, you know, also. | 02:22:40 | |
| Help and not just take. It's nice to say. Here's what we'd like to do for you. | 02:22:48 | |
| When a lot of the families are still our residents too, so. | 02:22:54 | |
| And then last was a security of the community and this tied into the the one with the port. And we just realized that it applies | 02:22:58 | |
| to actually all is really when you talk about the city, the base and the port, those are all for different reasons, things that we | 02:23:06 | |
| should all be focusing on working together to make secure. And each has its own risks, but they it's also kind of each, you know, | 02:23:13 | |
| each hardening, each helps the other. So so we were looking at that. | 02:23:21 | |
| Add those to the list and talk to them about it so. | 02:24:35 | |
| Thank you. | 02:24:39 | |
| Council Council Have any questions for staff? Council member Guma. | 02:24:40 | |
| First of all. | 02:24:45 | |
| A couple months ago, we came across this concept of a Memorial Day celebration lost at sea for the first time ever. We pulled it | 02:24:47 | |
| off on Waimea Pier, and I think it was by any measure, like extremely successful. And so like I'm sitting here right now thinking. | 02:24:56 | |
| Call the commander tomorrow. Let's start planning next year's Memorial Day Lost at sea service. Let's get the Navy involved. Maybe | 02:25:06 | |
| they could float a destroyer by littoral class. | 02:25:12 | |
| We'll have to wait till June. Change of command, yeah, but but again, I think. | 02:25:20 | |
| I think that Memorial Day, our ceremony this past week is the precise thing to, to bring us together. And then all those other | 02:25:25 | |
| things will start falling into place because it, it just, it just has so much potential for not only the, the Navy base, but also | 02:25:32 | |
| the, the port, you know, for us to wear maritime. | 02:25:39 | |
| City ships come and go. | 02:25:47 | |
| So that's my. | 02:25:51 | |
| What my, my hope is that we could begin to start working on next year Memorial Day. And that's really involved the, the, the Navy | 02:25:54 | |
| and, and, and. | 02:25:59 | |
| Let's really kick it up a notch, if that's possible. Martinez. Yes, thank you, Mayor Press. | 02:26:04 | |
| My question is, can we do something nice for the commander since he's going to his His term is going to end soon and we're gonna | 02:26:10 | |
| be getting a new commander coming on board, especially because I. | 02:26:16 | |
| When I was there at the ceremony three years ago, I don't, I saw other cities had whether they give them a certificate or a bag of | 02:26:23 | |
| goodies or something, you know, we, we didn't do that. And so I, I would want us to, to be felt at that, at that ceremony. Is | 02:26:29 | |
| everyone planning on going to the ceremony? | 02:26:34 | |
| It's June. | 02:26:41 | |
| Wanted to say 10th or 11th. Yeah, it's Thursday the the seven. No, it's Friday the 7th at 10:00 AM at Reagan Library. I plan to | 02:26:43 | |
| go. Yeah, I plan to go as well. So we should. | 02:26:49 | |
| 10:00 AM. | 02:26:57 | |
| Sir, is that possible? It'd be nice to have a proclamation. Yeah, I was. I was gonna go to these things in other cities have | 02:26:58 | |
| proclamations and we don't. So yeah, yeah, I was gonna say I think a proclamation would be appropriate. And then we have a couple | 02:27:05 | |
| like things with our logo on them. We can we can find a couple of things to provide. | 02:27:12 | |
| Mayor Pro Tem, do you have a question? | 02:27:20 | |
| Council Member Hernandez, you have a question. | 02:27:22 | |
| No, thank you. | 02:27:25 | |
| OK, do we have any public comments on this item? | 02:27:27 | |
| No public comments. Thank you. | 02:27:30 | |
| So the recommendation is to receive information regarding the Navy City partnership. Does everyone agree with the Five? | 02:27:34 | |
| Yes, plans that city manager brought up. | 02:27:41 | |
| So we can have a motion to approve that, then move to approve. | 02:27:44 | |
| I'll 2nd. | 02:27:50 | |
| Thank you. | 02:27:52 | |
| Council member comma. | 02:27:56 | |
| Yes, Council Member Hernandez. | 02:27:59 | |
| Yes, Councilmember Martinez. Yes. Mayor Pro Tem McQueen. Legend. Yes. And Mayor Perez. Yes. Motion passes unanimously. Thank you. | 02:28:02 | |
| Good job. It looks like we had to have somebody from the Navy who popped up on our screen. Did we see? | 02:28:09 | |
| I'm sorry. Yeah. They have their hand raised. That is the that's the person you were speaking about. That's. | 02:28:19 | |
| Do we want to call? Yes. Good evening everyone. My name is Kendall Lucene. I'm the community plans and liaison with Naval Base | 02:28:26 | |
| Ventura County. Unfortunately, my iPad, I broke the camera so it does not work. Otherwise I would show my glorious smile with all | 02:28:33 | |
| of you this evening. I just want to take a pause with and commend the staff's effort and their dire commitment to getting us to | 02:28:41 | |
| provide input on the city priorities between the city party, me and Dave Place Ventura. | 02:28:48 | |
| Unfortunately, there's only one of me for all three bases. So I again, I appreciate all the patience and cooperative | 02:28:56 | |
| understanding. But one item that I did want to add for the potential priorities, that's a mutual interest both for the shoreline | 02:29:06 | |
| as well as down coast to Point Magoo, the port and also to the city. And that is the interconnection of the Ormond Beach in the. | 02:29:15 | |
| Ecological corridors that from bubbling, springs down to the shoreline. | 02:29:26 | |
| Down to the Magoo Lagoon, to the Ormond Lagoon, those play a significant role in allowing ecological recharge as well as species | 02:29:31 | |
| migration for population conservation purposes and it allows our installation to secure for resilience. Thank you, Thank you. I | 02:29:39 | |
| apologize. If I would have known you were there, I would have called on you before we voted. I apologize for that. Do we need a | 02:29:47 | |
| vote to approve that, to add that in? I would suggest it that we just vote to add that item. | 02:29:55 | |
| I'll just note also that I think one of the conversations we'll have coming up to will be about some goals for Oxnard or for our | 02:30:04 | |
| relationship with Oxnard. And that would probably, I know Kendall mentioned the City Basin port, but that would be one that we | 02:30:10 | |
| definitely want to tie Oxnard into as well. OK. Do we have a motion for that to approve that? | 02:30:17 | |
| Move to approve the the recommendations. | 02:30:25 | |
| He's gone. Did we lose him? | 02:30:29 | |
| No, he's still there. Oh, no, I'm sorry. I can only we can only see like limited in screen. So I can only see Council Member | 02:30:31 | |
| Hernandez. So apologies. So do you have a second for that second? | 02:30:37 | |
| Madam Clerk. | 02:30:43 | |
| Council member comma, Council member Hernandez, Council member Martinez, Mayor Pro Tem McQueen Legend and Mayor Perez. Yes, motion | 02:30:45 | |
| passes unanimously. Thank you so much for your suggestion. | 02:30:51 | |
| OK. | 02:30:59 | |
| O you will now move on to City Manager Comments and reports. | 02:31:02 | |
| Thank you. I have a couple of slides that I will keep very short. Just this week some of the things we were talking about are | 02:31:06 | |
| better shown visually. | 02:31:12 | |
| So thank you. | 02:31:20 | |
| We wanted to highlight a couple of recent things in a couple upcoming things. So one is just mentioned was our Memorial Day | 02:31:24 | |
| ceremony at Wyoming Pier was on last Monday and we wanted to thank everybody who attended. I think we had a really good turn out. | 02:31:31 | |
| And then we also wanted to thank everybody who participated and we had a lot of people help including we had representatives from | 02:31:38 | |
| the Sheriff's Department who participated, representatives from our VFVFW. | 02:31:46 | |
| And the Sea Cadets came, came in and did the presentation of the colors and then. | 02:31:54 | |
| Commanders Amanda Sordone was our keynote speaker. County Supervisor via Lopez, and all council members attended. | 02:32:02 | |
| And then we wanted to thank our recreation facilities and public works teams for coordinating I. | 02:32:09 | |
| And then the last one that we keep, we kept forgetting to mention. So I wanted to give him a special shout out was that our | 02:32:15 | |
| lifeguards happen to be doing their training. And so they led the paddle out and made sure everybody was safe. And so we had I | 02:32:23 | |
| think we had probably 15 to 20 lifeguards there, which was great. And so overall, I think just a really great event that was | 02:32:30 | |
| uniquely Port Hueneme. So we we enjoyed it. We appreciate everybody for coming. So I will definitely. | 02:32:37 | |
| Say thank you to staff. The way they presented the pier was beautiful, so I really appreciate that. | 02:32:45 | |
| We'll be at Booker Park, so we're trying to do them at at all of our parks, so. | 02:33:30 | |
| So we have that. And then I mentioned earlier to our speaker that we have a right now our community benefit fund scholarship first | 02:33:35 | |
| year. We're doing it and we're providing the goals, provide 8 scholarships to high school seniors who reside in Port Hueneme. That | 02:33:43 | |
| application deadline was going to be this weekend, but we've agreed, we worked with the port to extend it for two more weeks to | 02:33:50 | |
| June 14th. We just heard that there was there's a lot of time commitment. | 02:33:58 | |
| I think people finishing up school and everything, so we tried to give everybody a couple more weeks. | 02:34:06 | |
| And then at the same time we're doing our community poster contest for our beach fest posters and those are due for anyone | 02:34:11 | |
| interested by June 7th. And so that would be this week, the poster contest and next week scholarships. SO2 opportunities for for | 02:34:19 | |
| wine EMIS students. Mr. Mr. city Manager regarding the poster, the scholarship program, do we have any? Do we know how many | 02:34:26 | |
| entries? I don't know at this point. | 02:34:33 | |
| I'm not sure, but we do find on these, we typically do get them the last couple days. So I think I don't know that we have more | 02:34:41 | |
| than one or two at this point. I had asked. | 02:34:46 | |
| Mr. Other Vega, Adam Vega sometime early last week, he said that there was at least five, but that was early last week. | 02:34:54 | |
| Do you know how many scholarships are? | 02:35:04 | |
| Application. Oh, actually, that was the scholarship one. | 02:35:07 | |
| That's what I meant to say, yeah. OK, so that was yeah. | 02:35:10 | |
| And so yeah, and we're we people can submit them to either us or the port. So I think you had heard the port had gotten a few, | 02:35:14 | |
| we've gotten just a couple so. | 02:35:19 | |
| But yeah, so the posters were not, I'm not sure off the top of my head how many we've received, but we've we've heard that we're, | 02:35:26 | |
| I think one of a couple of the schools are planning to actually do. | 02:35:31 | |
| Where they're going to have their their students do some of the posters. Oh, good. OK. | 02:35:36 | |
| And then just we want to try to get in the habit because especially the next few agendas, and I mentioned this last meeting that | 02:35:43 | |
| we have kind of full agendas coming up, which is evidenced by the, you know, 600 page agenda this week. That's on June 17th. | 02:35:51 | |
| Here's what we have planned at this point. And we have presentations from the state of the region. The State of the region | 02:35:59 | |
| presentation by the Ventura County Civic Alliance is scheduled, the annual 211 services presentation by interface. | 02:36:07 | |
| Scheduled and then we also I think we'll have the I didn't add it there because it's down below with the regional defense | 02:36:15 | |
| partnership DC trip report should be on that one as well. Public hearings where we when council approved the assessments now it | 02:36:21 | |
| has to come back as a public hearing. So that'll be on the next agenda, the cannabis development agreement review that we | 02:36:28 | |
| implementing what we've talked about previously comes back on that agenda. And then business items, we have three currently | 02:36:34 | |
| scheduled and. | 02:36:40 | |
| And one is the approval of the mural design. I believe the mural committees chosen a design and so we would be essentially | 02:36:48 | |
| reviewing that and and then approving that to move forward the regional defense partnership. We have the presentation scheduled | 02:36:55 | |
| and so we're just timing it to go with it that for the first time in many years, they're requesting a budget increase. So that | 02:37:02 | |
| will be on the agenda for the council to consider. | 02:37:08 | |
| It's it's fairly small, so we'll explain that at that time. And then last, we wanted to do sort of an annual report on how the | 02:37:16 | |
| open gym partnership with the Boys and Girls Club is going. And so that that will be on the agenda, the annual report with some | 02:37:23 | |
| ideas or options for the council to to consider on that project. So Mr. City Manager regarding the mural design, was there an | 02:37:30 | |
| artist picked? | 02:37:37 | |
| I believe that they have selected an artist in a design, yes, Yeah. And we get to know who the name of the artist is. | 02:37:45 | |
| You will get to know, yes, and you'll get to see the design and some of the other renderings by that, by the artist that we | 02:37:53 | |
| selected. And we'll go over the process, how they were selected, how many submittals we got, who was on the selection committee. | 02:38:00 | |
| We'll, we'll give you all that information and then reveal the design. | 02:38:07 | |
| Which we've already provided feedback on. But yeah, we're really excited to bring this to council and I think you'll be very | 02:38:15 | |
| pleased. Thank you. | 02:38:19 | |
| And that's that's what we have scheduled for the next agenda. | 02:38:23 | |
| Move on to Council Member reports and comments. Councilmember Martinez. | 02:38:27 | |
| Briefly, I'll just mention that we have a sister city meeting this Wednesday at 6:00 PM and there's also a tennis clinic for the | 02:38:32 | |
| community on Saturday from 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM at Wyoming High School. It's for six year olds to 13 year olds, so anybody that | 02:38:38 | |
| wants to learn how to play tennis. | 02:38:43 | |
| It's free too. | 02:38:49 | |
| That's all. | 02:38:51 | |
| Just again, I can't say enough about Memorial Day. | 02:38:54 | |
| Lost at sea, paddle out. All that was wonderful. Really appreciate everybody's work on that. | 02:38:59 | |
| This past weekend. | 02:39:06 | |
| Oxnard United Soccer. | 02:39:08 | |
| They came to Windy Beach Cleanup and we plan to split the group into two and so half of the group went over to Perkins Rd. and the | 02:39:12 | |
| other half came to win Amy Beach. | 02:39:17 | |
| And we had. | 02:39:22 | |
| Over 400 people. Wow yeah, crazy and. | 02:39:23 | |
| They it was it was amazing and the work that was done. I think they filled up over on Perkins side to. | 02:39:30 | |
| 2 1/2 dumpsters. We did very well on our side and it was just a great team building experience and I I just really want to. | 02:39:38 | |
| Congratulate Oxnard United Soccer. I've been working with them for like 6 years now I think maybe longer and. | 02:39:47 | |
| The effort that they put in to the developing these young kids into model citizens, I mean, there's a lot more to it. It's not, | 02:39:55 | |
| they're not just kicking a ball around their community service. They're out in the community. They have to, they have to do a | 02:40:01 | |
| bunch of things to, to be a part of of the program. And it's, it's just really wonderful to work with them. So, yeah, it was, it | 02:40:06 | |
| was amazing. | 02:40:12 | |
| I like what I heard tonight, provide more service with less expenditure and I think our city manager is accomplishing that. And | 02:40:20 | |
| it's funny, I was at work this morning and and we're close to finishing our flood recovery, if you could believe that. And it got | 02:40:27 | |
| me thinking how many of the persons that were affected by it have recovered. I know there's some still struggling. A neighbor of | 02:40:34 | |
| mine, believe it or not, just. | 02:40:41 | |
| Is struggling to get his insurance. | 02:40:49 | |
| Moving and so for those of us who are fortunate in to be able to. | 02:40:51 | |
| Work through it I'm happy for, but I'm also relieved to know that a lot of people in our community have really pulled themselves | 02:40:58 | |
| together and they've done well and I'm proud of the city could only do so much and I think we've. | 02:41:06 | |
| Hit that, if not more. | 02:41:14 | |
| So yeah, flood recovery is is still ongoing so but people are doing great and all that. | 02:41:17 | |
| And just looking forward to the summertime. | 02:41:24 | |
| Thank you, Councilmember Hernandez. | 02:41:29 | |
| Thank you, Mayor and Councilman Gomez, thank you for acknowledging the the recovery still going on from our floods. It's recovery | 02:41:35 | |
| process can last for years. And so let's not forget those people who are out there still struggling. Thank you so much for | 02:41:41 | |
| mentioning that. And I also want to thank our staff for the work that they did surrounding the memorial service on the pier. It | 02:41:46 | |
| was a great event. The mayor did a good job. | 02:41:52 | |
| Considering that you weren't fully briefed, I understand on what your role was going to be, but I think you did a great job, so | 02:42:00 | |
| thank you. | 02:42:03 | |
| For representing us also this week, I'll be attending a SCAG meeting on Thursday, oh, Wednesday. I have the strategic planning | 02:42:06 | |
| meeting for RDP and then I will be hopefully attending the change of command on Friday at the Reagan Library. Other than that, I | 02:42:14 | |
| have nothing to report. We already talked about the mural, so we're looking forward to presenting that on the 18th at our next | 02:42:21 | |
| meeting. Thank you, Mayor Pro Tem. | 02:42:28 | |
| First, like say I'm glad to be back. I missed last. | 02:42:38 | |
| Council meeting, but I had a good reason and had a great time. | 02:42:41 | |
| So yeah, so we talked about the museum, we'll be doing our RDP presentation next council meeting and I too will be going to the | 02:42:47 | |
| chain of change of command. Other than that, I'm back attending my committee meetings this week, so. | 02:42:55 | |
| Great. I had no committees to attend. Yes, I will echo everyone, thank you staff for putting that together. The Memorial Day | 02:43:05 | |
| event, that was beautiful. And very big surprise showing up there and seeing the entire pier a decked out in flags. I had no idea | 02:43:11 | |
| that was going to happen. I'm so glad they thought to do that the last minute and got it together. So thank you, Director Basua | 02:43:18 | |
| and her facilities management for making sure the flags got up. | 02:43:24 | |
| I think that's that's all I have. I have no meetings this month and we'll move on to future agenda items. | 02:43:34 | |
| Council Member Martinez. | 02:43:43 | |
| Yes, thank you, Mary Perez, since there's going to be an upcoming agenda item talking about the Boys and Girls Club. | 02:43:45 | |
| I was wondering if maybe we can do do another event there. I've been hosting a annual 3 point shooting contest for the last three | 02:43:53 | |
| years. | 02:43:58 | |
| And I thought maybe we can do something like that at the gym versus it being out outdoors. | 02:44:04 | |
| I, I don't know, I was just thinking we, we can brainstorm. I can, I can tell you a little bit more about my ideas. It, it can be | 02:44:12 | |
| either be done with reach or, or the city or combo or, you know, just what, whatever is best. | 02:44:18 | |
| You know, so just that's kind of what I wanted, just just to at least have that added to that topic. | 02:44:24 | |
| And that we are bringing that report back so we could just add some. We were going to talk about some ideas, so we could add that | 02:44:33 | |
| as an idea. | 02:44:36 | |
| If everybody's OK with that regarding the Boys and Girls Club, I need to have a meeting coming up soon, but they're going to be | 02:44:41 | |
| doing a bunch of construction on that building very soon. So I have no idea if that's, I would assume it's going to impact. | 02:44:48 | |
| The basketball area and the boys and girls told me. | 02:44:56 | |
| That projects going to start soon and it should be over and around March. So maybe about that same time that Bubbling Springs | 02:45:00 | |
| opens up, we're gonna have a new gym here. And they told me that we wouldn't even recognize it, but we'll we'll, we'll see so. | 02:45:07 | |
| So no need for an agenda vote for that. OK, Council Member Gama. | 02:45:15 | |
| Council Member Hernandez. | 02:45:21 | |
| Do you have any future agenda? | 02:45:24 | |
| I'm sorry, no agenda items. | 02:45:27 | |
| Nothing further for me either. | 02:45:30 | |
| So I would like to adjourn this meeting. I would like to adjourn this meeting in recognition of the memorial of our dispatcher, | 02:45:33 | |
| Ivan Vasquez, who the city put on a memorial today at the pavilion. We lost one of our dispatchers recently and. | 02:45:41 | |
| So I just like to send it out to his family. Condolences from the city and council. | 02:45:49 | |
| For their loss. | 02:45:54 | |
| So this next meeting will be Monday, June 17th at 6:30 PM and this meeting is now adjourned at 9:17 PM. | 02:45:56 |